Integrated MCDM-AHP and MABAC for Selection Head of Branch Offices

Leadership changes are very urgent in maintaining organizational stability. A good relay can build significant strength in carrying out organizational operational activities, of course this must be done with good selection. The purpose of this writing is to provide a consistent picture of the selection of branch heads in carrying out business competition which is measured based on the competencies possessed by the selected employees. The barometer is determined based on eight criteria as an assessment that is declared objective by the leadership, namely critical thinking, communication, analyzing, creative and innovation, leadership, adaptation, cooperation, and public speaking. The method used will be implemented in an integrated manner from the two MCDM-AHP methods and the MABAC method. These two methods have similar applications to the selection process. MCDM-AHP is used to select eight criteria as determinants of weighting and the MABAC method is used to determine the ranking process assessment for integrated decision making. The results obtained based on the weighted matrices of the branch head office selection process were measurably obtained, namely that the first priority was held by A11 with a weight of 1,406. The results of the integrity of both methods can provide evidence of decision support for the branch head selection process consistently with optimal results. The ranking system can be regulated and utilized for the purposes of selecting leaders to be placed in other positions.