Visual explainability of 250 skin diseases viewed through the eyes of an AI‐based, self‐supervised vision transformer—A clinical perspective

Abstract Background Conventional supervised deep‐learning approaches mostly focus on a small range of skin disease images. Recently, self‐supervised (SS) Vision Transformers have emerged, capturing complex visual patterns in hundreds of classes without any need for tedious image annotation. Objectives This study aimed to form the basis for an inexpensive and explainable AI system, targeted at the vastness of clinical skin diagnoses by comparing so‐called ‘self‐attention maps’ of an SS and a supervised ViT on 250 skin diseases—visualizations showing areas of interest for each skin disease. Methods Using a public data set containing images of 250 different skin diseases, one small ViT was pretrained S) for 300 epochs (=ViT‐SS), and two were fine‐tuned supervised from ImageNet‐weights for 300 epochs (=ViT‐300) and for 78 epochs due to heavier regularization (=ViT‐78), respectively. The models generated 250 self‐attention maps each. These maps were analyzed in a blinded manner using a ‘DermAttention’ score, and the models were primarily compared based on their ability to focus on disease‐relevant features. Results Visual analysis revealed that ViT‐SS delivered superior self‐attention‐maps. It scored a significantly higher accuracy of focusing on disease‐defining lesions (88%; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 0.840–0.920) compared to ViT‐300 (78.4%; CI 95%: 0.733–0.835; p < 0.05) and ViT‐78 (51.2%; CI 95%: 0.450–0.574; p < 0.05). It also exceeded in other subcategories of ‘DermAttention’. Conclusions SS pretraining did not translate to better diagnostic performance when compared to conventional supervision. However, it led to more accurate visual representations of varying skin disease images. These findings may pave the way for large‐scale, explainable computer‐aided skin diagnostic in an unfiltered clinical setting. Further research is needed to improve clinical outcomes using these visual tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JEADV Clinical Practice
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jvc2.580
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual explainability of 250 skin diseases viewed through the eyes of an AI‐based, self‐supervised vision transformer—A clinical perspective

Christian Posch, Ramy Abdel Mawgoud
3 citations
JEADV Clinical Practice
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
0.85
article

Visual explainability of 250 skin diseases viewed through the eyes of an AI‐based, self‐supervised vision transformer—A clinical perspective

Christian Posch, Ramy Abdel Mawgoud
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Background Conventional supervised deep‐learning approaches mostly focus on a small range of skin disease images. Recently, self‐supervised (SS) Vision Transformers have emerged, capturing complex visual patterns in hundreds of classes without any need for tedious image annotation. Objectives This study aimed to form the basis for an inexpensive and explainable AI system, targeted at the vastness of clinical skin diagnoses by comparing so‐called ‘self‐attention maps’ of an SS and a supervised ViT on 250 skin diseases—visualizations showing areas of interest for each skin disease. Methods Using a public data set containing images of 250 different skin diseases, one small ViT was pretrained S) for 300 epochs (=ViT‐SS), and two were fine‐tuned supervised from ImageNet‐weights for 300 epochs (=ViT‐300) and for 78 epochs due to heavier regularization (=ViT‐78), respectively. The models generated 250 self‐attention maps each. These maps were analyzed in a blinded manner using a ‘DermAttention’ score, and the models were primarily compared based on their ability to focus on disease‐relevant features. Results Visual analysis revealed that ViT‐SS delivered superior self‐attention‐maps. It scored a significantly higher accuracy of focusing on disease‐defining lesions (88%; confidence interval [CI] 95%: 0.840–0.920) compared to ViT‐300 (78.4%; CI 95%: 0.733–0.835; p < 0.05) and ViT‐78 (51.2%; CI 95%: 0.450–0.574; p < 0.05). It also exceeded in other subcategories of ‘DermAttention’. Conclusions SS pretraining did not translate to better diagnostic performance when compared to conventional supervision. However, it led to more accurate visual representations of varying skin disease images. These findings may pave the way for large‐scale, explainable computer‐aided skin diagnostic in an unfiltered clinical setting. Further research is needed to improve clinical outcomes using these visual tools.

JEADV Clinical PracticeVol. 4(1)
Sigmund Freud Privatuniversität Wien (AT), Klinik Hietzing (AT), Technical University of Munich (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.