Abstract 4147962: Resource Utilization and Short-term Readmissions After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplantations in Adults in the United States – A Contemporary Insight from the National Readmission Database: 2018 -

Introduction: Heart transplants (HT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are treatment options for advanced heart failure refractory to standard therapy. Historically, LVADs have been used as either destination therapy or a bridge to transplant. However, recent changes to the organ allocation system have deprioritized patients on LVADs as transplant recipients, leading to divisive views on the role of an LVAD. We sought to describe outcomes with each modality, highlighting each option's strengths and clinical utility. Aim: To assess costs related to index hospitalization, 30-day (30DRC) and 90-day (90DRC) readmission categories for both subgroups. Method: We analyzed the National Readmission Database (NRD) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, identifying patients with HT and LVAD via ICD-10-CM codes. We selected this recent time frame to limit the influence of older LVAD technology and heart allocation schemes. We excluded patients <18 and patients with HT and LVAD during the index hospitalization. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission rates after index hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the cost of hospitalization during the index hospitalization and readmissions. Results: We identified 27,308 weighted index hospital admissions from January to December 2018-2021; LVAD was implanted in 14295 (52.4%). The median index admission cost is lower in the HT subgroup than in the LVAD subgroup across all studied years (Figure 1a). Both groups, however, show an increase in median costs from 2018 to 2021, with an 11.8% rise in the LVAD subgroup and a 32.42% rise in the HT subgroup. In the 30DRC, we identified 22,723 index hospitalizations, of which 11378 (50.07%) were LVAD recipients. LVAD recipients were significantly more likely to be hospitalized within 30 days (3164, 27.8% vs 2838, 25.01%; p=0.001). However, the HT group had higher readmission costs [$16660 ($9483 - $31173) vs$11732 ($6037 - $27059)), p=0.001]. Similar findings were noted in the 90DRC group (Figure 1b and Figure 2). Conclusion: Both LVAD and HT had comparable burdens on resource and short-term rehospitalization risk. Index hospitalization costs were higher for the LVAD group, whereas HT was associated with higher readmission-related costs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147962
Primary Topic
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147962: Resource Utilization and Short-term Readmissions After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplantations in Adults in the United States – A Contemporary Insight from the National Readmission Database: 2018 -

Abhishek Jaiswal, Zeina Jedeon, Ashwin Pillai, Karanrajsinh Raol et al.
Circulation
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
article

Abstract 4147962: Resource Utilization and Short-term Readmissions After Implantation of Left Ventricular Assist Devices and Heart Transplantations in Adults in the United States – A Contemporary Insight from the National Readmission Database: 2018 -

Abhishek Jaiswal, Zeina Jedeon, Ashwin Pillai, Karanrajsinh Raol, Phanidhar Mogga, Aditya Saholi, G. Kambam, Kerry Singh, prathyusha Mudduluru
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart transplants (HT) and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are treatment options for advanced heart failure refractory to standard therapy. Historically, LVADs have been used as either destination therapy or a bridge to transplant. However, recent changes to the organ allocation system have deprioritized patients on LVADs as transplant recipients, leading to divisive views on the role of an LVAD. We sought to describe outcomes with each modality, highlighting each option's strengths and clinical utility. Aim: To assess costs related to index hospitalization, 30-day (30DRC) and 90-day (90DRC) readmission categories for both subgroups. Method: We analyzed the National Readmission Database (NRD) from January 1, 2018, to December 31, 2021, identifying patients with HT and LVAD via ICD-10-CM codes. We selected this recent time frame to limit the influence of older LVAD technology and heart allocation schemes. We excluded patients <18 and patients with HT and LVAD during the index hospitalization. The primary outcomes were 30-day and 90-day readmission rates after index hospital discharge. Secondary outcomes included the cost of hospitalization during the index hospitalization and readmissions. Results: We identified 27,308 weighted index hospital admissions from January to December 2018-2021; LVAD was implanted in 14295 (52.4%). The median index admission cost is lower in the HT subgroup than in the LVAD subgroup across all studied years (Figure 1a). Both groups, however, show an increase in median costs from 2018 to 2021, with an 11.8% rise in the LVAD subgroup and a 32.42% rise in the HT subgroup. In the 30DRC, we identified 22,723 index hospitalizations, of which 11378 (50.07%) were LVAD recipients. LVAD recipients were significantly more likely to be hospitalized within 30 days (3164, 27.8% vs 2838, 25.01%; p=0.001). However, the HT group had higher readmission costs [$16660 ($9483 - $31173) vs$11732 ($6037 - $27059)), p=0.001]. Similar findings were noted in the 90DRC group (Figure 1b and Figure 2). Conclusion: Both LVAD and HT had comparable burdens on resource and short-term rehospitalization risk. Index hospitalization costs were higher for the LVAD group, whereas HT was associated with higher readmission-related costs.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Hartford Hospital (US), University of Connecticut (US), University of Louisville (US), University of Hartford (US), St. Vincent's Medical Center (US), St Vincent Medical Center (US), Quinnipiac University (US), Hartford Financial Services (United States)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.