Abstract 4147980: Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Engagement in an Implementation Science-Informed Digital Health Intervention for Depression Treatment in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Introduction: Nearly 1 in 5 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients experience depression, an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events. Yet, depression remains undertreated in CHD patients, and few existing implementation strategies address gaps in AHA depression treatment guidelines. Although digital health interventions may help provide patient preference-driven treatment and support, provider perceptions of these tools are poorly understood. Methods: From 2019 to 2024, we randomized 12 Columbia University Medical Center affiliated primary care and cardiology clinics to timing of a multi-level intervention, which includes problem-solving meetings for mental health social workers (MHSW), cardiologist/PCP (provider) education, and integration of a psychoeducation, activation, and treatment digital selection tool (“iHeart”). We previously found pre-post improvements in provider referral/prescribing rates (25 vs. 40%). Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0, we conducted 1:1 interviews on treatment barriers and iHeart tool/digital health acceptability with 2-3 providers/MHSW/administrators per clinic in the post-implementation phase. We conducted thematic analyses, incorporating a data-driven inductive approach. Results: To date, 10 clinics completed the post implementation phase, and 20 clinicians consented to interviews. Key themes included 1. dissatisfaction with current depression screening and referral practices 2. Poor integration of digital therapeutics into existing clinic resource hubs, 3. Competing time and priorities and 4. Digital literacy in older, non-English speaking, or low-income patients limits uptake. For specific iHeart feedback, barriers included needing integration into the pre-visit screening workflow and confidentiality concerns. However, providers felt it would streamline the burdensome referral process and improve overall patient communication on mental health issues. For future stages, providers recommended clarifying tool integration infrastructure (e.g. for individual providers or entire clinic), engaging patient family members, and incorporating a navigation team component to orient patients with technological or literacy barriers. Conclusion: A multi-level digital health implementation strategy may help address existing clinician barriers to depression treatment in individuals with CHD. Future studies will examine impact on patient symptoms, management patterns, and treatment uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4147980
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4147980: Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Engagement in an Implementation Science-Informed Digital Health Intervention for Depression Treatment in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Samantha Flores, Kain Kim, Jennifer Mizhquiri Barbecho, Nathalie Moise et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Abstract 4147980: Barriers and Facilitators to Clinician Engagement in an Implementation Science-Informed Digital Health Intervention for Depression Treatment in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease

Samantha Flores, Kain Kim, Jennifer Mizhquiri Barbecho, Nathalie Moise, Nohora Ospina, Meredith E. Diamond
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Nearly 1 in 5 coronary heart disease (CHD) patients experience depression, an independent risk factor for major adverse cardiovascular events. Yet, depression remains undertreated in CHD patients, and few existing implementation strategies address gaps in AHA depression treatment guidelines. Although digital health interventions may help provide patient preference-driven treatment and support, provider perceptions of these tools are poorly understood. Methods: From 2019 to 2024, we randomized 12 Columbia University Medical Center affiliated primary care and cardiology clinics to timing of a multi-level intervention, which includes problem-solving meetings for mental health social workers (MHSW), cardiologist/PCP (provider) education, and integration of a psychoeducation, activation, and treatment digital selection tool (“iHeart”). We previously found pre-post improvements in provider referral/prescribing rates (25 vs. 40%). Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research 2.0, we conducted 1:1 interviews on treatment barriers and iHeart tool/digital health acceptability with 2-3 providers/MHSW/administrators per clinic in the post-implementation phase. We conducted thematic analyses, incorporating a data-driven inductive approach. Results: To date, 10 clinics completed the post implementation phase, and 20 clinicians consented to interviews. Key themes included 1. dissatisfaction with current depression screening and referral practices 2. Poor integration of digital therapeutics into existing clinic resource hubs, 3. Competing time and priorities and 4. Digital literacy in older, non-English speaking, or low-income patients limits uptake. For specific iHeart feedback, barriers included needing integration into the pre-visit screening workflow and confidentiality concerns. However, providers felt it would streamline the burdensome referral process and improve overall patient communication on mental health issues. For future stages, providers recommended clarifying tool integration infrastructure (e.g. for individual providers or entire clinic), engaging patient family members, and incorporating a navigation team component to orient patients with technological or literacy barriers. Conclusion: A multi-level digital health implementation strategy may help address existing clinician barriers to depression treatment in individuals with CHD. Future studies will examine impact on patient symptoms, management patterns, and treatment uptake.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Emory University (US), Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US), Columbia University (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.