The Evaluation of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for Assessing Neurology Cases Among Postgraduate Medicine Students

Background Traditional assessments in postgraduate medical training tend to emphasize cognitive skills while often neglecting the psychomotor and affective domains. The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) addresses these limitations by evaluating clinical, communication, and humanistic skills with immediate feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the mini-CEX in assessing neurology cases among postgraduate internal medicine students at a medical college in North India. Methods Between March and July 2024, 10 postgraduate medicine students and 14 faculty members participated in the study. Each student completed at least four mini-CEX sessions, during which performance across seven core skills was rated using a nine-point scale. Immediate feedback was provided by faculty following each session. Both student and faculty feedback were collected to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the mini-CEX. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate these factors, while paired t-tests were applied to measure improvements in student performance. Results A total of 63 mini-CEX sessions were conducted, with an average observation time of 18.77 minutes and an average feedback time of 10.08 minutes. Significant improvements in clinical skills were observed among second-year (P = 0.04) and third-year (P = 0.01) residents, with second-year residents also showing gains in humanistic skills (P = 0.03). Student feedback was largely positive, with nine out of 10 (90%) participants expressing satisfaction and eight out of 10 (80%) recommending the continued use of the tool. Faculty feedback indicated that 10 of 14 (71.4%) supported its continued use and eight of 14 (57%) found it better than traditional assessment methods. Conclusions The mini-CEX is a feasible and acceptable formative assessment tool for neurology cases, effectively enhancing clinical and communication skills. Despite concerns regarding subjectivity, the mini-CEX shows promise for wider implementation in postgraduate, and potentially undergraduate, medical training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2024-11-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.73641
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evaluation of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for Assessing Neurology Cases Among Postgraduate Medicine Students

Shahina Islam, Azhar Uddin, Rosmy Jose, Afreen Khan
3 citations
Cureus
Innovations in Medical Education
1.63
article

The Evaluation of Mini-Clinical Evaluation Exercise (Mini-CEX) for Assessing Neurology Cases Among Postgraduate Medicine Students

Shahina Islam, Azhar Uddin, Rosmy Jose, Afreen Khan
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Background Traditional assessments in postgraduate medical training tend to emphasize cognitive skills while often neglecting the psychomotor and affective domains. The mini-clinical evaluation exercise (mini-CEX) addresses these limitations by evaluating clinical, communication, and humanistic skills with immediate feedback. This study aimed to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of the mini-CEX in assessing neurology cases among postgraduate internal medicine students at a medical college in North India. Methods Between March and July 2024, 10 postgraduate medicine students and 14 faculty members participated in the study. Each student completed at least four mini-CEX sessions, during which performance across seven core skills was rated using a nine-point scale. Immediate feedback was provided by faculty following each session. Both student and faculty feedback were collected to assess the acceptability and feasibility of the mini-CEX. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate these factors, while paired t-tests were applied to measure improvements in student performance. Results A total of 63 mini-CEX sessions were conducted, with an average observation time of 18.77 minutes and an average feedback time of 10.08 minutes. Significant improvements in clinical skills were observed among second-year (P = 0.04) and third-year (P = 0.01) residents, with second-year residents also showing gains in humanistic skills (P = 0.03). Student feedback was largely positive, with nine out of 10 (90%) participants expressing satisfaction and eight out of 10 (80%) recommending the continued use of the tool. Faculty feedback indicated that 10 of 14 (71.4%) supported its continued use and eight of 14 (57%) found it better than traditional assessment methods. Conclusions The mini-CEX is a feasible and acceptable formative assessment tool for neurology cases, effectively enhancing clinical and communication skills. Despite concerns regarding subjectivity, the mini-CEX shows promise for wider implementation in postgraduate, and potentially undergraduate, medical training.

CureusVol. 16(11)
Jamia Hamdard (IN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Innovations in Medical Education
1.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.