Abstract 4139762: Structural and Functional Changes in the Left Atrium Following Arteriovenous Fistula Placement

Background: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains the preferred method of vascular access in patients requiring long-term maintenance hemodialysis for end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the AVF creates an acute left-to-right shunt, with the potential to cause high output heart failure. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: In patients with ESRD and AVF placement: 1) What is the effect of AVF on left atrial (LA) anatomy and function in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF)? 2) What are the longitudinal effects of AVF placement on prevalence of AF? Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 179 consecutive ESRD patients who underwent AVF placement from 2008-2022 at a single tertiary academic center. Trans-thoracic or trans-esophageal echocardiograms were compared for each patient pre- and post-AVF placement. The median interval between echocardiograms was 2.3 years. Results: AF was noted in 19.0% of patients prior to AVF placement. An additional 11.2% of the overall cohort developed AF during the study period (59% interval increase). Patients with AF were older (p=0.002), had greater body surface area (p=0.037), and were more likely to have a history of diabetes (p=0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities. AVF placement was associated with a significant increase in LA maximum volume in the overall cohort (70.0+/-32.2 mL post-AVF from 52.1+/-21.0 mL pre-AVF, p<0.001). In patients with AF, LA maximum volume was significantly larger post-AVF compared to those without AF (79.7+/-28.7 vs 60.8+/-26.8 mL, p=0.004). LA strain was significantly lower in patients with AF pre-AVF (42.8+/-11.7% vs 52.5+/-13.6%, p<0.001) and post-AVF (39.9+/-13.1% vs 49.9+/-14.4%, p<0.001). Incidence of newly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction post-AVF was 13% in patients with AF (7/54) compared to 6.4% (8/125, p=0.146) in those without. Conclusion: Patients who undergo AVF placement for ESRD are at significant risk for subsequent development of AF, with adverse hemodynamic consequences. Close monitoring of cardiac rhythm, anatomy, and function is warranted in the post-AVF cohort. Additional studies to examine optimal management of this vulnerable population are needed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139762
Primary Topic
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139762: Structural and Functional Changes in the Left Atrium Following Arteriovenous Fistula Placement

J Leso, Mikhail Torosoff, Krishnakumar D. Hongalgi, Z. Daniel et al.
Circulation
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
article

Abstract 4139762: Structural and Functional Changes in the Left Atrium Following Arteriovenous Fistula Placement

J Leso, Mikhail Torosoff, Krishnakumar D. Hongalgi, Z. Daniel, John Musumeci
article en

Abstract

Background: Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) remains the preferred method of vascular access in patients requiring long-term maintenance hemodialysis for end stage renal disease (ESRD). However, the AVF creates an acute left-to-right shunt, with the potential to cause high output heart failure. RESEARCH QUESTIONS: In patients with ESRD and AVF placement: 1) What is the effect of AVF on left atrial (LA) anatomy and function in patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF)? 2) What are the longitudinal effects of AVF placement on prevalence of AF? Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 179 consecutive ESRD patients who underwent AVF placement from 2008-2022 at a single tertiary academic center. Trans-thoracic or trans-esophageal echocardiograms were compared for each patient pre- and post-AVF placement. The median interval between echocardiograms was 2.3 years. Results: AF was noted in 19.0% of patients prior to AVF placement. An additional 11.2% of the overall cohort developed AF during the study period (59% interval increase). Patients with AF were older (p=0.002), had greater body surface area (p=0.037), and were more likely to have a history of diabetes (p=0.01), but otherwise there were no significant differences in baseline comorbidities. AVF placement was associated with a significant increase in LA maximum volume in the overall cohort (70.0+/-32.2 mL post-AVF from 52.1+/-21.0 mL pre-AVF, p<0.001). In patients with AF, LA maximum volume was significantly larger post-AVF compared to those without AF (79.7+/-28.7 vs 60.8+/-26.8 mL, p=0.004). LA strain was significantly lower in patients with AF pre-AVF (42.8+/-11.7% vs 52.5+/-13.6%, p<0.001) and post-AVF (39.9+/-13.1% vs 49.9+/-14.4%, p<0.001). Incidence of newly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction post-AVF was 13% in patients with AF (7/54) compared to 6.4% (8/125, p=0.146) in those without. Conclusion: Patients who undergo AVF placement for ESRD are at significant risk for subsequent development of AF, with adverse hemodynamic consequences. Close monitoring of cardiac rhythm, anatomy, and function is warranted in the post-AVF cohort. Additional studies to examine optimal management of this vulnerable population are needed.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Missouri (US), Albany Medical Center Hospital (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Central Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.