Abstract Sa908: Evaluating the Alignment of Recent Cardiac Arrest Randomized Controlled Trials with the Top Resuscitation Science Knowledge Gaps

Objective: To determine if recently published cardiac arrest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) align with and address the top scientific gaps previously identified in the American Heart Association (AHA) cardiac arrest treatment guidelines. Methods: All RCTs involving human subjects experiencing non-traumatic cardiac arrest, published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022, were identified through searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Abstracts, and full manuscripts when needed, were individually reviewed and categorized according to the themes and rationale for the ten most urgent knowledge gaps in the 2015 AHA cardiac arrest guidelines published by Panchal et al. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: A total of 87 cardiac arrest RCTs were identified over the study period. Most trials included the adult population (84, 96.5%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (62, 71.3%). The RCTs addressed the following top scientific gaps: optimization of post-cardiac arrest care (40, 46.0%), optimal airway management strategies (9, 10.3%), hemodynamic monitoring/goal-directed resuscitation (1, 1.1%), dispatch-directed CPR (1, 1.1%), individualizing resuscitation strategies (1, 1.1%), and novel technology for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest identification and response (1, 1.1%). Recognized gaps in early neuroprognostication, optimizing educational strategies for providers, and prediction of patients at risk of cardiac arrest were not specifically addressed. A total of 34 RCTs (39.0%) targeted other knowledge gaps outside of the top 10. Conclusion: More than half of cardiac arrest RCTs published since 2015 have focused on optimizing post-resuscitative care or airway management strategies, leaving a disparity among other well-recognized knowledge gaps in the AHA cardiac arrest treatment guidelines. Future RCTs aligned with other high-priority gaps in cardiac arrest recognition and treatment are warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa908
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa908: Evaluating the Alignment of Recent Cardiac Arrest Randomized Controlled Trials with the Top Resuscitation Science Knowledge Gaps

Lauren Friend, Claire Gahm, Kelsey Wilhelm, Marianne Gausche‐Hill et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa908: Evaluating the Alignment of Recent Cardiac Arrest Randomized Controlled Trials with the Top Resuscitation Science Knowledge Gaps

Lauren Friend, Claire Gahm, Kelsey Wilhelm, Marianne Gausche‐Hill, James J. Menegazzi, Ashish R. Panchal, Jake Toy, Ryan A. Coute, Michael Kim
article en

Abstract

Objective: To determine if recently published cardiac arrest randomized controlled trials (RCTs) align with and address the top scientific gaps previously identified in the American Heart Association (AHA) cardiac arrest treatment guidelines. Methods: All RCTs involving human subjects experiencing non-traumatic cardiac arrest, published between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2022, were identified through searches in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. Abstracts, and full manuscripts when needed, were individually reviewed and categorized according to the themes and rationale for the ten most urgent knowledge gaps in the 2015 AHA cardiac arrest guidelines published by Panchal et al. The data were analyzed descriptively. Results: A total of 87 cardiac arrest RCTs were identified over the study period. Most trials included the adult population (84, 96.5%) and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (62, 71.3%). The RCTs addressed the following top scientific gaps: optimization of post-cardiac arrest care (40, 46.0%), optimal airway management strategies (9, 10.3%), hemodynamic monitoring/goal-directed resuscitation (1, 1.1%), dispatch-directed CPR (1, 1.1%), individualizing resuscitation strategies (1, 1.1%), and novel technology for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest identification and response (1, 1.1%). Recognized gaps in early neuroprognostication, optimizing educational strategies for providers, and prediction of patients at risk of cardiac arrest were not specifically addressed. A total of 34 RCTs (39.0%) targeted other knowledge gaps outside of the top 10. Conclusion: More than half of cardiac arrest RCTs published since 2015 have focused on optimizing post-resuscitative care or airway management strategies, leaving a disparity among other well-recognized knowledge gaps in the AHA cardiac arrest treatment guidelines. Future RCTs aligned with other high-priority gaps in cardiac arrest recognition and treatment are warranted.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Los Angeles County Museum of Art (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), University of Alabama at Birmingham (US), University of California San Diego (US), Harbor–UCLA Medical Center (US), The Ohio State University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.