Abstract 4139575: Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in amyloid light chain cardiac amyloidosis

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been persuasively adopted in clinical practice to achieve electrical and mechanical synchrony of the left ventricle. However, LBBAP in amyloid light chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) patients has not been studied in detail. Hypothesis: LBBAP could be a feasible and safe approach to rectify the conduction system diseases of AL-CA patients. Aim: To study the feasibility and safety of LBBAP in AL-CA patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with AL-CA and newly implanted pacemaker in our centre between 1st January 2022 and 31st December 2023 were retrospectively included. The diagnosis of AL-CA was confirmed according to the current ESC position statement. Indications for pacemaker fulfilled the current ESC guideline. All patients underwent attempts of LBBAP or right ventricular pacing (RVP) based on operators’ preference. Results: A total of 10 patients were included. RVP was chosen initially in 1 patient and LBBAP was attempted in 9 patients. LBBAP were successfully performed in 6 patients (66.7%, 6/9). Three patients crossed over to RVP group because LBBAP was failed to achieve (Fig.1) . Baseline clinical characteristics and pacing parameters was compared between LBBAP group and RVP group ( Table.1 ). Duration of intrinsic QRS was similar and paced QRS was wider in RVP group ( P =0.029). During follow-up, one patient in LBBAP group died from sudden death 15 days after implantation, while 2 patients in RVP group died from sudden death and pneumonia 55 days and 17 days after implantation, respectively. Seven patients visited our centre at three-month follow-up without adverse events and interrogation reports were summarized in Fig.1 . Conclusion: LBBAP appears to be a reasonable method for physiological pacing for patients with AL-CA and bradycardia, but its impact on long-term prognosis needs further investigation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139575
Primary Topic
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139575: Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in amyloid light chain cardiac amyloidosis

Jiaqi Yu, Deyan Yang, Zhongwei Cheng, Peng Gao et al.
Circulation
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
article

Abstract 4139575: Feasibility and safety of left bundle branch area pacing in amyloid light chain cardiac amyloidosis

Jiaqi Yu, Deyan Yang, Zhongwei Cheng, Peng Gao, Yongtai Liu, Taibo Chen, Xiaohan Qin, Quan Fang, Jiaqi Wang, Jian Li, Lihua Zhang, Jingbo Fan, Hua Deng, Kangan Cheng, Jinzhi Lai
article en

Abstract

Background: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been persuasively adopted in clinical practice to achieve electrical and mechanical synchrony of the left ventricle. However, LBBAP in amyloid light chain cardiac amyloidosis (AL-CA) patients has not been studied in detail. Hypothesis: LBBAP could be a feasible and safe approach to rectify the conduction system diseases of AL-CA patients. Aim: To study the feasibility and safety of LBBAP in AL-CA patients. Methods: Consecutive patients with AL-CA and newly implanted pacemaker in our centre between 1st January 2022 and 31st December 2023 were retrospectively included. The diagnosis of AL-CA was confirmed according to the current ESC position statement. Indications for pacemaker fulfilled the current ESC guideline. All patients underwent attempts of LBBAP or right ventricular pacing (RVP) based on operators’ preference. Results: A total of 10 patients were included. RVP was chosen initially in 1 patient and LBBAP was attempted in 9 patients. LBBAP were successfully performed in 6 patients (66.7%, 6/9). Three patients crossed over to RVP group because LBBAP was failed to achieve (Fig.1) . Baseline clinical characteristics and pacing parameters was compared between LBBAP group and RVP group ( Table.1 ). Duration of intrinsic QRS was similar and paced QRS was wider in RVP group ( P =0.029). During follow-up, one patient in LBBAP group died from sudden death 15 days after implantation, while 2 patients in RVP group died from sudden death and pneumonia 55 days and 17 days after implantation, respectively. Seven patients visited our centre at three-month follow-up without adverse events and interrogation reports were summarized in Fig.1 . Conclusion: LBBAP appears to be a reasonable method for physiological pacing for patients with AL-CA and bradycardia, but its impact on long-term prognosis needs further investigation.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking Union Medical College Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Amyloidosis: Diagnosis, Treatment, Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.