Abstract 4139509: Effect Of A Comprehensive Personalized Behavioral Intervention On Cardiovascular Event-free Survival And All-Cause Event-free Survival In Veterans With Diabetic Neuropathy - The PATRIOT Randomized Clinical Trial

Background: The PATRIOT trial (2015-2021) tested a personalized behavioral intervention (PBI) to prevent diabetic foot lesions by targeting general and foot-specific diabetes care. From the hospitalizations and deaths in the trial, we evaluated if time to cardiovascular events (CVE) or all-cause events (ACE) differed between PBI and current best practice (CBP). Methods: Adults with diabetic neuropathy were recruited from two urban Veterans Affairs hospitals and randomly assigned in parallel to PBI or CBP. The PBI included monthly phone calls targeting general diabetes care (medication adherence, physical activity, diet) and foot-specific care. CBP calls focused on non-cardiovascular and non-diabetes care. Participants were followed for 1.5 years post randomization. Hospitalizations and deaths were assessed from medical record review and participant/family report. After examining if CVEs and ACEs differed between arms by logistic regression, we tested if time to CVEs or ACEs differed by arm, using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models. Further, to account for repeat events while evaluating PBI, we used negative binomial regression. We report all model estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We randomized 406 participants (203 per arm). Mean (SD) age was 67.8 (8.4) years in PBI and 68.0 (8.8) years in CBP. Both arms were similar in race, education, social support, and cardiovascular risk factors (all P > .05). There were 151 hospitalizations and 4 deaths. In total, 92 participants had at least one event and 31 had multiple events. The mean (variance) of ACEs was 0.37 (0.78). Most events (44) were CVEs (18 ischemic, 13 arrhythmic, 8 heart failure, and 5 vascular). The odds ratio for CVE in PBI vs. CBP was 0.29 (CI: 0.11, 0.67). There was longer time to CVE for PBI compared to CBP with the 1.5-year cumulative probability of CVE-free survival being 0.95 in PBI and 0.84 in CBP (log-rank P < 0.01). Controlling for age and race, the hazard ratio for CVE comparing PBI to CBP was 0.30 (CI: 0.13, 0.67). Incorporating repeat CVEs, the rate ratio comparing PBI to CBP was 0.30 (CI: 0.13, 0.67). For ACE, PBI was superior to CBP, consistent with all the CVE analyses. Conclusions: The PBI led to greater CVE-free and ACE-free survival. Such comprehensive interventions that target a specific outcome also holds promise for preventing other serious outcomes, probably through raised health consciousness and more healthful behaviors. Registration: NCT02356757

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139509
Primary Topic
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139509: Effect Of A Comprehensive Personalized Behavioral Intervention On Cardiovascular Event-free Survival And All-Cause Event-free Survival In Veterans With Diabetic Neuropathy - The PATRIOT Randomized Clinical Trial

Tim B. Bigdeli, Panagiotis Kougias, Y. Magar, Laura Haley et al.
Circulation
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
article

Abstract 4139509: Effect Of A Comprehensive Personalized Behavioral Intervention On Cardiovascular Event-free Survival And All-Cause Event-free Survival In Veterans With Diabetic Neuropathy - The PATRIOT Randomized Clinical Trial

Tim B. Bigdeli, Panagiotis Kougias, Y. Magar, Laura Haley, Kevin T. Stroupe, Andrew Nicholson, Sherene Sharath, Nicholas Illenberger, Preethi Kumar, S. Natarajan
article en

Abstract

Background: The PATRIOT trial (2015-2021) tested a personalized behavioral intervention (PBI) to prevent diabetic foot lesions by targeting general and foot-specific diabetes care. From the hospitalizations and deaths in the trial, we evaluated if time to cardiovascular events (CVE) or all-cause events (ACE) differed between PBI and current best practice (CBP). Methods: Adults with diabetic neuropathy were recruited from two urban Veterans Affairs hospitals and randomly assigned in parallel to PBI or CBP. The PBI included monthly phone calls targeting general diabetes care (medication adherence, physical activity, diet) and foot-specific care. CBP calls focused on non-cardiovascular and non-diabetes care. Participants were followed for 1.5 years post randomization. Hospitalizations and deaths were assessed from medical record review and participant/family report. After examining if CVEs and ACEs differed between arms by logistic regression, we tested if time to CVEs or ACEs differed by arm, using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models. Further, to account for repeat events while evaluating PBI, we used negative binomial regression. We report all model estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: We randomized 406 participants (203 per arm). Mean (SD) age was 67.8 (8.4) years in PBI and 68.0 (8.8) years in CBP. Both arms were similar in race, education, social support, and cardiovascular risk factors (all P > .05). There were 151 hospitalizations and 4 deaths. In total, 92 participants had at least one event and 31 had multiple events. The mean (variance) of ACEs was 0.37 (0.78). Most events (44) were CVEs (18 ischemic, 13 arrhythmic, 8 heart failure, and 5 vascular). The odds ratio for CVE in PBI vs. CBP was 0.29 (CI: 0.11, 0.67). There was longer time to CVE for PBI compared to CBP with the 1.5-year cumulative probability of CVE-free survival being 0.95 in PBI and 0.84 in CBP (log-rank P < 0.01). Controlling for age and race, the hazard ratio for CVE comparing PBI to CBP was 0.30 (CI: 0.13, 0.67). Incorporating repeat CVEs, the rate ratio comparing PBI to CBP was 0.30 (CI: 0.13, 0.67). For ACE, PBI was superior to CBP, consistent with all the CVE analyses. Conclusions: The PBI led to greater CVE-free and ACE-free survival. Such comprehensive interventions that target a specific outcome also holds promise for preventing other serious outcomes, probably through raised health consciousness and more healthful behaviors. Registration: NCT02356757

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
VA NY Harbor Healthcare System (US), Edward Hines, Jr. VA Hospital (US), NYU Langone Health (US), New York University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Health and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.