Abstract 4148151: Device Extraction Improves Survival in ESRD Patients with CIED Infections

Introduction: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are prone to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections with a reported 12-month infection rate of 1%, portending an all-cause mortality rate up to 35%. Complete device extraction reduces reinfection and mortality, but is complex and carries high risks, especially for ESRD patients. Here we compare outcomes in infected CIED extraction in the ESRD population. Methods: This study utilized data from the TriNetX research network. We included adults with a history of ESRD and CIED infection. Patients were stratified by device extraction, and those with a history of renal transplant were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed, with outcomes of interest: mortality, all-cause admission, sepsis or bacteremia, and 30-day complications. Results: In the ESRD population, we identified 271 patients who underwent extraction for infected CIED and 623 who did not undergo extraction. CIED extraction was associated with improved survival at one year (65.7% vs 57.3%, p=0.047). The survival benefit was evident at 30 days (91.6% vs 85.8%, p=0.03). No appreciable difference in freedom from admission (30.6% vs. 32.1%, p=0.875) or from sepsis or bacteremia (44.9 vs. 44.8%, p=0.130) at one year. At 30 days, there was no difference in development of pericardial effusion or tamponade (95.7% in vs. 98%, p=0.069), respiratory failure (75.9% vs. 73.4%, p=0.529), or red blood cell transfusion (94% vs. 90.1%, p=0.153). In the extraction group, freedom from cardiac surgery at 30 days was 88.1%, with 11.6% of patients requiring open lead extraction. Conclusion: In ESRD patients with CIED infections, device extraction is associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality at one year without increasing the risk of all-cause admission, sepsis or bacteremia, or 30-day complications. These findings support considering device extraction in this high-risk population to improve survival outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize management strategies and address the challenges specific to ESRD patients with CIED infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4148151
Primary Topic
Diverticular Disease and Complications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4148151: Device Extraction Improves Survival in ESRD Patients with CIED Infections

Stefano H. Byer, Edward M. Powers, Ashraf Alzahrani, Peter Farjo et al.
Circulation
Diverticular Disease and Complications
article

Abstract 4148151: Device Extraction Improves Survival in ESRD Patients with CIED Infections

Stefano H. Byer, Edward M. Powers, Ashraf Alzahrani, Peter Farjo, xPaarix xDominicx
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are prone to cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) infections with a reported 12-month infection rate of 1%, portending an all-cause mortality rate up to 35%. Complete device extraction reduces reinfection and mortality, but is complex and carries high risks, especially for ESRD patients. Here we compare outcomes in infected CIED extraction in the ESRD population. Methods: This study utilized data from the TriNetX research network. We included adults with a history of ESRD and CIED infection. Patients were stratified by device extraction, and those with a history of renal transplant were excluded. Propensity score matching was performed, with outcomes of interest: mortality, all-cause admission, sepsis or bacteremia, and 30-day complications. Results: In the ESRD population, we identified 271 patients who underwent extraction for infected CIED and 623 who did not undergo extraction. CIED extraction was associated with improved survival at one year (65.7% vs 57.3%, p=0.047). The survival benefit was evident at 30 days (91.6% vs 85.8%, p=0.03). No appreciable difference in freedom from admission (30.6% vs. 32.1%, p=0.875) or from sepsis or bacteremia (44.9 vs. 44.8%, p=0.130) at one year. At 30 days, there was no difference in development of pericardial effusion or tamponade (95.7% in vs. 98%, p=0.069), respiratory failure (75.9% vs. 73.4%, p=0.529), or red blood cell transfusion (94% vs. 90.1%, p=0.153). In the extraction group, freedom from cardiac surgery at 30 days was 88.1%, with 11.6% of patients requiring open lead extraction. Conclusion: In ESRD patients with CIED infections, device extraction is associated with a significant reduction in all-cause mortality at one year without increasing the risk of all-cause admission, sepsis or bacteremia, or 30-day complications. These findings support considering device extraction in this high-risk population to improve survival outcomes. Further research is needed to optimize management strategies and address the challenges specific to ESRD patients with CIED infections.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Iowa (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Diverticular Disease and Complications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.