Abstract 4139026: Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesteremia (FH) Among Participants in the ACCELERATE Trial: Implications for Opportunistic FH Screening and Prognostication

Background: Familial hypercholesteremia (FH) leads to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although treatable, FH is underdiagnosed. Lipid lowering therapy may mask diagnostic pretreatment LDL-C levels. Participants of ASCVD trials may be enriched for FH, so ASCVD trial enrollment may be a unique contact point to opportunistically diagnose FH. Hypothesis: The population of the ACCELERATE trial of evacetrapib and ASCVD outcomes is enriched for FH. Methods: ACCELERATE is a phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes trial which randomized 12,092 patients with high-risk vascular disease to receive evacetrapib or placebo. FH was not reported. Using participant-level data, we estimated pretreatment LDL-c using validated corrections based on type and dose of statin therapy. We defined severe hypercholesterolemia as pretreatment LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dl and FH as severe hypercholesterolemia with total cholesterol > 290 mg/dL in a first or second degree relative, consistent with Simon Broome register criteria. We compared trial prevalence to general prevalence (severe hypercholesterolemia ~7%, FH ~0.4%). We evaluated the adjusted association of severe hypercholesterolemia with the primary trial endpoint of ASCVD events using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Data were available for 11,993 participants (99%). The prevalence of severe hypercholesteremia was 15% (1809/11993). The prevalence of FH was 2.1% (255/11993). Pretreatment LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL, as compared with pretreatment LDL-C < 190 mg/dL, was significantly associated with a higher incidence of the primary ASCVD trial endpoint (15% vs 13.5% respectively, adjusted hazard ratio 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.38, P=0.021; Figure ). Conclusion: In a participant-level analysis of a rigorous, independently adjudicated ASCVD outcomes trial, severe hypercholesterolemia and FH were more prevalent in the trial population than the general population based on pretreatment LDL-C calculation. Severe hypercholesterolemia was significantly associated with higher ASCVD incidence. ASCVD trial enrollment may be a novel high-yield contact point for index FH case identification using simple pretreatment LDL-C calculation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139026
Primary Topic
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139026: Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesteremia (FH) Among Participants in the ACCELERATE Trial: Implications for Opportunistic FH Screening and Prognostication

Fátima Rodríguez, Leslie Cho, Ashish Sarraju, Dennis Bruemmer et al.
Circulation
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
article

Abstract 4139026: Prevalence of Familial Hypercholesteremia (FH) Among Participants in the ACCELERATE Trial: Implications for Opportunistic FH Screening and Prognostication

Fátima Rodríguez, Leslie Cho, Ashish Sarraju, Dennis Bruemmer, Luke J. Laffin, Julie St. John, Abhayjit Singh, Josh Knowles
article en

Abstract

Background: Familial hypercholesteremia (FH) leads to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Although treatable, FH is underdiagnosed. Lipid lowering therapy may mask diagnostic pretreatment LDL-C levels. Participants of ASCVD trials may be enriched for FH, so ASCVD trial enrollment may be a unique contact point to opportunistically diagnose FH. Hypothesis: The population of the ACCELERATE trial of evacetrapib and ASCVD outcomes is enriched for FH. Methods: ACCELERATE is a phase 3 cardiovascular outcomes trial which randomized 12,092 patients with high-risk vascular disease to receive evacetrapib or placebo. FH was not reported. Using participant-level data, we estimated pretreatment LDL-c using validated corrections based on type and dose of statin therapy. We defined severe hypercholesterolemia as pretreatment LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dl and FH as severe hypercholesterolemia with total cholesterol > 290 mg/dL in a first or second degree relative, consistent with Simon Broome register criteria. We compared trial prevalence to general prevalence (severe hypercholesterolemia ~7%, FH ~0.4%). We evaluated the adjusted association of severe hypercholesterolemia with the primary trial endpoint of ASCVD events using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Results: Data were available for 11,993 participants (99%). The prevalence of severe hypercholesteremia was 15% (1809/11993). The prevalence of FH was 2.1% (255/11993). Pretreatment LDL-C ≥ 190 mg/dL, as compared with pretreatment LDL-C < 190 mg/dL, was significantly associated with a higher incidence of the primary ASCVD trial endpoint (15% vs 13.5% respectively, adjusted hazard ratio 1.19; 95% CI 1.03-1.38, P=0.021; Figure ). Conclusion: In a participant-level analysis of a rigorous, independently adjudicated ASCVD outcomes trial, severe hypercholesterolemia and FH were more prevalent in the trial population than the general population based on pretreatment LDL-C calculation. Severe hypercholesterolemia was significantly associated with higher ASCVD incidence. ASCVD trial enrollment may be a novel high-yield contact point for index FH case identification using simple pretreatment LDL-C calculation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cleveland Clinic (US), Palo Alto University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.