Small grants advance global ocean conservation and management equity

Threats to ocean health are not distributed equally among nations: low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately impacted by conservation threats, which are frequently driven by high-income countries (HICs). These inequities and resultant challenges have been driven by a long history of colonialism and resource exploitation by HICs. There has been a growing recognition that these colonial practices and inequities have been perpetuated in the ocean science and conservation fields. This recognition has led to increased discourse about the need for social equity in ocean science and conservation. We explore the potential of small grants programs to address conservation challenges in a manner that promotes management equity (one component of social equity) by reviewing the characteristics and outcomes of projects funded in the first 21 years (1999–2020) of the Marine Conservation Action Fund (MCAF), a small grants program focused on global ocean conservation. Our review of MCAF provides evidence that small grants advance global ocean conservation and management equity. We highlight characteristics of grants programs that enable lasting conservation impacts: openness to risk and responsiveness to emerging conservation needs. To promote management equity in conservation science and practice, we recommend ensuring funding is accessible to project leaders and local organizations in LMICs, providing flexibility in proposal and reporting structures, supporting the design and implementation of projects that are driven by local priorities, providing support to projects that engage stakeholders in developing solutions, and seeking input from the leaders the program serves. • There is a growing recognition of the need for management equity in ocean conservation. • Access to funding is a challenge to advancing management equity. • We review projects funded from 1999 to 2020 by the Marine Conservation Action Fund. • Our review shows that small grants advance ocean conservation and management equity. • We provide recommendations for more equitable and participatory funding approaches.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2024.110845
Primary Topic
Coastal and Marine Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small grants advance global ocean conservation and management equity

Michael F. Tlusty, Kerstin Forsberg, Brent Edwards, Nelly Isigi Kadagi et al.
Biological Conservation
Coastal and Marine Management
article

Small grants advance global ocean conservation and management equity

Michael F. Tlusty, Kerstin Forsberg, Brent Edwards, Nelly Isigi Kadagi, Asha de Vos, Jessica V. Redfern, Elizabeth H. Stephenson, Emily Duwan, Benny Berger
article en

Abstract

Threats to ocean health are not distributed equally among nations: low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately impacted by conservation threats, which are frequently driven by high-income countries (HICs). These inequities and resultant challenges have been driven by a long history of colonialism and resource exploitation by HICs. There has been a growing recognition that these colonial practices and inequities have been perpetuated in the ocean science and conservation fields. This recognition has led to increased discourse about the need for social equity in ocean science and conservation. We explore the potential of small grants programs to address conservation challenges in a manner that promotes management equity (one component of social equity) by reviewing the characteristics and outcomes of projects funded in the first 21 years (1999–2020) of the Marine Conservation Action Fund (MCAF), a small grants program focused on global ocean conservation. Our review of MCAF provides evidence that small grants advance global ocean conservation and management equity. We highlight characteristics of grants programs that enable lasting conservation impacts: openness to risk and responsiveness to emerging conservation needs. To promote management equity in conservation science and practice, we recommend ensuring funding is accessible to project leaders and local organizations in LMICs, providing flexibility in proposal and reporting structures, supporting the design and implementation of projects that are driven by local priorities, providing support to projects that engage stakeholders in developing solutions, and seeking input from the leaders the program serves. • There is a growing recognition of the need for management equity in ocean conservation. • Access to funding is a challenge to advancing management equity. • We review projects funded from 1999 to 2020 by the Marine Conservation Action Fund. • Our review shows that small grants advance ocean conservation and management equity. • We provide recommendations for more equitable and participatory funding approaches.

Biological ConservationVol. 300
The University of Western Australia (AU), Bay Institute (US), New England Aquarium (US), Ocean Institute (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), World Wildlife Fund (US), Industrial Technology Institute (LK), Cabot (United States) (US)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Coastal and Marine Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.