Abstract 4147927: Gut Microbiome Clusters and Their Clinical Correlates in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment

Background: Recent studies have reported associations between alterations in gut microbiome composition (GMC) and cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVR). However, data regarding the use of GMC as a biomarker of CVR is scarce. Aims: The current study was designed to assess the distinct patterns in GMC among patients with varying degrees of CVR and/or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: Patients with a range of CVR including hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), diabetes (DM), and/or ASCVD referring to Mayo Clinic from 2013 to 2018 were prospectively enrolled. DNA extracted from stool samples was analyzed using the V3-V5 region of the 16s data. Microbial α-diversity was assessed by the observed taxonomic units, Shannon, and Chao1 indices. β-diversity was assessed using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and plotted using principal coordinates analysis. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify patterns in the GMC samples. Random Forest analysis was used to identify the most important clinical factors differentiating the clusters. Results: A total of 211 patients with a median age of 60 [IQR: 50,70] years and with 90 (42.7%) males were included. Two clusters of GMC were identified (Figure 1A) . Cluster 1 and 2 had 104 (49.3%) and 107 (50.7%) patients, respectively. Among CVRs, age and body mass index were the most prominent factors contributing to the difference in GMC among clusters ( Figure 1B ). Cluster 2 had a better α diversity profile than Cluster 1 (Figure 1C-E) . There was no significant difference in TMAO between clusters (P=0.6). Cluster 2 patients were younger (P<0.001), leaner (P=0.007), more physically active (P<0.001), less male (P=0.009), and had a lower prevalence of ASCVD (P=0.003), HTN (P=0.010), and HLD (P=0.005). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of DM (P=0.063), smoking (P=0.446), and alcohol intake (P=0.134) between the clusters. Conclusion: This study suggests the potential of GMC profiling as a valuable biomarker for assessing CVRs, with age and BMI as the most prominent factors associated with GMC clustering.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147927
Primary Topic
Diet and metabolism studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147927: Gut Microbiome Clusters and Their Clinical Correlates in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment

Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Lerman, Negin Mahmoudi Hamidabad, B Lewis
Circulation
Diet and metabolism studies
article

Abstract 4147927: Gut Microbiome Clusters and Their Clinical Correlates in Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment

Lilach O. Lerman, Amir Lerman, Negin Mahmoudi Hamidabad, B Lewis
article en

Abstract

Background: Recent studies have reported associations between alterations in gut microbiome composition (GMC) and cardiovascular disease risk factors (CVR). However, data regarding the use of GMC as a biomarker of CVR is scarce. Aims: The current study was designed to assess the distinct patterns in GMC among patients with varying degrees of CVR and/or atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Methods: Patients with a range of CVR including hypertension (HTN), hyperlipidemia (HLD), diabetes (DM), and/or ASCVD referring to Mayo Clinic from 2013 to 2018 were prospectively enrolled. DNA extracted from stool samples was analyzed using the V3-V5 region of the 16s data. Microbial α-diversity was assessed by the observed taxonomic units, Shannon, and Chao1 indices. β-diversity was assessed using Bray-Curtis dissimilarity and plotted using principal coordinates analysis. Hierarchical clustering was used to identify patterns in the GMC samples. Random Forest analysis was used to identify the most important clinical factors differentiating the clusters. Results: A total of 211 patients with a median age of 60 [IQR: 50,70] years and with 90 (42.7%) males were included. Two clusters of GMC were identified (Figure 1A) . Cluster 1 and 2 had 104 (49.3%) and 107 (50.7%) patients, respectively. Among CVRs, age and body mass index were the most prominent factors contributing to the difference in GMC among clusters ( Figure 1B ). Cluster 2 had a better α diversity profile than Cluster 1 (Figure 1C-E) . There was no significant difference in TMAO between clusters (P=0.6). Cluster 2 patients were younger (P<0.001), leaner (P=0.007), more physically active (P<0.001), less male (P=0.009), and had a lower prevalence of ASCVD (P=0.003), HTN (P=0.010), and HLD (P=0.005). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of DM (P=0.063), smoking (P=0.446), and alcohol intake (P=0.134) between the clusters. Conclusion: This study suggests the potential of GMC profiling as a valuable biomarker for assessing CVRs, with age and BMI as the most prominent factors associated with GMC clustering.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Mayo Clinic (US)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Diet and metabolism studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.