Abstract 4139313: Prognostic Implication Of Fibrosis-4 Index for Risk Of Mortality In Chronic Heart Failure Patients With And Without Type 2 Diabetes.

Background and aim: The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score is recommended as a first-line screening tool to rule-out advanced liver fibrosis. It is highly recommended to screen for liver fibrosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and elevated liver enzymes using the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score.However, this recommendation does not extend to patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who do not have T2DM. We aimed to investigate the predictors of high risk for advanced liver fibrosis according to the FIB-4 score and its association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major adverse liver outcomes (MALO), in patients with CHF, both with and without T2DM. Methods: This was a nationwide registry-based cohort study. We included patients registered in the Danish Heart Failure Registry who had laboratory data available to calculate FIB-4 scores from April 2003 to December 2019. Patients were classified as low-risk (Fib-4 <1.3), indeterminate-risk (1.3 – 2.67), and high-risk of advanced liver fibrosis (≥2.67). The analysis was conducted using multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 6079 patients with CHF were included in the study. High-risk of advanced liver fibrosis was highly prevalent, affecting 30% of the studied population. Predictors of high-risk of advanced liver fibrosis, included older age, male sex, severe chronic kidney disease, previous myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and atrial fibrillation/flutter. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17-1.45), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.49-2.17), as well as MALO (HR: 4.42, 95% CI: 2.70-7.23) when compared to those in the low-risk group. This was regardless of the presence of T2DM. Additionally, patients in the indeterminate-risk group showed an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46) and MALO (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.13-3.06) when compared to the low-risk group. Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort study, we found a high prevalence of high-risk of advanced liver fibrosis according to the FIB-4 score. Several clinical predictors of high-risk of liver fibrosis was identified. High-risk patients exhibited significantly higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major adverse liver outcomes (MALO), compared to low-risk patients, independent of T2DM status.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139313
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139313: Prognostic Implication Of Fibrosis-4 Index for Risk Of Mortality In Chronic Heart Failure Patients With And Without Type 2 Diabetes.

Gunnar Gislason, Daniel Mølager Christensen, Abdullahi Ahmed Mohamed, Morten Schou
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4139313: Prognostic Implication Of Fibrosis-4 Index for Risk Of Mortality In Chronic Heart Failure Patients With And Without Type 2 Diabetes.

Gunnar Gislason, Daniel Mølager Christensen, Abdullahi Ahmed Mohamed, Morten Schou
article en

Abstract

Background and aim: The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score is recommended as a first-line screening tool to rule-out advanced liver fibrosis. It is highly recommended to screen for liver fibrosis in patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and elevated liver enzymes using the fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score.However, this recommendation does not extend to patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) who do not have T2DM. We aimed to investigate the predictors of high risk for advanced liver fibrosis according to the FIB-4 score and its association with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major adverse liver outcomes (MALO), in patients with CHF, both with and without T2DM. Methods: This was a nationwide registry-based cohort study. We included patients registered in the Danish Heart Failure Registry who had laboratory data available to calculate FIB-4 scores from April 2003 to December 2019. Patients were classified as low-risk (Fib-4 <1.3), indeterminate-risk (1.3 – 2.67), and high-risk of advanced liver fibrosis (≥2.67). The analysis was conducted using multiple logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 6079 patients with CHF were included in the study. High-risk of advanced liver fibrosis was highly prevalent, affecting 30% of the studied population. Predictors of high-risk of advanced liver fibrosis, included older age, male sex, severe chronic kidney disease, previous myocardial infarction, ischemic heart disease, and atrial fibrillation/flutter. Patients in the high-risk group exhibited a significantly elevated risk of all-cause mortality (HR: 1.30, 95% CI: 1.17-1.45), cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.49-2.17), as well as MALO (HR: 4.42, 95% CI: 2.70-7.23) when compared to those in the low-risk group. This was regardless of the presence of T2DM. Additionally, patients in the indeterminate-risk group showed an increased risk of cardiovascular mortality (HR: 1.22, 95% CI: 1.02-1.46) and MALO (HR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.13-3.06) when compared to the low-risk group. Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort study, we found a high prevalence of high-risk of advanced liver fibrosis according to the FIB-4 score. Several clinical predictors of high-risk of liver fibrosis was identified. High-risk patients exhibited significantly higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as major adverse liver outcomes (MALO), compared to low-risk patients, independent of T2DM status.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Herlev Hospital (DK), Gentofte Hospital (DK)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.