Abstract Sa701: Sex disparities in receipt of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and associated time measures

Introduction: Female sex is associated with lower rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) in public. Telecommunicator CPR (T-CPR), or provision of CPR instructions when individuals call 9-1-1, is essential to improving B-CPR. Few investigations have examined how T-CPR impacts this known sex difference in receipt of B-CPR. Objectives: We sought to examine sex disparities in receipt of B-CPR and time measures with provision of T-CPR. We hypothesized that with provision of T-CPR instruction, there would be no sex disparity in the receipt of B-CPR. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) from the North Carolina (NC) RACE-CARS trial ( NCT04660526) dispatch module. We examined differences between males and females in receipt of B-CPR (primary outcome) and time measures (secondary outcomes), including time to recognition and time to first compression (secs). Between-group comparisons were assessed using the Pearson’s Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Results: From 7/2022-12/2023, RACE-CARS collected data on 8,839 OHCAs covering 52 counties in NC. After excluding pediatric, traumatic, EMS-witnessed, and healthcare facility arrests there were 2,398 OHCAs. Median (25 th , 75 th percentiles) age was 63 (49-74), 67% were White, and 37% were female. B-CPR was administered in 52% of the OHCAs (81% with telecommunicator assistance vs. 19% without). When the telecommunicator provided assistance vs when they did not, B-CPR was 44% vs. 9% for female patients and 40% vs. 11% for male patients; these sex differences were not statistically significant (p=ns). Median time to CPR recognition from call received (secs) was 87 (50-149) for females vs. 87 (53-160) for males. Median time to first compression from telecommunicator call to call received (secs) was 204 (147-275) for females vs. 207 (145-281) for males (p=ns). Conclusion: Telecommunicator CPR may potentially attenuate the known sex disparity in receipt of B-CPR. Understanding this may help inform future health policy and advocacy for prehospital systems of care. Future work may examine how T-CPR decreases sex variation and increases B-CPR especially in women.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.sa701
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract Sa701: Sex disparities in receipt of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and associated time measures

Konstantin A. Krychtiuk, Christopher Bull Granger, Lisa A. Kaltenbach, Daniel B. Mark et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract Sa701: Sex disparities in receipt of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation and associated time measures

Konstantin A. Krychtiuk, Christopher Bull Granger, Lisa A. Kaltenbach, Daniel B. Mark, Hayden B. Bosworth, Monique A. Starks, Steve Vandeventer, Hussein R. Al‐Khalidi, Sana M. Al‐Khatib, Bryan McNally, Carolina Malta Hansen, Audrey L. Blewer, Lisa Monk, Stephen Powell, Harman Yonis
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Female sex is associated with lower rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) in public. Telecommunicator CPR (T-CPR), or provision of CPR instructions when individuals call 9-1-1, is essential to improving B-CPR. Few investigations have examined how T-CPR impacts this known sex difference in receipt of B-CPR. Objectives: We sought to examine sex disparities in receipt of B-CPR and time measures with provision of T-CPR. We hypothesized that with provision of T-CPR instruction, there would be no sex disparity in the receipt of B-CPR. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult, non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) from the North Carolina (NC) RACE-CARS trial ( NCT04660526) dispatch module. We examined differences between males and females in receipt of B-CPR (primary outcome) and time measures (secondary outcomes), including time to recognition and time to first compression (secs). Between-group comparisons were assessed using the Pearson’s Chi-square or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Results: From 7/2022-12/2023, RACE-CARS collected data on 8,839 OHCAs covering 52 counties in NC. After excluding pediatric, traumatic, EMS-witnessed, and healthcare facility arrests there were 2,398 OHCAs. Median (25 th , 75 th percentiles) age was 63 (49-74), 67% were White, and 37% were female. B-CPR was administered in 52% of the OHCAs (81% with telecommunicator assistance vs. 19% without). When the telecommunicator provided assistance vs when they did not, B-CPR was 44% vs. 9% for female patients and 40% vs. 11% for male patients; these sex differences were not statistically significant (p=ns). Median time to CPR recognition from call received (secs) was 87 (50-149) for females vs. 87 (53-160) for males. Median time to first compression from telecommunicator call to call received (secs) was 204 (147-275) for females vs. 207 (145-281) for males (p=ns). Conclusion: Telecommunicator CPR may potentially attenuate the known sex disparity in receipt of B-CPR. Understanding this may help inform future health policy and advocacy for prehospital systems of care. Future work may examine how T-CPR decreases sex variation and increases B-CPR especially in women.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Emory University (US), Duke University (US), Rigshospitalet (DK), Clinical Research Institute (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Wake Forest University (US), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.