Abstract 4138176: Identifying Clinical Stability After Heart Failure Discharge: A machine learning-based decision aid based on continuous ECG and accelerometry

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is typified by disease exacerbations resulting in high readmission rate and mortality. Continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) and activity (ACT) data offer promise of a scalable noninvasive solution that may reduce 30-day readmissions. Using a data-driven approach, we developed a machine learning (ML) model including the FDA-cleared multivariate change index (MCI) to identify HF patients at low risk for near-term decompensation. Methods: The LINK-HF clinical trials used the Prolaio system to continuously record physiological parameters using a wearable device. We used ML to build predictive models of a composite outcome of near-term (7-day) risk of emergency room use, hospitalization or death. The model was derived using data from the previously published LINK-HF1 study (2015-2016), and externally validated using data from the control arm of the LINK-HF2 trial (2021-2024). Covariates were developed in LINK-HF1 and a selection procedure used the bootstrap to identify the 100 covariates most commonly chosen when training a ML model to classify patients into high vs. low near-term risk. All combinations of the top 3 covariates were then used to develop the final model. The best-performing model in the training set was evaluated in the validation set. Results: Patient data were segmented into 7-day windows, yielding 4,243 training windows (200 [4.7%] with events) and 3,551 validation windows (109 [3.1%] with events) (Fig. 1A). The chosen model utilized covariates related to changes in heart rate, atrial fibrillation burden, and MCI to achieve an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 73% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 69-76%) in the validation set. The model stratified patients into high and low risk, with a Hazard Ratio (HR) for the outcome of 3.9 (95% CI, 2.7-5.6; P-value, 4 x 10-13) in the validation set (Fig. 1B). Conclusions: Using multivariable wearable sensor data and ML, we developed a model able to identify HF patients at low vs. high near-term risk for decompensation. Future work will determine how this knowledge may optimize and personalize HF care, improving outcomes and efficiency in care delivery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4138176
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4138176: Identifying Clinical Stability After Heart Failure Discharge: A machine learning-based decision aid based on continuous ECG and accelerometry

Thomas C. Hanff, Stylianos Serghiou, Konstantinos Sideris, Michael J. Koren et al.
Circulation
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Abstract 4138176: Identifying Clinical Stability After Heart Failure Discharge: A machine learning-based decision aid based on continuous ECG and accelerometry

Thomas C. Hanff, Stylianos Serghiou, Konstantinos Sideris, Michael J. Koren, Lina Brinker, Claire Martin, Erick Andres Perez Alday, Matt Pipke, Karim Sallam, Stephan Wegerich, Heather Hanson, Josef Stehlik, Jadranka Sekaric, Jay M. Edelberg, Carsten Schmalfuss, Neil P. Lewis, Srilakshmi Alla, Steven R. Steinhubl, Gregory Kurio, Miguel Cacho-Soblechero
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Heart failure (HF) is typified by disease exacerbations resulting in high readmission rate and mortality. Continuous electrocardiographic (ECG) and activity (ACT) data offer promise of a scalable noninvasive solution that may reduce 30-day readmissions. Using a data-driven approach, we developed a machine learning (ML) model including the FDA-cleared multivariate change index (MCI) to identify HF patients at low risk for near-term decompensation. Methods: The LINK-HF clinical trials used the Prolaio system to continuously record physiological parameters using a wearable device. We used ML to build predictive models of a composite outcome of near-term (7-day) risk of emergency room use, hospitalization or death. The model was derived using data from the previously published LINK-HF1 study (2015-2016), and externally validated using data from the control arm of the LINK-HF2 trial (2021-2024). Covariates were developed in LINK-HF1 and a selection procedure used the bootstrap to identify the 100 covariates most commonly chosen when training a ML model to classify patients into high vs. low near-term risk. All combinations of the top 3 covariates were then used to develop the final model. The best-performing model in the training set was evaluated in the validation set. Results: Patient data were segmented into 7-day windows, yielding 4,243 training windows (200 [4.7%] with events) and 3,551 validation windows (109 [3.1%] with events) (Fig. 1A). The chosen model utilized covariates related to changes in heart rate, atrial fibrillation burden, and MCI to achieve an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 73% (95% Confidence Interval [CI], 69-76%) in the validation set. The model stratified patients into high and low risk, with a Hazard Ratio (HR) for the outcome of 3.9 (95% CI, 2.7-5.6; P-value, 4 x 10-13) in the validation set (Fig. 1B). Conclusions: Using multivariable wearable sensor data and ML, we developed a model able to identify HF patients at low vs. high near-term risk for decompensation. Future work will determine how this knowledge may optimize and personalize HF care, improving outcomes and efficiency in care delivery.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Princeton University (US), VA Palo Alto Health Care System (US), University of Utah (US), Jacksonville University (US), Lake City VA Medical Center (US), Malcom Randall VA Medical Center (US), Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.