Cultural ecosystem services and disservices in protected areas: Hotspots and influencing factors based on tourists’ digital footprints

• 23 types of cultural ecosystem services hot spots were unveiled. • CEDS were identified, accounting for 13.5% of the coding results of digital footprint. • The interaction between GDP and urban proximity contributed most to CES distribution. • Grounded approach enhances digital footprint analysis in ecosystem service studies. Protected areas provide invaluable cultural ecosystem services, attracting increased attention. However, standardized evaluation criteria for cultural ecosystem services (CES) are still lacking, and the influencing factors remain largely unknown, making it difficult to fully understand the CES of protected areas. To address these limitations, we established a comprehensive framework for assessing the CES and selected Wuyishan National Park as a case study, a famous world heritage site attracting large numbers of visitors. A grounded approach was employed to analyze the composition of CES from visitors’ digital footprints data (N = 13,738), and kernel density estimation (KDE) and Geodetector were used to analyze spatial distribution and influencing factors. Results showed that recreation and leisure accounted for the highest proportion (47.63 %) of all the ten CES types derived from the coding of digital footprint data, while four categories of cultural ecosystem disservices (CEDS) constituted 13.15 % of the digital footprint coding count. Hot spots of CES were identified, which exhibited a pattern of higher values in the east and lower in the west. This pattern was primarily influenced by socio-economic factors such as GDP (q = 0.477), regional recreational popularity (q = 0.380), and population density (q = 0.363). The interaction between GDP and distance from the town center contributed significantly (q = 0.641). In the study, we expanded the methodology for quantitatively assessing CES in protected areas, revealing the spatial difference between CES and CEDS, offering scientific and well-founded references to achieve effective conservation and sustainable management for protected areas.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecosystem Services
Published
2024-11-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2024.101680
Citations
18
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.09

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cultural ecosystem services and disservices in protected areas: Hotspots and influencing factors based on tourists’ digital footprints

Yue Cao, Qiaochun Gan, Zuxin Xu, Lingyun Liao et al.
18 citations
Ecosystem Services
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
5.09
article

Cultural ecosystem services and disservices in protected areas: Hotspots and influencing factors based on tourists’ digital footprints

Yue Cao, Qiaochun Gan, Zuxin Xu, Lingyun Liao, Tianqi Fu, Xin Kang, Siren Lan, Jianwen Dong, Yunshuang Feng
article en
18 citations

Abstract

• 23 types of cultural ecosystem services hot spots were unveiled. • CEDS were identified, accounting for 13.5% of the coding results of digital footprint. • The interaction between GDP and urban proximity contributed most to CES distribution. • Grounded approach enhances digital footprint analysis in ecosystem service studies. Protected areas provide invaluable cultural ecosystem services, attracting increased attention. However, standardized evaluation criteria for cultural ecosystem services (CES) are still lacking, and the influencing factors remain largely unknown, making it difficult to fully understand the CES of protected areas. To address these limitations, we established a comprehensive framework for assessing the CES and selected Wuyishan National Park as a case study, a famous world heritage site attracting large numbers of visitors. A grounded approach was employed to analyze the composition of CES from visitors’ digital footprints data (N = 13,738), and kernel density estimation (KDE) and Geodetector were used to analyze spatial distribution and influencing factors. Results showed that recreation and leisure accounted for the highest proportion (47.63 %) of all the ten CES types derived from the coding of digital footprint data, while four categories of cultural ecosystem disservices (CEDS) constituted 13.15 % of the digital footprint coding count. Hot spots of CES were identified, which exhibited a pattern of higher values in the east and lower in the west. This pattern was primarily influenced by socio-economic factors such as GDP (q = 0.477), regional recreational popularity (q = 0.380), and population density (q = 0.363). The interaction between GDP and distance from the town center contributed significantly (q = 0.641). In the study, we expanded the methodology for quantitatively assessing CES in protected areas, revealing the spatial difference between CES and CEDS, offering scientific and well-founded references to achieve effective conservation and sustainable management for protected areas.

Ecosystem ServicesVol. 70
Wuyistar (China) (CN), Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
5.09
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.