Abstract 4147676: Outcomes Of Chronic Total Occlusion Of Coronary Artery Compared Between Urban And Rural Hospitals In The United States

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary artery is a complex condition necessitating special care, and the prognosis may vary due to differences in technical and human resources between urban and rural hospitals. Aim: To evaluate differences in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalizations for CTO at urban centers compared to rural centers. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016-2021 for hospitalizations related to CTO using the ICD-10 CM code I2582. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between urban and rural hospitals using Pearson Chi-Square test and two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. We also computed adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariate logistic regression models and conducted a sensitivity analysis using 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: Out of 562,880 weighted hospitalizations for CTO, patients admitted to urban centers were younger (mean age 67.78 y vs 68.40 y, p<0.001), more likely to be Black American (10.2% vs 6.4%, p<0.001) or Hispanic (10.2% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), had a longer duration of hospital stay (median 4 d vs 3 d, p<0.001), and witnessed higher total charges (median $89,408 vs $55,559, p<0.001) and total cost (median $21,384 vs $17,279, p<0.001) than those in rural hospitals. Multivariate analyses revealed that patients in urban hospitals had higher odds of mortality (aOR 1.28, p=0.010), cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.55, p<0.001), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.31, p<0.001), requiring mechanical circulatory support (aOR 1.52, p<0.001), and acute kidney injury (aOR 1.24, p<0.001) compared to those at rural hospitals. Urban hospitals were also associated with lower odds of myocardial infarction (aOR 0.79, p<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aOR 0.85, p<0.001). Conclusion: Urban hospitals were associated with increased odds of mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, need for mechanical circulatory support, and acute kidney injury compared to rural hospitals. Despite ample resources at urban hospitals, differential baseline comorbidity burdens may have contributed to these differences thus underscoring the need to conduct prospective studies to better understand the factors responsible for these disparities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147676
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147676: Outcomes Of Chronic Total Occlusion Of Coronary Artery Compared Between Urban And Rural Hospitals In The United States

Yasar Sattar, Muhammad Abdullah Naveed, Salman Abdul Basit, Adishwar Rao et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4147676: Outcomes Of Chronic Total Occlusion Of Coronary Artery Compared Between Urban And Rural Hospitals In The United States

Yasar Sattar, Muhammad Abdullah Naveed, Salman Abdul Basit, Adishwar Rao, Mohammed Saifuddin, Hafeez Hassan
article en

Abstract

Background: Chronic total occlusion (CTO) of the coronary artery is a complex condition necessitating special care, and the prognosis may vary due to differences in technical and human resources between urban and rural hospitals. Aim: To evaluate differences in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in hospitalizations for CTO at urban centers compared to rural centers. Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database from 2016-2021 for hospitalizations related to CTO using the ICD-10 CM code I2582. We compared baseline characteristics and outcomes between urban and rural hospitals using Pearson Chi-Square test and two-sample t-test or Wilcoxon Rank Sum test. We also computed adjusted odds ratios (aORs) using multivariate logistic regression models and conducted a sensitivity analysis using 1:1 propensity score matching. Results: Out of 562,880 weighted hospitalizations for CTO, patients admitted to urban centers were younger (mean age 67.78 y vs 68.40 y, p<0.001), more likely to be Black American (10.2% vs 6.4%, p<0.001) or Hispanic (10.2% vs 6.4%, p<0.001), had a longer duration of hospital stay (median 4 d vs 3 d, p<0.001), and witnessed higher total charges (median $89,408 vs $55,559, p<0.001) and total cost (median $21,384 vs $17,279, p<0.001) than those in rural hospitals. Multivariate analyses revealed that patients in urban hospitals had higher odds of mortality (aOR 1.28, p=0.010), cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.55, p<0.001), cardiac arrest (aOR 1.31, p<0.001), requiring mechanical circulatory support (aOR 1.52, p<0.001), and acute kidney injury (aOR 1.24, p<0.001) compared to those at rural hospitals. Urban hospitals were also associated with lower odds of myocardial infarction (aOR 0.79, p<0.001) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (aOR 0.85, p<0.001). Conclusion: Urban hospitals were associated with increased odds of mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, need for mechanical circulatory support, and acute kidney injury compared to rural hospitals. Despite ample resources at urban hospitals, differential baseline comorbidity burdens may have contributed to these differences thus underscoring the need to conduct prospective studies to better understand the factors responsible for these disparities.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
West Virginia University (US), SUNY Upstate Medical University (US), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Guthrie Robert Packer Hospital (US), Adena Regional Medical Center (US), The Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.