Abstract 4139235: Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Competing Risks Analysis

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is elevated in solid organ transplant recipients. However, data on CRC risk in heart transplant (HT) patients are limited. Also, screening recommendations for CRC in the HT population, especially patients under age 45, are lacking. Previous studies have been constrained by single-center designs, outdated cohorts, and lack of competing mortality analysis. Objectives: We aimed to assess competing-risk incidence of post-HT CRC, with focus on the effect of age, to inform CRC screening recommendations. Methods: We identified patients ≥18 years old at the time of HT in the TriNetX Research Network, which encompasses healthcare records from over 80 systems in the US, using CPT codes for HT (33945) and combined lung-HT (33935). CRC was identified from ICD-10 CM codes (C18, C19&C20). Because mortality is significantly higher than CRC risk in this population, we used the Fine and Gray competing-risks framework to estimate CRC incidence for the entire cohort and subgroups of interest. Results: We identified 4791 patients with HT or lung-HT between 1996 and 2024. After excluding 275 patients because of missing (N=266) or too short (N=9) follow-up, 4516 patients were included ( Table 1 ). After a median follow up of 3.6 years (25 th – 75 th percentile, 1.4 – 6.7), 48 patients developed CRC. The median time from HT to CRC was 4.5 years (0.7 – 8.0) and the median age at CRC was 65 (55 – 71). The cumulative incidence, adjusting for competing mortality, was 0.68% (95%CI: 0.45%, 1.0%) at 5 years and 1.7% (95%CI: 1.2%, 2.4%) at 10 years ( Figure 1 ), corresponding to an incidence rate of 170 cases per 100,000 patient-years, and did not differ between men and women (180 vs. 120; P=0.7). In comparison, all-cause mortality was 20% at 5 years and 38% at 10 years. Age at HT was not significantly associated with CRC risk (P=0.22); patients age <45 at HT experienced similar risk as patients ≥45 ( Table 2 ). In comparison, the age-adjusted CRC rate in the US population for years 2016-2020 was 42 and 32 cases per 100,000 patient-years in men and women, respectively. Year of HT was not associated with CRC risk (P=0.69). Conclusion: In this cohort of HT recipients, the absolute CRC risk was lower compared to previous reports that did not account for the competing risk of death. However, rates of CRC were much higher compared to the general population and did not differ by age at HT, suggesting that all HT patients should be screened for CRC regardless of age.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139235
Primary Topic
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139235: Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Competing Risks Analysis

Amin Tajerian, Michael Clores, Alan Abboud, Sharon Charles et al.
Circulation
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
article

Abstract 4139235: Colorectal Cancer Incidence in Heart Transplant Recipients: A Competing Risks Analysis

Amin Tajerian, Michael Clores, Alan Abboud, Sharon Charles, Olga C. Aroniadis, Marc Goldschmidt, Andreas S. Kalogeropoulos
article en

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk is elevated in solid organ transplant recipients. However, data on CRC risk in heart transplant (HT) patients are limited. Also, screening recommendations for CRC in the HT population, especially patients under age 45, are lacking. Previous studies have been constrained by single-center designs, outdated cohorts, and lack of competing mortality analysis. Objectives: We aimed to assess competing-risk incidence of post-HT CRC, with focus on the effect of age, to inform CRC screening recommendations. Methods: We identified patients ≥18 years old at the time of HT in the TriNetX Research Network, which encompasses healthcare records from over 80 systems in the US, using CPT codes for HT (33945) and combined lung-HT (33935). CRC was identified from ICD-10 CM codes (C18, C19&C20). Because mortality is significantly higher than CRC risk in this population, we used the Fine and Gray competing-risks framework to estimate CRC incidence for the entire cohort and subgroups of interest. Results: We identified 4791 patients with HT or lung-HT between 1996 and 2024. After excluding 275 patients because of missing (N=266) or too short (N=9) follow-up, 4516 patients were included ( Table 1 ). After a median follow up of 3.6 years (25 th – 75 th percentile, 1.4 – 6.7), 48 patients developed CRC. The median time from HT to CRC was 4.5 years (0.7 – 8.0) and the median age at CRC was 65 (55 – 71). The cumulative incidence, adjusting for competing mortality, was 0.68% (95%CI: 0.45%, 1.0%) at 5 years and 1.7% (95%CI: 1.2%, 2.4%) at 10 years ( Figure 1 ), corresponding to an incidence rate of 170 cases per 100,000 patient-years, and did not differ between men and women (180 vs. 120; P=0.7). In comparison, all-cause mortality was 20% at 5 years and 38% at 10 years. Age at HT was not significantly associated with CRC risk (P=0.22); patients age <45 at HT experienced similar risk as patients ≥45 ( Table 2 ). In comparison, the age-adjusted CRC rate in the US population for years 2016-2020 was 42 and 32 cases per 100,000 patient-years in men and women, respectively. Year of HT was not associated with CRC risk (P=0.69). Conclusion: In this cohort of HT recipients, the absolute CRC risk was lower compared to previous reports that did not account for the competing risk of death. However, rates of CRC were much higher compared to the general population and did not differ by age at HT, suggesting that all HT patients should be screened for CRC regardless of age.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Arak University of Medical Sciences (IR), Stony Brook University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.