Phosphorus transport modeling in soils treated with nano-phosphorus fertilizers

Nanofertilizers play a promising role in crop production by reducing the application amount and increasing the application efficiency. Understanding the transport of plant nutrients in the soil is crucial for effectively managing nanofertilizer applications and minimizing their impact on the environment. This study investigated phosphorus transport in agricultural soil using 15-day and 30-day soil column experiment data from 2017 and 2018. Two soil column experiments were conducted using nano-rock phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite fertilizers, and a commercial fertilizer (single super phosphate). The Hydrus 1D model was used to understand the transport mechanism of nano and bulk phosphorus fertilizers. Water and dissolved phosphorus fluxes were simulated using leachate data, and key phosphorus transport parameters, including longitudinal dispersivity and the diffusion coefficient, were determined. The Hydrus-1D model accurately captured leachate dynamics (R² = 0.82–0.99 and MAE = 0.38–0.56 cm/days). Phosphorus transport performed well for bulk fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.86–0.90, MAE = 0.08–0.19 ppm, and RMSE = 0.14–0.36 ppm). However, mixed results were obtained while validating nano fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.31–0.98, MAE = 0.046–0.41 ppm, and RMSE = 0.084–0.35 ppm). For nanofertilizers, the longitudinal dispersivity and distribution coefficient were reduced by 80.71 % and 19.20 %, respectively, compared to commercial fertilizers. The lower longitudinal dispersivity indicates that nano fertilizers release nutrients more slowly than bulk fertilizers. Similarly, a smaller distribution coefficient suggests that nano-phosphorus fertilizers are more concentrated in specific areas within the soil, leading to slower and more controlled nutrient distribution. Additionally, the leachate's observed total phosphorus concentration and the soil profile's phosphorus concentration support the study findings. The results indicate that the transport mechanism of nano and bulk fertilizers in soil is distinct and should be treated separately. This study's findings will contribute to developing optimal fertilizer application strategies for nano-phosphorus fertilizers. • Hydrus 1D model was used to study phosphorus transport in soils treated with nano phosphorus fertilizers. • Phosphorus transport differs for nanofertilizers, requiring separate Hydrus calibration for nanofertilizers. • Nano fertilizers showed reduced longitudinal dispersivity (80.71%) and distribution coefficient (19.20%) compared to bulk fertilizers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plant Nano Biology
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plana.2024.100112
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Phosphorus and nutrient management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.76
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Phosphorus transport modeling in soils treated with nano-phosphorus fertilizers

Kartik Jadav, Damodhara Rao Mailapalli, Maheshwar Durgam, Monisha Perli
6 citations
Plant Nano Biology
Phosphorus and nutrient management
1.76
article

Phosphorus transport modeling in soils treated with nano-phosphorus fertilizers

Kartik Jadav, Damodhara Rao Mailapalli, Maheshwar Durgam, Monisha Perli
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Nanofertilizers play a promising role in crop production by reducing the application amount and increasing the application efficiency. Understanding the transport of plant nutrients in the soil is crucial for effectively managing nanofertilizer applications and minimizing their impact on the environment. This study investigated phosphorus transport in agricultural soil using 15-day and 30-day soil column experiment data from 2017 and 2018. Two soil column experiments were conducted using nano-rock phosphate, nano-hydroxyapatite fertilizers, and a commercial fertilizer (single super phosphate). The Hydrus 1D model was used to understand the transport mechanism of nano and bulk phosphorus fertilizers. Water and dissolved phosphorus fluxes were simulated using leachate data, and key phosphorus transport parameters, including longitudinal dispersivity and the diffusion coefficient, were determined. The Hydrus-1D model accurately captured leachate dynamics (R² = 0.82–0.99 and MAE = 0.38–0.56 cm/days). Phosphorus transport performed well for bulk fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.86–0.90, MAE = 0.08–0.19 ppm, and RMSE = 0.14–0.36 ppm). However, mixed results were obtained while validating nano fertilizer treatments (R² = 0.31–0.98, MAE = 0.046–0.41 ppm, and RMSE = 0.084–0.35 ppm). For nanofertilizers, the longitudinal dispersivity and distribution coefficient were reduced by 80.71 % and 19.20 %, respectively, compared to commercial fertilizers. The lower longitudinal dispersivity indicates that nano fertilizers release nutrients more slowly than bulk fertilizers. Similarly, a smaller distribution coefficient suggests that nano-phosphorus fertilizers are more concentrated in specific areas within the soil, leading to slower and more controlled nutrient distribution. Additionally, the leachate's observed total phosphorus concentration and the soil profile's phosphorus concentration support the study findings. The results indicate that the transport mechanism of nano and bulk fertilizers in soil is distinct and should be treated separately. This study's findings will contribute to developing optimal fertilizer application strategies for nano-phosphorus fertilizers. • Hydrus 1D model was used to study phosphorus transport in soils treated with nano phosphorus fertilizers. • Phosphorus transport differs for nanofertilizers, requiring separate Hydrus calibration for nanofertilizers. • Nano fertilizers showed reduced longitudinal dispersivity (80.71%) and distribution coefficient (19.20%) compared to bulk fertilizers.

Plant Nano BiologyVol. 10
Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IN)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Phosphorus and nutrient management
1.76
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.