Physical And Chemical Characterization Of Substrates Formed By Different Source Material

Background: The search for the ideal substrate that does not burden the production system is the key to discovering different components that, together, may have all the physical and chemical characteristics suitable for full plants development. Therefore, it is essential to find cheap, local alternatives and, at the same time, dispose of materials with high pollutant potential, such as agro-industrial waste. The present study aimed to characterize the physical and chemical characteristics of substrates formed by different materials of different origin and quantities. Materials and Methods: The experiment was developed at the Experimental Farm Laboratory of the Federal University of Grande Dourados, in a completely randomized design, with four substrates (treatments) and five replicates. All substrates were formed by the same quantities of sugarcane ash (20%), coarse sand (10%) and swine biological sludge (10%). Substrate A was formed by 30% sugarcane bagasse, 10% vermiculite, 10% sugarcane filter cake and 10% chicken litter; substrate B was formed by 20% sugarcane bagasse, 20% sugarcane filter cake and 20% chicken litter; substrate C was formed by 10% vermiculite, 10% sugarcane filter cake, 10% chicken litter and 30% sugarcane straw; finally, substrate D was formed by 20% sugarcane filter cake, 20% chicken litter and 20% sugarcane straw. The characteristics evaluated were: current moisture content, wet density, dry density, water retention capacity at 10 cm, total porosity, aeration space, available water, particle size, percentage of moisture loss, pH and electrical conductivity. Results: Substrates A and B may be indicated for use in pots measuring 20 to 30 cm in height, depending on the dry density, while substrates C and D may be used in pots larger than 30 cm. Total porosity and available water of all substrates presented values considered ideal. Conclusion: The values indicated in the theoretical reference of the literature indicate the substrates as nonadequate due to the high pH value, however, this indication may be reassessed depending on the species of plant that will be cultivated, while the electrical conductivity is in the range considered ideal for cultivation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science
Published
2024-11-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.9790/2380-1711012431
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Physical And Chemical Characterization Of Substrates Formed By Different Source Material

Magaly de Fátima Correia, Fabio da Silva Ribeiro, J. Alves, Maximiliano Kawahata Pagliarini et al.
1 citations
IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary Science
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
article

Physical And Chemical Characterization Of Substrates Formed By Different Source Material

Magaly de Fátima Correia, Fabio da Silva Ribeiro, J. Alves, Maximiliano Kawahata Pagliarini, Luis Fabiano Arantes Cassulino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: The search for the ideal substrate that does not burden the production system is the key to discovering different components that, together, may have all the physical and chemical characteristics suitable for full plants development. Therefore, it is essential to find cheap, local alternatives and, at the same time, dispose of materials with high pollutant potential, such as agro-industrial waste. The present study aimed to characterize the physical and chemical characteristics of substrates formed by different materials of different origin and quantities. Materials and Methods: The experiment was developed at the Experimental Farm Laboratory of the Federal University of Grande Dourados, in a completely randomized design, with four substrates (treatments) and five replicates. All substrates were formed by the same quantities of sugarcane ash (20%), coarse sand (10%) and swine biological sludge (10%). Substrate A was formed by 30% sugarcane bagasse, 10% vermiculite, 10% sugarcane filter cake and 10% chicken litter; substrate B was formed by 20% sugarcane bagasse, 20% sugarcane filter cake and 20% chicken litter; substrate C was formed by 10% vermiculite, 10% sugarcane filter cake, 10% chicken litter and 30% sugarcane straw; finally, substrate D was formed by 20% sugarcane filter cake, 20% chicken litter and 20% sugarcane straw. The characteristics evaluated were: current moisture content, wet density, dry density, water retention capacity at 10 cm, total porosity, aeration space, available water, particle size, percentage of moisture loss, pH and electrical conductivity. Results: Substrates A and B may be indicated for use in pots measuring 20 to 30 cm in height, depending on the dry density, while substrates C and D may be used in pots larger than 30 cm. Total porosity and available water of all substrates presented values considered ideal. Conclusion: The values indicated in the theoretical reference of the literature indicate the substrates as nonadequate due to the high pH value, however, this indication may be reassessed depending on the species of plant that will be cultivated, while the electrical conductivity is in the range considered ideal for cultivation.

IOSR Journal of Agriculture and Veterinary ScienceVol. 17(11)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
0.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.