Abstract 4139355: Improvement in Cardiorespiratory Fitness During Cardiac Rehabilitation: Effect of Smoking Status

Background: Patients who smoke have high-risk cardiovascular profiles. However, it is less well-known whether smoking interferes with gains made during cardiac rehabilitation (CR), such as improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO 2peak ). Hypothesis: Current smoking impedes improvement in VO 2peak during CR. Aims: To determine if smoking status was independently associated with improvement in directly measured VO 2peak . Methods: Data were obtained from a prospectively collected clinical database at the University of Vermont Medical Center. Individuals were included if data was available on entry and exit VO 2peak (measured during a symptom-limited treadmill test) and self-reported smoking status (current, former, or never). Data were extracted on sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity score (severity of exercise-limiting comorbidities) and number of CR sessions completed. Analyses of variance and linear regressions were used to test for associations between the aforementioned variables and change in VO 2peak . Variables with significant associations were entered into multivariable general linear models predicting change in VO 2peak . Results: 2390 patients (111 current, 1114 former and 1165 never smokers) were included. Current smokers differed significantly from former/never smokers, being younger (58.3±10.8 vs. 65.4±10.2 and 64.2±11.2), having higher comorbidity scores (0.8±1.4 vs. 0.6±1.2 and 0.5±1.0), and attending fewer CR sessions (25.3±11.1 vs. 29.5±9.2 and 29.1±9.6). All variables examined were significantly associated with change in VO 2peak except for number of CR sessions attended and remained significantly associated with change in VO 2peak in the multivariable models. Estimated mean improvement (controlling for other variables) in VO 2peak was [mean(SE)]: 1.6(0.3), 2.8(0.1), and 3.2(0.1) mLO 2 *kg-1*min-1 in current, former, and never smokers, respectively. Percent improvement in VO 2peak also varied across groups [11.6(2.1), 16.8(0.7), and 18.2(0.7)%]. In both models, improvement in the current smoking group was significantly less than the other two groups (ps<.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Smoking status at CR entry was significantly, independently associated with improvement in VO 2peak during CR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139355
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139355: Improvement in Cardiorespiratory Fitness During Cardiac Rehabilitation: Effect of Smoking Status

Sherrie Khadanga, Diann E. Gaalema, Michael DeSarno, Philip A. Ades et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Abstract 4139355: Improvement in Cardiorespiratory Fitness During Cardiac Rehabilitation: Effect of Smoking Status

Sherrie Khadanga, Diann E. Gaalema, Michael DeSarno, Philip A. Ades, Patrick D. Savage
article en

Abstract

Background: Patients who smoke have high-risk cardiovascular profiles. However, it is less well-known whether smoking interferes with gains made during cardiac rehabilitation (CR), such as improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness (VO 2peak ). Hypothesis: Current smoking impedes improvement in VO 2peak during CR. Aims: To determine if smoking status was independently associated with improvement in directly measured VO 2peak . Methods: Data were obtained from a prospectively collected clinical database at the University of Vermont Medical Center. Individuals were included if data was available on entry and exit VO 2peak (measured during a symptom-limited treadmill test) and self-reported smoking status (current, former, or never). Data were extracted on sex, age, body mass index, comorbidity score (severity of exercise-limiting comorbidities) and number of CR sessions completed. Analyses of variance and linear regressions were used to test for associations between the aforementioned variables and change in VO 2peak . Variables with significant associations were entered into multivariable general linear models predicting change in VO 2peak . Results: 2390 patients (111 current, 1114 former and 1165 never smokers) were included. Current smokers differed significantly from former/never smokers, being younger (58.3±10.8 vs. 65.4±10.2 and 64.2±11.2), having higher comorbidity scores (0.8±1.4 vs. 0.6±1.2 and 0.5±1.0), and attending fewer CR sessions (25.3±11.1 vs. 29.5±9.2 and 29.1±9.6). All variables examined were significantly associated with change in VO 2peak except for number of CR sessions attended and remained significantly associated with change in VO 2peak in the multivariable models. Estimated mean improvement (controlling for other variables) in VO 2peak was [mean(SE)]: 1.6(0.3), 2.8(0.1), and 3.2(0.1) mLO 2 *kg-1*min-1 in current, former, and never smokers, respectively. Percent improvement in VO 2peak also varied across groups [11.6(2.1), 16.8(0.7), and 18.2(0.7)%]. In both models, improvement in the current smoking group was significantly less than the other two groups (ps<.05 for all comparisons). Conclusion: Smoking status at CR entry was significantly, independently associated with improvement in VO 2peak during CR.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Vermont (US), Williston State College (US), University of Vermont Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.