Abstract 4139675: Short- and long-term impact of aspirin cessation in older adults: a target trial emulation.

Background: The net benefit of aspirin cessation in older adults remains uncertain. This study aimed to use observational data to emulate a randomized trial of aspirin cessation versus continuation in older adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Post-hoc analysis using a target trial emulation framework ( Table 1 ) applied to the immediate post-trial period (2017-2021) of a study of low-dose aspirin initiation in 19,114 adults aged 70 years and older (ASPREE; NCT01038583). Participants from Australia and US were included if they were free of CVD at the start of the post-trial intervention period (time zero, T0) and had been taking open-label or randomized aspirin immediately before T0 ( Fig 1A ). The two groups in the target trial were: aspirin cessation (participants who were taking randomized aspirin immediately before T0; assumed to have stopped at T0 as instructed) versus aspirin continuation (participants on open-label aspirin at T0 regardless of their randomized treatment; assumed to have continued at T0). The outcomes after T0 were incident CVD, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding during 3, 6, and 12 months (short-term), and 48 months (long-term) follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing aspirin cessation to continuation were estimated from propensity-score (PS) adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Results: We included 6,103 CVD-free participants (cessation: 5,427, continuation: 676). Participant selection flow chart is presented in Fig 1B . Over both short- and long-term follow-up, aspirin cessation versus continuation was not associated with elevated risk of CVD, MACE and all-cause mortality (HRs, at 3 and 48 months respectively were, 1.23 and 0.73 for CVD; 1.11 and 0.84 for MACE; 0.23 and 0.79 for all-cause mortality, p >0.05) but cessation had a reduced risk of incident major bleeding events (HRs at 3 and 48 months, 0.16 and 0.63, p <0.05) ( Fig 1C ). Similar findings were seen for all outcomes at 6 and 12 months, except for a lowered risk of all-cause mortality in the cessation group at 12 months ( Fig 1C ). Conclusions: Our findings support the safety of deprescribing prophylactic aspirin used for primary prevention in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139675
Primary Topic
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139675: Short- and long-term impact of aspirin cessation in older adults: a target trial emulation.

Mark Nelson, Katherine L. Webb, Robyn L. Woods, Michael E. Ernst et al.
Circulation
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
article

Abstract 4139675: Short- and long-term impact of aspirin cessation in older adults: a target trial emulation.

Mark Nelson, Katherine L. Webb, Robyn L. Woods, Michael E. Ernst, Rory Wolfe, Zhen Zhou
article en

Abstract

Background: The net benefit of aspirin cessation in older adults remains uncertain. This study aimed to use observational data to emulate a randomized trial of aspirin cessation versus continuation in older adults without cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods: Post-hoc analysis using a target trial emulation framework ( Table 1 ) applied to the immediate post-trial period (2017-2021) of a study of low-dose aspirin initiation in 19,114 adults aged 70 years and older (ASPREE; NCT01038583). Participants from Australia and US were included if they were free of CVD at the start of the post-trial intervention period (time zero, T0) and had been taking open-label or randomized aspirin immediately before T0 ( Fig 1A ). The two groups in the target trial were: aspirin cessation (participants who were taking randomized aspirin immediately before T0; assumed to have stopped at T0 as instructed) versus aspirin continuation (participants on open-label aspirin at T0 regardless of their randomized treatment; assumed to have continued at T0). The outcomes after T0 were incident CVD, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, and major bleeding during 3, 6, and 12 months (short-term), and 48 months (long-term) follow-up. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing aspirin cessation to continuation were estimated from propensity-score (PS) adjusted Cox proportional-hazards regression models. Results: We included 6,103 CVD-free participants (cessation: 5,427, continuation: 676). Participant selection flow chart is presented in Fig 1B . Over both short- and long-term follow-up, aspirin cessation versus continuation was not associated with elevated risk of CVD, MACE and all-cause mortality (HRs, at 3 and 48 months respectively were, 1.23 and 0.73 for CVD; 1.11 and 0.84 for MACE; 0.23 and 0.79 for all-cause mortality, p >0.05) but cessation had a reduced risk of incident major bleeding events (HRs at 3 and 48 months, 0.16 and 0.63, p <0.05) ( Fig 1C ). Similar findings were seen for all outcomes at 6 and 12 months, except for a lowered risk of all-cause mortality in the cessation group at 12 months ( Fig 1C ). Conclusions: Our findings support the safety of deprescribing prophylactic aspirin used for primary prevention in older adults.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of Iowa (US), University of Tasmania (AU), Monash University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.