Electron inertial effects in the rarefied regime of a direct-current (DC) breakdown

Abstract A multi-fluid moment model, a drift-diffusion (DD) model, and a particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) model are compared to investigate direct-current breakdown accounting only for singly charged ions and electrons. The key difference between the moment and DD models is that the electron inertial terms are taken into account in the moment model while the DD models neglect the inertia terms. The breakdown voltage results obtained from the multi-fluid moment and PIC-MCC models are in good agreement with each other over a wide range of pd values, where p is the gas pressure and d is the distance between the cathode and anode. The steady-state electron momentum balance reveals the importance of the electron inertial term at low values of pd , showing the invalidity of the DD approximation under such conditions. The results also show that the main electron energy loss mechanism transitions from volumetric (collisional) losses at high pd regime, which corresponds to low reduced electric field, to convective heat to the anode at low pd regime, where the reduced electric field is high.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6595/ad92a8
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.88

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Electron inertial effects in the rarefied regime of a direct-current (DC) breakdown

Kentaro Hara, A. R. Mansour, Yusuke Yamashita, Luca Vialetto
9 citations
Plasma Sources Science and Technology
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
1.88
article

Electron inertial effects in the rarefied regime of a direct-current (DC) breakdown

Kentaro Hara, A. R. Mansour, Yusuke Yamashita, Luca Vialetto
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Abstract A multi-fluid moment model, a drift-diffusion (DD) model, and a particle-in-cell/Monte Carlo collision (PIC-MCC) model are compared to investigate direct-current breakdown accounting only for singly charged ions and electrons. The key difference between the moment and DD models is that the electron inertial terms are taken into account in the moment model while the DD models neglect the inertia terms. The breakdown voltage results obtained from the multi-fluid moment and PIC-MCC models are in good agreement with each other over a wide range of pd values, where p is the gas pressure and d is the distance between the cathode and anode. The steady-state electron momentum balance reveals the importance of the electron inertial term at low values of pd , showing the invalidity of the DD approximation under such conditions. The results also show that the main electron energy loss mechanism transitions from volumetric (collisional) losses at high pd regime, which corresponds to low reduced electric field, to convective heat to the anode at low pd regime, where the reduced electric field is high.

Plasma Sources Science and TechnologyVol. 33(11)
Vaughn College of Aeronautics and Technology (US), American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (US), Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics (CN)
Lam Research, Samsung, Office of Naval Research, Fusion Energy Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
1.88
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.