Abstract 4139643: Variability of Ventricular Repolarization: Lessons Learned from Comparing Animal Xenotransplantations and First Human Genetically Modified Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Background: The worldwide first genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplant (xeno) in 2022 showed a markedly prolonged ventricular repolarization during the 60-day survival raising concerns for ventricular arrhythmias. Longitudinal QTc intervals in 16 porcine-to-baboon cardiac xenos performed at the University of Maryland from 2017-2022 were compared to the human measurements. Aim: Compare the variability in repolarization between human and simian recipients of genetically modified porcine xenos. Methods: Daily 12-lead ECGs of the human recipient were compared with long-term recordings of implanted monitors in the baboons. Results: The first human xenotransplant patient showed longer repolarization compared to the cohort of 16 baboons with porcine xenos (QTc 570±58ms [range 438-698ms] vs QTc 432±89ms [range 288-627ms]; p<0.01). When dividing 16 baboons into 4 groups from shortest to longest mean QTc intervals (361±34ms vs 399±37ms vs 481±36ms vs 542±38ms; p<0.01 for shortest vs longest QTc quartile), no group approached the mean QTc of the human (p<0.01). However, when compared to the baboon with the longest QTc and similar survival (69 vs 60 days), the QTc intervals were closer approximated (547±37ms [range 474-627ms]; p=0.03) and did not significantly differ after the initial 20 post-operative days (human 551±52ms vs baboon 559±33ms, p=0.38). Conclusion: While the first human xeno showed prolonged repolarization, the baboon cohort demonstrated significant variability of repolarization duration. QTc prolongation of similar magnitude was observed in the baboon with longest repolarization with comparable follow up. Therefore, the prolonged QTc in the single human xeno may either represent the different physiological response in human environment or an outlier similar to the baboon with the longest QTc. A larger human cohort will help answer this question and further assess the potential arrhythmic risk of xenotransplantation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139643
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139643: Variability of Ventricular Repolarization: Lessons Learned from Comparing Animal Xenotransplantations and First Human Genetically Modified Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Manjula Ananthram, Andrew Tully, Richard Amara, Timm Dickfeld et al.
Circulation
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
article

Abstract 4139643: Variability of Ventricular Repolarization: Lessons Learned from Comparing Animal Xenotransplantations and First Human Genetically Modified Cardiac Xenotransplantation

Manjula Ananthram, Andrew Tully, Richard Amara, Timm Dickfeld, Alison Grazioli, Muhammad Mohiuddin, Justin Brilliant, Bartley P. Griffith, Avneesh K. Singh, Oneib Khan, Susie Hong-Zohlman, Mahdokht Parsirad, Ubaid Khan, Stephen R. Shorofsky, Erika Feller
article en

Abstract

Background: The worldwide first genetically modified porcine-to-human cardiac xenotransplant (xeno) in 2022 showed a markedly prolonged ventricular repolarization during the 60-day survival raising concerns for ventricular arrhythmias. Longitudinal QTc intervals in 16 porcine-to-baboon cardiac xenos performed at the University of Maryland from 2017-2022 were compared to the human measurements. Aim: Compare the variability in repolarization between human and simian recipients of genetically modified porcine xenos. Methods: Daily 12-lead ECGs of the human recipient were compared with long-term recordings of implanted monitors in the baboons. Results: The first human xenotransplant patient showed longer repolarization compared to the cohort of 16 baboons with porcine xenos (QTc 570±58ms [range 438-698ms] vs QTc 432±89ms [range 288-627ms]; p<0.01). When dividing 16 baboons into 4 groups from shortest to longest mean QTc intervals (361±34ms vs 399±37ms vs 481±36ms vs 542±38ms; p<0.01 for shortest vs longest QTc quartile), no group approached the mean QTc of the human (p<0.01). However, when compared to the baboon with the longest QTc and similar survival (69 vs 60 days), the QTc intervals were closer approximated (547±37ms [range 474-627ms]; p=0.03) and did not significantly differ after the initial 20 post-operative days (human 551±52ms vs baboon 559±33ms, p=0.38). Conclusion: While the first human xeno showed prolonged repolarization, the baboon cohort demonstrated significant variability of repolarization duration. QTc prolongation of similar magnitude was observed in the baboon with longest repolarization with comparable follow up. Therefore, the prolonged QTc in the single human xeno may either represent the different physiological response in human environment or an outlier similar to the baboon with the longest QTc. A larger human cohort will help answer this question and further assess the potential arrhythmic risk of xenotransplantation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), University of Maryland Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.