Abstract 4139585: Differences in Health Care Utilization Prior to Cardiac Arrest Among Patients with Shockable versus Non-Shockable Rhythms

Background: Health care utilization has been shown to be high prior to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, differences in patterns of health care utilization between OHCA presenting with shockable and non-shockable rhythms have not been explored. Hypothesis: Health care interactions prior to cardiac arrest are more common among those presenting with non-shockable rhythms, a large proportion of which may be a manifestation of chronic disease progression. Aim: To examine health care utilization prior to OHCA and the differences between patients presenting with shockable and non-shockable rhythms, in comparison to population controls. Methods: This was a matched case-control study. Cardiac arrests from 2009-2019 were identified in the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry. Age, sex and geographic population controls were identified. We examined health care utilization in the 3 years prior to cardiac arrest. Results: A total of 3,461 shockable and 11,470 non-shockable OHCA patients were identified and matched 4:1 to 45,871 controls. The rate of hospitalization in the 3 years prior was 57% in the shockable group (39.5% in controls, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.53-1.79) and 61.5% in the non-shockable group (39.5% in controls, OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.55-2.79). Overall hospitalizations were more common in both OHCA compared to controls, while non-cardiovascular (CV) admissions were greater for the non-shockable versus shockable groups ( Figure ). When examining bi-weekly rates of hospital and ER visits leading up to OHCA, both groups had increased CV encounters arising at 10 weeks prior to arrest, whereas the non-shockable group had greater non-CV encounters as compared to the shockable group. Conclusion: Shockable and non-shockable OHCA show high rates of health care utilization leading up to cardiac arrest, which may provide opportunities for intervention. Differences between the shockable and non-shockable groups may reflect underlying pathophysiology, which has implications for prevention of OHCA.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139585
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139585: Differences in Health Care Utilization Prior to Cardiac Arrest Among Patients with Shockable versus Non-Shockable Rhythms

Marc W. Deyell, Elizabeth Burden, Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Jennie Helmer et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Abstract 4139585: Differences in Health Care Utilization Prior to Cardiac Arrest Among Patients with Shockable versus Non-Shockable Rhythms

Marc W. Deyell, Elizabeth Burden, Nathaniel M. Hawkins, Jennie Helmer, Christopher B. Fordyce, Brian Grunau, Meijiao Guan
article en

Abstract

Background: Health care utilization has been shown to be high prior to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, differences in patterns of health care utilization between OHCA presenting with shockable and non-shockable rhythms have not been explored. Hypothesis: Health care interactions prior to cardiac arrest are more common among those presenting with non-shockable rhythms, a large proportion of which may be a manifestation of chronic disease progression. Aim: To examine health care utilization prior to OHCA and the differences between patients presenting with shockable and non-shockable rhythms, in comparison to population controls. Methods: This was a matched case-control study. Cardiac arrests from 2009-2019 were identified in the British Columbia Cardiac Arrest Registry. Age, sex and geographic population controls were identified. We examined health care utilization in the 3 years prior to cardiac arrest. Results: A total of 3,461 shockable and 11,470 non-shockable OHCA patients were identified and matched 4:1 to 45,871 controls. The rate of hospitalization in the 3 years prior was 57% in the shockable group (39.5% in controls, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.53-1.79) and 61.5% in the non-shockable group (39.5% in controls, OR 2.67, 95% CI 2.55-2.79). Overall hospitalizations were more common in both OHCA compared to controls, while non-cardiovascular (CV) admissions were greater for the non-shockable versus shockable groups ( Figure ). When examining bi-weekly rates of hospital and ER visits leading up to OHCA, both groups had increased CV encounters arising at 10 weeks prior to arrest, whereas the non-shockable group had greater non-CV encounters as compared to the shockable group. Conclusion: Shockable and non-shockable OHCA show high rates of health care utilization leading up to cardiac arrest, which may provide opportunities for intervention. Differences between the shockable and non-shockable groups may reflect underlying pathophysiology, which has implications for prevention of OHCA.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Island Health (CA), University of British Columbia (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.