Abstract 4138915: Exploring mediation through major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants and cardiovascular (CV) events

Introduction: Although extracranial major bleeding (EMB) is often transient and manageable with supportive care, there is concern that EMB may have a subsequent detrimental effect on CV outcomes. However, a causal relationship is unclear, because the association is often confounded by underlying disease and comorbidities. Clinical trial data for more comprehensive analyses via advanced modeling are limited. Research Question: What is the effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on CV outcomes mediated through EMB? Aim: To determine the extent of the effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on CV outcomes that is mediated through their differential impact on EMB using a novel, advanced modeling approach (EUPAS1000000168). Methods: Using 5 US observational databases from routine clinical practice (01-11-2010 to 31-12-2022), adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were identified to establish the target and comparator cohorts, with 1 st exposure as index date. Treatment balance was achieved by matching on propensity scores derived from large-scale regularized regression. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the main effect on CV outcomes (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and composite endpoint) for rivaroxaban vs warfarin, with target and comparator time-at-risk right-censored at therapy end or switch, event occurrence, or database observation end. The EMB mediation effect on outcomes was estimated by including EMB as time-varying covariate, while controlling mediator-outcome confounding by including a mediator risk score in the outcome model. Comparative analyses were conducted only when pre-specified diagnostics passed for covariate balance, equipoise, and systematic error estimated through negative controls. Results: In 5 databases, 378,384 rivaroxaban initiators were matched to 601,174 warfarin initiators with NVAF. Common comorbidities included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and heart failure. Main effects and indirect effects (mediation effects) are in Table A. Conclusion: This analysis suggested that EMB had no impact on the effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on CV outcomes. A limitation is that EMB occurrence and CV events after EMB were limited, which reduced mediation impact.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138915
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138915: Exploring mediation through major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants and cardiovascular (CV) events

Elliot S. Barnathan, Martijn J. Schuemie, James Weaver, Žhong Yuan
Circulation
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4138915: Exploring mediation through major bleeding between direct oral anticoagulants and cardiovascular (CV) events

Elliot S. Barnathan, Martijn J. Schuemie, James Weaver, Žhong Yuan
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Although extracranial major bleeding (EMB) is often transient and manageable with supportive care, there is concern that EMB may have a subsequent detrimental effect on CV outcomes. However, a causal relationship is unclear, because the association is often confounded by underlying disease and comorbidities. Clinical trial data for more comprehensive analyses via advanced modeling are limited. Research Question: What is the effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on CV outcomes mediated through EMB? Aim: To determine the extent of the effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on CV outcomes that is mediated through their differential impact on EMB using a novel, advanced modeling approach (EUPAS1000000168). Methods: Using 5 US observational databases from routine clinical practice (01-11-2010 to 31-12-2022), adult patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) were identified to establish the target and comparator cohorts, with 1 st exposure as index date. Treatment balance was achieved by matching on propensity scores derived from large-scale regularized regression. Cox proportional hazards models estimated the main effect on CV outcomes (myocardial infarction, ischemic stroke, and composite endpoint) for rivaroxaban vs warfarin, with target and comparator time-at-risk right-censored at therapy end or switch, event occurrence, or database observation end. The EMB mediation effect on outcomes was estimated by including EMB as time-varying covariate, while controlling mediator-outcome confounding by including a mediator risk score in the outcome model. Comparative analyses were conducted only when pre-specified diagnostics passed for covariate balance, equipoise, and systematic error estimated through negative controls. Results: In 5 databases, 378,384 rivaroxaban initiators were matched to 601,174 warfarin initiators with NVAF. Common comorbidities included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, and heart failure. Main effects and indirect effects (mediation effects) are in Table A. Conclusion: This analysis suggested that EMB had no impact on the effect of rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on CV outcomes. A limitation is that EMB occurrence and CV events after EMB were limited, which reduced mediation impact.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Johnson & Johnson (United States) (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.