Abstract 4147905: A Machine Learning Readmission Risk Prediction Model for Cardiac Disease

Introduction: Circulatory disease ranks ninth highest amongst all-cause US readmissions, and despite an increase in quality improvement initiatives, emergency department visits have increased. Diagnosis specific cardiac machine learning readmission risk prediction models have been created, and at least one general readmission risk model has demonstrated a 25% relative readmission rate reduction in a focused setting. Hypothesis/Aims: The objective of this study was to create a high performing 30-day hospital readmission/emergency department (ED) visit or death risk prediction model. We hypothesized that the model would perform equitably and with high accuracy. Methods: The model was derived from a cohort of acute, cardiac inpatient admissions during 2010-2023 within ten integrated Midwestern hospitals. Encounters in which patients died or were discharged to hospice were excluded. A total of 1,498 clinical and non-clinical predictors were included in three machine learning models. Primary composite outcome was 30-day hospital readmission/ED visit or death. Results: The primary outcome rate was 23.8% and ED visit rate was 7.7% amongst 73,926 encounters spanning 49,144 patients. Heart failure, dysrhythmias, and acute myocardial infarction were the most common readmission diagnoses. XGBoost had the overall highest performance (AUROC of 0.691 and PR-AUC of 0.4158). At a precision of 0.5, XGBoost demonstrated a net benefit relative to current practice. Top predictors include the LACE index and total hospitalized days in the past year. The DeLong test yielded a significant difference in model performance between men and women. Conclusions: We successfully built a 30-day cardiac readmission/ED visit or death risk prediction model that demonstrated a net benefit relative to current practice. The difference in model performance could be driven by gender gaps in cardiac disease recognition, presentation, and treatment. Future directions include external model validation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147905
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147905: A Machine Learning Readmission Risk Prediction Model for Cardiac Disease

Angela Bailey, Casey P. Shannon, Jared D. Huling, Christopher J. Tignanelli et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4147905: A Machine Learning Readmission Risk Prediction Model for Cardiac Disease

Angela Bailey, Casey P. Shannon, Jared D. Huling, Christopher J. Tignanelli, Wei Wang
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Circulatory disease ranks ninth highest amongst all-cause US readmissions, and despite an increase in quality improvement initiatives, emergency department visits have increased. Diagnosis specific cardiac machine learning readmission risk prediction models have been created, and at least one general readmission risk model has demonstrated a 25% relative readmission rate reduction in a focused setting. Hypothesis/Aims: The objective of this study was to create a high performing 30-day hospital readmission/emergency department (ED) visit or death risk prediction model. We hypothesized that the model would perform equitably and with high accuracy. Methods: The model was derived from a cohort of acute, cardiac inpatient admissions during 2010-2023 within ten integrated Midwestern hospitals. Encounters in which patients died or were discharged to hospice were excluded. A total of 1,498 clinical and non-clinical predictors were included in three machine learning models. Primary composite outcome was 30-day hospital readmission/ED visit or death. Results: The primary outcome rate was 23.8% and ED visit rate was 7.7% amongst 73,926 encounters spanning 49,144 patients. Heart failure, dysrhythmias, and acute myocardial infarction were the most common readmission diagnoses. XGBoost had the overall highest performance (AUROC of 0.691 and PR-AUC of 0.4158). At a precision of 0.5, XGBoost demonstrated a net benefit relative to current practice. Top predictors include the LACE index and total hospitalized days in the past year. The DeLong test yielded a significant difference in model performance between men and women. Conclusions: We successfully built a 30-day cardiac readmission/ED visit or death risk prediction model that demonstrated a net benefit relative to current practice. The difference in model performance could be driven by gender gaps in cardiac disease recognition, presentation, and treatment. Future directions include external model validation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Minnesota System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.