Abstract 4139347: Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular versus Surgical Revascularization in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults

Background: Recent clinical trials (BEST-CLI and BASIL-2) have produced divergent results comparing endovascular vs surgical therapy in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The difference may be related to varying levels of frailty among the patient included. Objective: To compare the risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) or death in endovascular vs surgical therapy in real-world older adults with and without frailty Methods: We applied target trial emulation framework. This retrospective study using the 2016-2022 Medicare data included patients aged ≥65 years with CLTI who underwent surgical or endovascular therapy without revascularization in the prior year. Frailty was defined as a claims-based frailty index ≥0.25. The primary outcome was a composite of MALE or death. After propensity score (PS) matching, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using the Cox proportional hazards model for the total population and by frailty levels. Results: Before PS matching, the endovascular group (n=37513) was older (78 vs 76 years), more likely to be women (43% vs 39%), dually eligible for Medicaid (35% vs 28%), frail (56% vs 40%), and more likely to have diabetes (79% vs 67%), chronic kidney disease (81% vs 68%) and prior stroke (32% vs 27%) compared to the surgical group (n=8754). After PS matching (n=8116 per group), surgical therapy was associated with a lower rate of the primary outcome in the total population (55 vs 77 per 100 person-years, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). The benefit of surgical therapy was consistent in frail patients (71 vs 95 per 100 person-years, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81) and non-frail patients (45 vs 67 per 100 person-years, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.73) (Figure). Mortality rates per 100 person-years for surgical and endovascular groups were 42 and 47, respectively, in frail patients and 17 and 22 in non-frail patients. Conclusion: The effect estimates from our real-world data study were consistent with the effect estimate from BEST-CLI trial, with no treatment effect heterogeneity by frailty levels. The rate of primary outcome was very high in the frail group with nearly half dying within one year after surgical or endovascular therapy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139347
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139347: Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular versus Surgical Revascularization in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults

Ashvin N. Pande, Naomi M. Hamburg, Dae Hyun Kim, Chan Mi Park et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4139347: Clinical Outcomes of Endovascular versus Surgical Revascularization in Frail and Non-Frail Older Adults

Ashvin N. Pande, Naomi M. Hamburg, Dae Hyun Kim, Chan Mi Park, Darae Ko, Peter Evans
article en

Abstract

Background: Recent clinical trials (BEST-CLI and BASIL-2) have produced divergent results comparing endovascular vs surgical therapy in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). The difference may be related to varying levels of frailty among the patient included. Objective: To compare the risk of major adverse limb events (MALE) or death in endovascular vs surgical therapy in real-world older adults with and without frailty Methods: We applied target trial emulation framework. This retrospective study using the 2016-2022 Medicare data included patients aged ≥65 years with CLTI who underwent surgical or endovascular therapy without revascularization in the prior year. Frailty was defined as a claims-based frailty index ≥0.25. The primary outcome was a composite of MALE or death. After propensity score (PS) matching, we estimated hazard ratios (HRs) using the Cox proportional hazards model for the total population and by frailty levels. Results: Before PS matching, the endovascular group (n=37513) was older (78 vs 76 years), more likely to be women (43% vs 39%), dually eligible for Medicaid (35% vs 28%), frail (56% vs 40%), and more likely to have diabetes (79% vs 67%), chronic kidney disease (81% vs 68%) and prior stroke (32% vs 27%) compared to the surgical group (n=8754). After PS matching (n=8116 per group), surgical therapy was associated with a lower rate of the primary outcome in the total population (55 vs 77 per 100 person-years, HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.70-0.77). The benefit of surgical therapy was consistent in frail patients (71 vs 95 per 100 person-years, HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.71-0.81) and non-frail patients (45 vs 67 per 100 person-years, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.64-0.73) (Figure). Mortality rates per 100 person-years for surgical and endovascular groups were 42 and 47, respectively, in frail patients and 17 and 22 in non-frail patients. Conclusion: The effect estimates from our real-world data study were consistent with the effect estimate from BEST-CLI trial, with no treatment effect heterogeneity by frailty levels. The rate of primary outcome was very high in the frail group with nearly half dying within one year after surgical or endovascular therapy.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Boston University (US), Boston Medical Center (US), University Medical Center (US), Hebrew SeniorLife (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.