Abstract 4139067: Racial and Ethnic Variations in the Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases 10 <sup>th</sup> Revision (ICD-10) Codes for Identifying Pulmonary Embolism

Background: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis codes are commonly used to identify patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) for research, surveillance, or quality improvement. Ethno-racial disparities exist in the presentation, treatment strategies, and outcomes of PE, but it is unknown whether disparities extend to how PE is coded in electronic health records. Methods: The PE-EHR+ study was designed to validate ICD-10 codes for PE. We used data from Mass General Brigham (MGB). The reference standard was the manual chart review by two independent investigators using predefined criteria. Sensitivity and specificity for ICD-10 codes were determined by race and ethnicity. Results: 1,712 randomly sampled patients in equal distribution with PE principal discharge codes, PE secondary discharge codes, and no discharge codes for PE were selected from MGB. The race and ethnicity of the patients were non-Hispanic White (n=1,368), non-Hispanic Black (n=160), non-Hispanic Asian (n=50), non-Hispanic other or unknown (n=84), and Hispanic or Latino (n=50). The sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 discharge diagnosis codes for PE were similar across race and ethnicity (Table). The results for the principal discharge diagnosis codes showed low sensitivity (range: 45%-66.3%) but high specificity (range: 90.9%-96.7%) by race and ethnicity. The principal or secondary discharge diagnosis codes resulted in high sensitivity (range: 99.7%-100%) but low specificity (range: 66.2%-83.3%) by race and ethnicity. The hybrid approach encompassing principal codes or secondary codes plus diagnostic imaging codes displayed high sensitivity (range: 97%-100%) and moderately high specificity (range: 78.1%-90%) among different racial and ethnic groups. Conclusion: While the study shows the tradeoffs of various combinations of ICD-10 codes for identifying PE, reassuringly, there was no large variation by race and ethnicity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139067
Primary Topic
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139067: Racial and Ethnic Variations in the Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases 10 th Revision (ICD-10) Codes for Identifying Pulmonary Embolism

Mohamad A. Hussain, Mehrdad Zarghami, Antoine Bejjani, Sina Rashedi et al.
Circulation
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
article

Abstract 4139067: Racial and Ethnic Variations in the Accuracy of International Classification of Diseases 10 th Revision (ICD-10) Codes for Identifying Pulmonary Embolism

Mohamad A. Hussain, Mehrdad Zarghami, Antoine Bejjani, Sina Rashedi, Li Zhou, Samuel Zachary Goldhaber, Sanjay Aneja, Alfonso Muriel, Behnood Bikdeli, Andetta R. Hunsaker, Hamid Mojibian, J.V. Jimenez Ceja, Ayaz Aghayev, Eric A. Secemsky, Frederikus Albertus Klok, Ying-Chih Lo, César Caraballo, Abena Appah-Sampong, Candrika D. Khairani, Darsiya Krishnathasan, Shiwani Mahajan, Harlan M. Krumholz, Bassil Bacare, Liqin Wang, Gregory Piazza, David Jiménez, Manuel Monreal
article en

Abstract

Background: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) discharge diagnosis codes are commonly used to identify patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) for research, surveillance, or quality improvement. Ethno-racial disparities exist in the presentation, treatment strategies, and outcomes of PE, but it is unknown whether disparities extend to how PE is coded in electronic health records. Methods: The PE-EHR+ study was designed to validate ICD-10 codes for PE. We used data from Mass General Brigham (MGB). The reference standard was the manual chart review by two independent investigators using predefined criteria. Sensitivity and specificity for ICD-10 codes were determined by race and ethnicity. Results: 1,712 randomly sampled patients in equal distribution with PE principal discharge codes, PE secondary discharge codes, and no discharge codes for PE were selected from MGB. The race and ethnicity of the patients were non-Hispanic White (n=1,368), non-Hispanic Black (n=160), non-Hispanic Asian (n=50), non-Hispanic other or unknown (n=84), and Hispanic or Latino (n=50). The sensitivity and specificity of ICD-10 discharge diagnosis codes for PE were similar across race and ethnicity (Table). The results for the principal discharge diagnosis codes showed low sensitivity (range: 45%-66.3%) but high specificity (range: 90.9%-96.7%) by race and ethnicity. The principal or secondary discharge diagnosis codes resulted in high sensitivity (range: 99.7%-100%) but low specificity (range: 66.2%-83.3%) by race and ethnicity. The hybrid approach encompassing principal codes or secondary codes plus diagnostic imaging codes displayed high sensitivity (range: 97%-100%) and moderately high specificity (range: 78.1%-90%) among different racial and ethnic groups. Conclusion: While the study shows the tradeoffs of various combinations of ICD-10 codes for identifying PE, reassuringly, there was no large variation by race and ethnicity.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Leiden University (NL), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Universidad de Alcalá (ES), Beth Israel Deaconess Hospital (US), Yale University (US), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias (ES), Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (ES), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (ES), Universidad Católica de Murcia (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.