Abstract 4139975: Field of View of Atrial Electrodes by Endocardial and Epicardial Computer Mapping

Background: Mapping atrial fibrillation (AF) electrograms at each position on a multipolar catheter is complicated by the impact of far-field signals from colliding and chaotic wavelets. The actual field of view of unipolar and bipolar electrodes of different sizes and separations is undefined, yet may substantially impact recorded AF maps. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the field of view (antenna) of EGMs can be defined based on the size of electrode, their spacing, and tissue characteristics including conduction velocity using biophysical models of active myocardial tissue. Methods: We modeled conduction in atrial tissue of size 30 x 30 x 3 mm, to estimate the region around clinical Advisor TM HDGrid (Abbott), Octaray TM or Optrell TM (Biosense-Webster) multipolar catheters. We tested various 1 mm electrode configurations, separated by 2 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm. Using models discretized into 100,000 and 100 nodes, we varied conduction velocities and propagation directions to simulate myocardial propagation (fig. A). The EGM was constructed using the electric potential transfer equation between the tissue and the electrode, discretized for each tissue node to evaluate individual contributions of atrial regions to unipolar and bipolar EGMs. We defined the spatial near field as regions contributing > 30% of signal amplitude. Results: Transverse recording antenna varied substantially with bipolar configuration. In Figure B, the unipolar electrode recorded near field activity within a 3D ellipsoid of radius 8 mm across-tissue and 2.7 mm transmurally with a 1.9 endo-to-epicardial amplitude ratio. Bipolar electrodes showed directional antennas for near field, aligned with the propagation direction (fig. C) with radii of 1.7, 5.7 and 8.3 mm for 2, 5, and 10 mm spacing, respectively (fig. C). Bipolar electrodes showed less transmural variability in near field antenna (range 2-2.7 mm), which was similar to unipolar (fig. D). Conclusions: Current generation multipolar catheters may record apparently “near field” signals in relatively large ellipsoids/spheres of radius 1.7 to ~8 mm. This may substantially impact signal fidelity when the same wave is not present throughout this volume, such as in AF or ventricular fibrillation, and may impact noise detection for atrial and ventricular tachycardia. Signal processing techniques are required to improve near field signal detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139975
Primary Topic
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139975: Field of View of Atrial Electrodes by Endocardial and Epicardial Computer Mapping

Sanjiv M. Narayan, Samuel Ruipérez-Campillo, Miguel Rodrigo
Circulation
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
article

Abstract 4139975: Field of View of Atrial Electrodes by Endocardial and Epicardial Computer Mapping

Sanjiv M. Narayan, Samuel Ruipérez-Campillo, Miguel Rodrigo
article en

Abstract

Background: Mapping atrial fibrillation (AF) electrograms at each position on a multipolar catheter is complicated by the impact of far-field signals from colliding and chaotic wavelets. The actual field of view of unipolar and bipolar electrodes of different sizes and separations is undefined, yet may substantially impact recorded AF maps. Hypothesis: We tested the hypothesis that the field of view (antenna) of EGMs can be defined based on the size of electrode, their spacing, and tissue characteristics including conduction velocity using biophysical models of active myocardial tissue. Methods: We modeled conduction in atrial tissue of size 30 x 30 x 3 mm, to estimate the region around clinical Advisor TM HDGrid (Abbott), Octaray TM or Optrell TM (Biosense-Webster) multipolar catheters. We tested various 1 mm electrode configurations, separated by 2 mm, 5 mm and 10 mm. Using models discretized into 100,000 and 100 nodes, we varied conduction velocities and propagation directions to simulate myocardial propagation (fig. A). The EGM was constructed using the electric potential transfer equation between the tissue and the electrode, discretized for each tissue node to evaluate individual contributions of atrial regions to unipolar and bipolar EGMs. We defined the spatial near field as regions contributing > 30% of signal amplitude. Results: Transverse recording antenna varied substantially with bipolar configuration. In Figure B, the unipolar electrode recorded near field activity within a 3D ellipsoid of radius 8 mm across-tissue and 2.7 mm transmurally with a 1.9 endo-to-epicardial amplitude ratio. Bipolar electrodes showed directional antennas for near field, aligned with the propagation direction (fig. C) with radii of 1.7, 5.7 and 8.3 mm for 2, 5, and 10 mm spacing, respectively (fig. C). Bipolar electrodes showed less transmural variability in near field antenna (range 2-2.7 mm), which was similar to unipolar (fig. D). Conclusions: Current generation multipolar catheters may record apparently “near field” signals in relatively large ellipsoids/spheres of radius 1.7 to ~8 mm. This may substantially impact signal fidelity when the same wave is not present throughout this volume, such as in AF or ventricular fibrillation, and may impact noise detection for atrial and ventricular tachycardia. Signal processing techniques are required to improve near field signal detection.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Universitat de València (ES), ETH Zurich (CH), Stanford Medicine (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
ECG Monitoring and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.