A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Grammarly in Improving the Writing Skills of ESL/EFL Students

This systematic literature review examines the effectiveness of Grammarly as an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool for improving the writing skills of English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Drawing on 10 studies published between 2018 and 2024, the review assesses Grammarly’s key features, benefits, and limitations. Results show that Grammarly significantly reduces grammatical errors, enhances students’ writing confidence, and fosters autonomous learning. However, challenges such as over-reliance on the tool and its limited capacity to provide comprehensive feedback on higher-order writing skills remain. The review underscores the need for further research into Grammarly’s long-term effects on writing development, particularly its efficacy across various academic disciplines and contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research
Published
2024-09-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.11594/ijmaber.05.09.10
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Language Acquisition and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.58
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Grammarly in Improving the Writing Skills of ESL/EFL Students

Orville Jr Evardo, Eduardo Bárcena Ruiz, Shaina May Llausas, Syndrell Mae Ayucan
2 citations
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research
Language Acquisition and Education
1.58
article

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Grammarly in Improving the Writing Skills of ESL/EFL Students

Orville Jr Evardo, Eduardo Bárcena Ruiz, Shaina May Llausas, Syndrell Mae Ayucan
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This systematic literature review examines the effectiveness of Grammarly as an Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) tool for improving the writing skills of English as a Second Language (ESL) and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students. Drawing on 10 studies published between 2018 and 2024, the review assesses Grammarly’s key features, benefits, and limitations. Results show that Grammarly significantly reduces grammatical errors, enhances students’ writing confidence, and fosters autonomous learning. However, challenges such as over-reliance on the tool and its limited capacity to provide comprehensive feedback on higher-order writing skills remain. The review underscores the need for further research into Grammarly’s long-term effects on writing development, particularly its efficacy across various academic disciplines and contexts.

International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education ResearchVol. 5(9)
Davao del Norte State College (PH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Language Acquisition and Education
1.58
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Systematic Literature Review on the Use of Grammarly in Improving the Writing Skills of ESL/EFL Students — Orville Jr Evardo, Eduardo Bárcena Ruiz, et al. · International Journal of Multidisciplinary Applied Business and Education Research (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS