Abstract 4139651: Cardiac Rehabilitation Following Thoracic Aortic Dissection Surgery: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study
Background: Despite expert opinion recommending patient-tailored cardiac rehabilitation (CR) after acute aortic dissection, both patient participation in CR and the associated risk factor modification after CR following aortic dissection repair are poorly understood. Objectives: To describe the characteristics of patients referred to CR, as well as the enrollment rate and outcomes of those referred to CR following thoracic aortic dissection. Methods: We reviewed electronic health records of adults (≥18) discharged alive following thoracic aortic dissection surgery across the Mayo Clinic Enterprise (01/01/2020-11/15/2022) with follow-up to 05/15/2024 (IRB #24-001141). Data are presented using summary statistics. Results: During the study period, 85 patients were included (median [IQR] age: 65 [50-75] years; 40% female; Table 1 ). Across 84% (N=71) who were referred to CR at discharge, 55% (N=39) enrolled. In those patients referred versus not referred to CR, the prevalence of type A dissection (75% vs. 43%), end-organ involvement (27% vs. 0%), and underlying CAD (54% vs. 21%) were greater while current tobacco use (9% vs. 29%) was lower. Of those enrolled at Mayo Clinic (N=16), CR was started 35 (28-65) days following surgery. These patients completed 21 (13-30) CR sessions at an exercise intensity of 59% (50-65%) maximum predicted heart rate. CR was discontinued in 44% (N=7) due to non-cardiac reasons ( Table 2 ). Of the 9 patients who completed CR, general health status (Dartmouth index: 19 [17-21] vs. 26 [22-34]), depressive symptoms (PHQ-9: 1 [0-1] vs. 4 [1-4]), and exercise capacity (6MWT: 214 [196-244] vs. 384 [305-597] meters) improved ( Table 2 ). There were no reported complications or deaths, with stable aortic sizes reported at 18 months. Conclusions: CR improves functional capacity and well-being without complications in patients after thoracic aortic dissection surgery. Further investigation is needed to better assess CR efficacy and usage in this population.
Authors
- Elizabeth H. Dineen (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4704-4495)
- Kevin Tayon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7770-8048)
- Keshav Poudel (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1294-7050)
- Brian P. Shapiro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1421-6940)
- Kiyan Heybati (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-2249)
- Kevin Landolfo
- Domenic Ochal
- Eric Zuberi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9754-4149)
- Sam Farres
- Bryan J. Taylor (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5229-941X)
Institutions
- Jacksonville College (US)
- WinnMed (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139651
- Primary Topic
- Hip and Femur Fractures
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00