Abstract Sa1205: Understanding Barriers to Bystander Use of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in Cardiac Arrest: A Cross-Sectional Survey in North Carolina

Introduction: Early defibrillation is a critical link in the chain of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, bystander defibrillation rates are extremely low (<2% in North Carolina). Barriers to increasing bystander defibrillation rates and the reasons why bystanders rarely perform early defibrillation are not well-defined in North Carolina. Objectives: To assess public awareness of AEDs in areas with an accessible AED. Specifically, we investigated whether the public knew the locations of nearby AEDs, how to use them, and whether they were willing to use an AED in the event of cardiac arrest. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional face-to-face survey study in two large cities in North Carolina (NC): Winston-Salem and Charlotte. The survey instrument consisted of a 14-item questionnaire, which was pre-tested before the study started. Survey locations were chosen based on the availability of a public AED within a radius of 900 feet or less, equivalent to less than a 3-minute round-trip run from the site. Only responders aged 18 years or older who regularly visited or worked in the area were included. Results: In total, 94 surveys were completed, with 52 in Charlotte and 42 in Winston-Salem. The survey population consisted of 57.4% males (n=54), 42.6% Black individuals (n=40), with the most frequently reported age category being 25- to 34-year-olds (n=21). In total, 69.1% (95% CI 59.2% to 77.6%) of responders knew what an AED was, and 83.0% (95% CI 74.1% to 89.2%) were willing to use an AED in the event of cardiac arrest. However, only 23.4% (95% CI 16.0% to 32.9%) knew how to use an AED and 19.2% (95% CI 12.5% to 28.3%) knew where the nearest AED was (Table). Previous CPR training was common but did not identify subjects with greater awareness or understanding about the use of AEDs. Conclusion: While a majority of respondents in our survey in urban NC were aware of what an AED was and were willing to use one, a concerning number lacked knowledge of how to use an AED and were unaware of an AED available within 900 feet of the assessment site. These results suggest areas in need for improvement in the current approach to public AED placement and signage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa1205
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa1205: Understanding Barriers to Bystander Use of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in Cardiac Arrest: A Cross-Sectional Survey in North Carolina

Konstantin A. Krychtiuk, Nina Nouhravesh, Christopher Bull Granger, Lisa A. Kaltenbach et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa1205: Understanding Barriers to Bystander Use of Automated External Defibrillators (AEDs) in Cardiac Arrest: A Cross-Sectional Survey in North Carolina

Konstantin A. Krychtiuk, Nina Nouhravesh, Christopher Bull Granger, Lisa A. Kaltenbach, Daniel B. Mark, Carolina Malta Hansen, Comilla Sasson, Monique A. Starks, Kristian Hay Kragholm, James G. Jollis, Sana M. Al‐Khatib, Audrey L. Blewer, Lisa Monk, Harman Yonis, Christian Torp-Pedersen
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Early defibrillation is a critical link in the chain of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. However, bystander defibrillation rates are extremely low (<2% in North Carolina). Barriers to increasing bystander defibrillation rates and the reasons why bystanders rarely perform early defibrillation are not well-defined in North Carolina. Objectives: To assess public awareness of AEDs in areas with an accessible AED. Specifically, we investigated whether the public knew the locations of nearby AEDs, how to use them, and whether they were willing to use an AED in the event of cardiac arrest. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional face-to-face survey study in two large cities in North Carolina (NC): Winston-Salem and Charlotte. The survey instrument consisted of a 14-item questionnaire, which was pre-tested before the study started. Survey locations were chosen based on the availability of a public AED within a radius of 900 feet or less, equivalent to less than a 3-minute round-trip run from the site. Only responders aged 18 years or older who regularly visited or worked in the area were included. Results: In total, 94 surveys were completed, with 52 in Charlotte and 42 in Winston-Salem. The survey population consisted of 57.4% males (n=54), 42.6% Black individuals (n=40), with the most frequently reported age category being 25- to 34-year-olds (n=21). In total, 69.1% (95% CI 59.2% to 77.6%) of responders knew what an AED was, and 83.0% (95% CI 74.1% to 89.2%) were willing to use an AED in the event of cardiac arrest. However, only 23.4% (95% CI 16.0% to 32.9%) knew how to use an AED and 19.2% (95% CI 12.5% to 28.3%) knew where the nearest AED was (Table). Previous CPR training was common but did not identify subjects with greater awareness or understanding about the use of AEDs. Conclusion: While a majority of respondents in our survey in urban NC were aware of what an AED was and were willing to use one, a concerning number lacked knowledge of how to use an AED and were unaware of an AED available within 900 feet of the assessment site. These results suggest areas in need for improvement in the current approach to public AED placement and signage.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Aalborg University Hospital (DK), Rigshospitalet (DK), Clinical Research Institute (US), Nordsjællands Hospital (DK), Asheville Cardiology Associates (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.