Abstract 4139457: The Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Congestive Heart Failure Patients Who Also Have End Stage Renal Disease

Introduction: The PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated that angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor was superior to enalapril in reducing risks of death and hospitalization for heart failure; however, the trial excluded patients with a GFR <30mL/min/1.73m2. This poses limited data when treating patients with concomitant congestive heart failure (CHF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We observe the effects of sacubitril-valsartan on all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), ventilation requirements, hyperkalemia, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in patients with both CHF and ESRD. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort on patients diagnosed with CHF and ESRD (defined as a GFR below <15mL/min/1.73m2) from 01/01/2017 to 06/01/2023 across 16 West Florida hospitals. Patients receiving sacubitril-valsartan were compared to those not taking sacubitril-valsartan. Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used to predict the clinical outcomes of all-cause mortality, AKI, ventilation requirements, hyperkalemia, and ICU admissions between the two groups. Results: Among 18,116 patients with CHF and ESRD, 712 (3.9%) were taking sacubitril-valsartan and 17,406 (96.1%) were not taking sacubitril-valsartan. Among those taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not, similar likelihood was seen in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.47; p=0.8325), hyperkalemia (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.05; p=0.1464), and ICU admissions (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.02; p=0.0825). The likelihood of AKI was higher in patients taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.43; p=0.0330). There was a significantly less likelihood of ventilation requirement among those taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.92; p=0.003). Conclusion: In patients with concomitant CHF and ESRD, the odds of all-cause mortality, hyperkalemia, and ICU admissions were similar among patients taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not. Patients taking sacubitril-valsartan were less likely to require ventilation but more likely to develop AKI. Although these patients are more likely to develop AKI, this does not significantly impact mortality rate. This study highlights outcomes excluded in the PARADIGM-HF trial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139457
Primary Topic
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139457: The Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Congestive Heart Failure Patients Who Also Have End Stage Renal Disease

Abraheim Al-Nasseri, Nishant Nerella, Steven Mirabella, Suman Pasupuleti et al.
Circulation
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
article

Abstract 4139457: The Efficacy of Sacubitril-Valsartan in Congestive Heart Failure Patients Who Also Have End Stage Renal Disease

Abraheim Al-Nasseri, Nishant Nerella, Steven Mirabella, Suman Pasupuleti, Usman Kazi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: The PARADIGM-HF trial demonstrated that angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor was superior to enalapril in reducing risks of death and hospitalization for heart failure; however, the trial excluded patients with a GFR <30mL/min/1.73m2. This poses limited data when treating patients with concomitant congestive heart failure (CHF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We observe the effects of sacubitril-valsartan on all-cause mortality, acute kidney injury (AKI), ventilation requirements, hyperkalemia, and intensive care unit (ICU) admissions in patients with both CHF and ESRD. Methods: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort on patients diagnosed with CHF and ESRD (defined as a GFR below <15mL/min/1.73m2) from 01/01/2017 to 06/01/2023 across 16 West Florida hospitals. Patients receiving sacubitril-valsartan were compared to those not taking sacubitril-valsartan. Chi-square and binary logistic regression were used to predict the clinical outcomes of all-cause mortality, AKI, ventilation requirements, hyperkalemia, and ICU admissions between the two groups. Results: Among 18,116 patients with CHF and ESRD, 712 (3.9%) were taking sacubitril-valsartan and 17,406 (96.1%) were not taking sacubitril-valsartan. Among those taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not, similar likelihood was seen in terms of all-cause mortality (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.47; p=0.8325), hyperkalemia (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.73-1.05; p=0.1464), and ICU admissions (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.73-1.02; p=0.0825). The likelihood of AKI was higher in patients taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.43; p=0.0330). There was a significantly less likelihood of ventilation requirement among those taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.67-0.92; p=0.003). Conclusion: In patients with concomitant CHF and ESRD, the odds of all-cause mortality, hyperkalemia, and ICU admissions were similar among patients taking sacubitril-valsartan compared to those who were not. Patients taking sacubitril-valsartan were less likely to require ventilation but more likely to develop AKI. Although these patients are more likely to develop AKI, this does not significantly impact mortality rate. This study highlights outcomes excluded in the PARADIGM-HF trial.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Orange County Healthcare Agency (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Heart Failure Treatment and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.