Abstract 4139436: Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure

Introduction: Less than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receive all four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Understanding disparities in sex, race, ethnicity, and adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy. Methods: Utilizing the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines® Heart Failure registry, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to examine the associations between exposures of race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse SDoH (insurance status and a documented social need [any barrier to accessing healthcare]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) at discharge in patients with HFrEF hospitalized between 7/1/2021-9/30/2023. The outcome was a novel QTO score incorporating SGLT2Is as a pillar of quadruple therapy (Figure 1A). Associations between each exposure and QTO score were assessed using multivariable adjusted linear models to calculate adjusted mean differences (AMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 82,637 included patients (median age 66.0 years, 32.5% female, 57.0% non-Hispanic White, 76.4% prior HF), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (standard deviation 25.5). The use of each GDMT component is shown in Figure 1B. After adjustment, Non-Hispanic Black (AMD 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.17, 2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD 0.73 percentage points [95% CI, 0.13, 1.33]) had higher QTO scores vs. Non-Hispanic White individuals. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD 1.93 percentage points [95% CI, 1.56, 2.29]). Patients with Medicaid/no insurance (AMD -1.30 percentage points [95% CI, -1.71, -0.88]) and Medicare (AMD -1.70 percentage points [95% CI, -2.16, -1.23]) had lower QTO scores vs. private insurance (Figure 1C). Those with vs. without an identified social need had lower QTO scores (AMD -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10, -2.71]) (Figure 1D). Conclusion: Disparities in quadruple therapy optimization were most evident for patients with adverse SDoH. Patients with Medicaid/no insurance, Medicare, or an identified social need had lower QTO scores. Future efforts should focus on reducing these gaps to improve equitable GDMT use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139436
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139436: Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure

Iyanuoluwa Ayodele, Stephen John Greene, Rosalia Blanco, Brooke Alhanti et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
article

Abstract 4139436: Social Determinants of Health and Disparities in Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Optimization for Heart Failure

Iyanuoluwa Ayodele, Stephen John Greene, Rosalia Blanco, Brooke Alhanti, Ambarish Pandey, Joshua A. Jacobs, Catherine G. Derington, Madeline R. Sterling, Kevin Shah, Alexander R. Zheutlin, Gregg C. Fonarow, Adam P. Bress
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Less than 20% of eligible patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) receive all four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT). Understanding disparities in sex, race, ethnicity, and adverse social determinants of health (SDoH) is necessary to equitably optimize quadruple therapy. Methods: Utilizing the American Heart Association Get With The Guidelines® Heart Failure registry, we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to examine the associations between exposures of race and ethnicity, sex, and adverse SDoH (insurance status and a documented social need [any barrier to accessing healthcare]) with quadruple therapy optimization (QTO) at discharge in patients with HFrEF hospitalized between 7/1/2021-9/30/2023. The outcome was a novel QTO score incorporating SGLT2Is as a pillar of quadruple therapy (Figure 1A). Associations between each exposure and QTO score were assessed using multivariable adjusted linear models to calculate adjusted mean differences (AMDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: Among 82,637 included patients (median age 66.0 years, 32.5% female, 57.0% non-Hispanic White, 76.4% prior HF), the overall mean QTO score was 56.2% (standard deviation 25.5). The use of each GDMT component is shown in Figure 1B. After adjustment, Non-Hispanic Black (AMD 2.56 percentage points [95% CI, 2.17, 2.96]) and Hispanic individuals (AMD 0.73 percentage points [95% CI, 0.13, 1.33]) had higher QTO scores vs. Non-Hispanic White individuals. Females had higher QTO scores than males (AMD 1.93 percentage points [95% CI, 1.56, 2.29]). Patients with Medicaid/no insurance (AMD -1.30 percentage points [95% CI, -1.71, -0.88]) and Medicare (AMD -1.70 percentage points [95% CI, -2.16, -1.23]) had lower QTO scores vs. private insurance (Figure 1C). Those with vs. without an identified social need had lower QTO scores (AMD -3.40 percentage points [95% CI, -4.10, -2.71]) (Figure 1D). Conclusion: Disparities in quadruple therapy optimization were most evident for patients with adverse SDoH. Patients with Medicaid/no insurance, Medicare, or an identified social need had lower QTO scores. Future efforts should focus on reducing these gaps to improve equitable GDMT use.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Northwestern University (US), Duke University (US), Cornell University (US), University of Utah (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.