Abstract 4147915: Title: Cardiovascular Events Associated with Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Bosentan and Ambrisentan

Introduction: Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are the mainstay therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, there is limited data on cardiac adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with ERA medications. We performed a pharmacovigilance study comparing bosentan and ambrisentan using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data. Methods: Cardiac ADE data for bosentan and ambrisentan from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023, in the FAERS database were retrieved. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) aligned with p-values. The following cardiac ADEs were included: atrial fibrillation (AF), right ventricular failure (RVF), and cardiac arrest (CA). Results: For adults ≥ 18 years, a total of 12,058 cardiac ADEs were reported for both bosentan (38%) and ambrisentan (62%). Among the selected cardiac ADEs, AF was more frequently reported with bosentan (ROR 3.99, 95% CI: 3.62-4.40) than ambrisentan (ROR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.77-2.07). RVF showed a significantly higher ROR for bosentan (73.60, 95% CI: 66.68-81.25) than ambrisentan (23.11, 95% CI: 20.99-25.46). CA was also more commonly associated with bosentan (ROR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.98-2.55) than with ambrisentan (ROR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.78), with all comparisons showing p-values < 0.001. Conclusion: Our study identifies a significantly higher frequency of cardiac ADEs, particularly AF, RVF, and CA, in patients treated with bosentan compared to ambrisentan. This finding corroborates previous literature that has suggested differential safety profiles among ERAs, emphasizing the need for vigilant cardiac monitoring. Clinicians should integrate these insights into their practice, potentially favoring ambrisentan in patients with elevated cardiac risk, thus optimizing the management of PAH and improving patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147915
Primary Topic
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147915: Title: Cardiovascular Events Associated with Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Bosentan and Ambrisentan

Elsy V. Navas, Dhiran Verghese, Laura Müller, Sadhana Jonna et al.
Circulation
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
article

Abstract 4147915: Title: Cardiovascular Events Associated with Endothelin Receptor Antagonists: A Pharmacovigilance Analysis of Bosentan and Ambrisentan

Elsy V. Navas, Dhiran Verghese, Laura Müller, Sadhana Jonna, Azeem Rathore, Dániel Hanna, Juan Carlos Sierra, Mehdi Mirsaeidi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) are the mainstay therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, there is limited data on cardiac adverse drug events (ADEs) associated with ERA medications. We performed a pharmacovigilance study comparing bosentan and ambrisentan using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) data. Methods: Cardiac ADE data for bosentan and ambrisentan from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2023, in the FAERS database were retrieved. Disproportionality analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) aligned with p-values. The following cardiac ADEs were included: atrial fibrillation (AF), right ventricular failure (RVF), and cardiac arrest (CA). Results: For adults ≥ 18 years, a total of 12,058 cardiac ADEs were reported for both bosentan (38%) and ambrisentan (62%). Among the selected cardiac ADEs, AF was more frequently reported with bosentan (ROR 3.99, 95% CI: 3.62-4.40) than ambrisentan (ROR 1.91, 95% CI: 1.77-2.07). RVF showed a significantly higher ROR for bosentan (73.60, 95% CI: 66.68-81.25) than ambrisentan (23.11, 95% CI: 20.99-25.46). CA was also more commonly associated with bosentan (ROR 2.25, 95% CI: 1.98-2.55) than with ambrisentan (ROR 0.69, 95% CI: 0.61-0.78), with all comparisons showing p-values < 0.001. Conclusion: Our study identifies a significantly higher frequency of cardiac ADEs, particularly AF, RVF, and CA, in patients treated with bosentan compared to ambrisentan. This finding corroborates previous literature that has suggested differential safety profiles among ERAs, emphasizing the need for vigilant cardiac monitoring. Clinicians should integrate these insights into their practice, potentially favoring ambrisentan in patients with elevated cardiac risk, thus optimizing the management of PAH and improving patient outcomes.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of North Florida (US), Naples Community Hospital Healthcare System (US), Jacksonville College (US), WinnMed (US), University of Florida (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US), Florida College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.