Abstract 4139550: Americans’ Views on Healthcare Coverage, Access, and Equity in the US: Implications for Cardiovascular Health

Background: Increased healthcare coverage and access leads to better cardiovascular outcomes. Policymakers are currently assessing strategies to expand coverage and access through government programs, but Americans’ views on health care remain poorly characterized. Methods: We used the 2022 General Social Survey (GSS) to assess perceptions of US healthcare coverage, access, and equity. We examined responses to 3 questions for all respondents, and stratified by age, income, and political affiliation: (1) whether the rich have easier access to health care, (2) whether it is unfair that those with higher incomes can afford better health care, and (3) whether respondents would be willing to pay higher taxes to improve the level of health care for all. GSS survey weights were used to generate nationally representative estimates. Results: Our analyses included 3544 survey respondents (weighted mean [SD] age, 47.1 [17.9] years). The majority of US adults agreed that the rich have easier access to health care (79.5%, [95% CI 75.7%, 83.3%]). Overall, more than half of Americans believe that differential access based on income is unfair (56.5% [52.0%, 60.9%]), with significant variation based on political party affiliation (Democrats 70.8% [62.4%, 79.2%]) vs Republicans 34.0% [25.9%, 42.1%], p < 0.001). In terms of expanding coverage, 10.7% [8.1%, 13.3%] of Americans were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the level of health care for all, with stronger support among Democrats than Republicans (20.3% [14.4%, 26.2%] vs 2.6% [0.6%, 4.5%], p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant variation in responses based on respondent age and income. Conclusions: In this national study, we find that Americans’ views on healthcare coverage, access, and equity are divided along partisan lines. Despite broad agreement that access is inequitable, only 1 in 10 Americans are willing to pay higher taxes to increase health care coverage nationwide. These results may inform policy priorities around expanding care coverage – including preventative screening, guideline-directed therapies, and in-hospital care for cardiometabolic conditions – with the goal of improving cardiovascular health in the US.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139550
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139550: Americans’ Views on Healthcare Coverage, Access, and Equity in the US: Implications for Cardiovascular Health

Rishi K. Wadhera, Sudheesha Perera, Dhruv Khullar
Circulation
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Abstract 4139550: Americans’ Views on Healthcare Coverage, Access, and Equity in the US: Implications for Cardiovascular Health

Rishi K. Wadhera, Sudheesha Perera, Dhruv Khullar
article en

Abstract

Background: Increased healthcare coverage and access leads to better cardiovascular outcomes. Policymakers are currently assessing strategies to expand coverage and access through government programs, but Americans’ views on health care remain poorly characterized. Methods: We used the 2022 General Social Survey (GSS) to assess perceptions of US healthcare coverage, access, and equity. We examined responses to 3 questions for all respondents, and stratified by age, income, and political affiliation: (1) whether the rich have easier access to health care, (2) whether it is unfair that those with higher incomes can afford better health care, and (3) whether respondents would be willing to pay higher taxes to improve the level of health care for all. GSS survey weights were used to generate nationally representative estimates. Results: Our analyses included 3544 survey respondents (weighted mean [SD] age, 47.1 [17.9] years). The majority of US adults agreed that the rich have easier access to health care (79.5%, [95% CI 75.7%, 83.3%]). Overall, more than half of Americans believe that differential access based on income is unfair (56.5% [52.0%, 60.9%]), with significant variation based on political party affiliation (Democrats 70.8% [62.4%, 79.2%]) vs Republicans 34.0% [25.9%, 42.1%], p < 0.001). In terms of expanding coverage, 10.7% [8.1%, 13.3%] of Americans were willing to pay higher taxes to improve the level of health care for all, with stronger support among Democrats than Republicans (20.3% [14.4%, 26.2%] vs 2.6% [0.6%, 4.5%], p < 0.001). We found no statistically significant variation in responses based on respondent age and income. Conclusions: In this national study, we find that Americans’ views on healthcare coverage, access, and equity are divided along partisan lines. Despite broad agreement that access is inequitable, only 1 in 10 Americans are willing to pay higher taxes to increase health care coverage nationwide. These results may inform policy priorities around expanding care coverage – including preventative screening, guideline-directed therapies, and in-hospital care for cardiometabolic conditions – with the goal of improving cardiovascular health in the US.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cornell University (US), Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.