Repositioning Forward-Leaning Occupants with a Pre-Pretensioner Belt in Static Conditions

<div>Extreme out-of-position pre-crash postures may need high-force pre-pretensioner (PPT) for effective repositioning (Mishra et al., <span>2023</span>). To avoid applying a high force on the chest, we hypothesized that in case of these extreme postures the PPT may be activated in the absence of a pre-crash motion as a cautionary measure. Therefore, the aims of this study were: (1) to understand the effect of the PPT in repositioning a forward-leaning occupant in static conditions and (2) to characterize occupants’ kinematic variability during repositioning. Sixteen healthy volunteers (8 males, 8 females, 23.8 ± 4.2 years old) were seated with a 40° forward posture on a vehicle seat and restrained with a 3-point seat belt equipped with a PPT. Two PPT seatbelt conditions were examined: low PPT (100 N) and high PPT (300 N). Head and trunk rearward displacements relative to the initial forward-leaning position at 350 ms from PPT onset were collected with a 3D motion-capture system and compared between sexes, repetitions, and PPT levels with repeated measure 3-way ANOVAs (p-level = 0.05). Head and trunk rearward displacements were greater with the high PPT (head −93.8 ± 9.3 mm, trunk −78.7 ± 6.7 mm) than the low PPT (head −44.6 ± 8.9 mm, trunk −39.7 ± 7.6 mm) (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between sexes (p > 0.19), repetition (p > 0.28), and no interaction effects (p > 0.18). There was greater inter-subject variability in the low (head −109.5 to −22.1 mm, trunk −105.0 to −17.5 mm) compared to high PPT (head −175.0 to −62.5 mm, trunk −128.4 to −54.8 mm). Although no sex differences were found, the high inter-subject variability suggests that PPT timing and force level might not be designed as one-size-fits-all. This study shows that triggering the PPT when the vehicle is traveling at a constant speed could reduce the PPT force needed to reposition forward-leaning occupants during pre-crash maneuvers.</div>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4271/09-12-02-0019
Primary Topic
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Repositioning Forward-Leaning Occupants with a Pre-Pretensioner Belt in Static Conditions

Maitland Witmer, Valentina Graci, Madeline Griffith
SAE International Journal of Transportation Safety
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
article

Repositioning Forward-Leaning Occupants with a Pre-Pretensioner Belt in Static Conditions

Maitland Witmer, Valentina Graci, Madeline Griffith
article en

Abstract

<div>Extreme out-of-position pre-crash postures may need high-force pre-pretensioner (PPT) for effective repositioning (Mishra et al., <span>2023</span>). To avoid applying a high force on the chest, we hypothesized that in case of these extreme postures the PPT may be activated in the absence of a pre-crash motion as a cautionary measure. Therefore, the aims of this study were: (1) to understand the effect of the PPT in repositioning a forward-leaning occupant in static conditions and (2) to characterize occupants’ kinematic variability during repositioning. Sixteen healthy volunteers (8 males, 8 females, 23.8 ± 4.2 years old) were seated with a 40° forward posture on a vehicle seat and restrained with a 3-point seat belt equipped with a PPT. Two PPT seatbelt conditions were examined: low PPT (100 N) and high PPT (300 N). Head and trunk rearward displacements relative to the initial forward-leaning position at 350 ms from PPT onset were collected with a 3D motion-capture system and compared between sexes, repetitions, and PPT levels with repeated measure 3-way ANOVAs (p-level = 0.05). Head and trunk rearward displacements were greater with the high PPT (head −93.8 ± 9.3 mm, trunk −78.7 ± 6.7 mm) than the low PPT (head −44.6 ± 8.9 mm, trunk −39.7 ± 7.6 mm) (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences between sexes (p > 0.19), repetition (p > 0.28), and no interaction effects (p > 0.18). There was greater inter-subject variability in the low (head −109.5 to −22.1 mm, trunk −105.0 to −17.5 mm) compared to high PPT (head −175.0 to −62.5 mm, trunk −128.4 to −54.8 mm). Although no sex differences were found, the high inter-subject variability suggests that PPT timing and force level might not be designed as one-size-fits-all. This study shows that triggering the PPT when the vehicle is traveling at a constant speed could reduce the PPT force needed to reposition forward-leaning occupants during pre-crash maneuvers.</div>

SAE International Journal of Transportation SafetyVol. 12(2)
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US), Drexel University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Manufacturing Process and Optimization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.