Abstract 4139790: Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction According to Age: the GALACTIC-HF Trial

Background: Older age is associated with a high prevalence of comorbidities and worse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM), a selective cardiac myosin activator, is relatively hemodynamically neutral with no known extra-cardiac effects, and thus may be well-tolerated in older individuals with comorbidities (e.g., low blood pressure or renal dysfunction). The safety profile and clinical benefits of OM across the age spectrum remain uncertain. Purpose: To assess the CV outcomes, treatment response and tolerability to OM according to age, in patients enrolled in the GALACTIC-HF trial. Methods: GALACTIC-HF was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial testing OM vs placebo in patients with symptomatic HF. Key eligibility criteria included an age between 18 and 85 years, elevated natriuretic peptides and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. We examined the treatment effect of OM vs placebo for the primary endpoint of CV death or first HF event (hospitalization or urgent visit for HF), in the overall population and severe HF subgroup (LVEF≤30%, New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III/IV, HF hospitalization within 6 months), as well as safety outcomes according to predefined age groups (<65 or ≥65). Results: A total of 8,232 patients (age 64.5±11.4 years, 54.5% ≥65 years, 21% women) were included. The rate of the primary outcome was 21.4 per 100py in age <65 years and 28.8 per 100py in age ≥65 years. The treatment effect of OM for the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.99; p=0.025) was consistent in age groups (P interaction =0.73, Figure 1 Panel A ) and irrespective of age as a continuous variable (P interaction =0.19), after adjustment for treatment interactions with known modifiers of the effects of OM (LVEF and baseline atrial fibrillation status). In patients with severe HF, OM significantly reduced the risk of the primary outcome in both age <65 years (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92) and age ≥65 years (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.97; P interaction =0.72, Figure 1 Panel B ). The safety profile of OM was consistent irrespective of age (P interaction >0.05 for all, Table 1 ). Conclusions: In GALACTIC-HF, older individuals were well-represented and faced higher risks of CV events. Treatment with OM was safe irrespective of age, and reduced the risk of CV death or first HF event across the age spectrum, especially in those with severe HF.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139790
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139790: Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction According to Age: the GALACTIC-HF Trial

Stephen B. Heitner, John R. Teerlink, G. Michael Felker, John J.V. McMurray et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4139790: Efficacy and Safety of Omecamtiv Mecarbil in Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction According to Age: the GALACTIC-HF Trial

Stephen B. Heitner, John R. Teerlink, G. Michael Felker, John J.V. McMurray, Brian Claggett, Marco Metra, Scott David Solomon, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Fady I. Malik, Henri Lu, Rafael Díaz
article en

Abstract

Background: Older age is associated with a high prevalence of comorbidities and worse cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Omecamtiv mecarbil (OM), a selective cardiac myosin activator, is relatively hemodynamically neutral with no known extra-cardiac effects, and thus may be well-tolerated in older individuals with comorbidities (e.g., low blood pressure or renal dysfunction). The safety profile and clinical benefits of OM across the age spectrum remain uncertain. Purpose: To assess the CV outcomes, treatment response and tolerability to OM according to age, in patients enrolled in the GALACTIC-HF trial. Methods: GALACTIC-HF was a randomized, double-blind clinical trial testing OM vs placebo in patients with symptomatic HF. Key eligibility criteria included an age between 18 and 85 years, elevated natriuretic peptides and a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤35%. We examined the treatment effect of OM vs placebo for the primary endpoint of CV death or first HF event (hospitalization or urgent visit for HF), in the overall population and severe HF subgroup (LVEF≤30%, New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class III/IV, HF hospitalization within 6 months), as well as safety outcomes according to predefined age groups (<65 or ≥65). Results: A total of 8,232 patients (age 64.5±11.4 years, 54.5% ≥65 years, 21% women) were included. The rate of the primary outcome was 21.4 per 100py in age <65 years and 28.8 per 100py in age ≥65 years. The treatment effect of OM for the primary outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.86-0.99; p=0.025) was consistent in age groups (P interaction =0.73, Figure 1 Panel A ) and irrespective of age as a continuous variable (P interaction =0.19), after adjustment for treatment interactions with known modifiers of the effects of OM (LVEF and baseline atrial fibrillation status). In patients with severe HF, OM significantly reduced the risk of the primary outcome in both age <65 years (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.64-0.92) and age ≥65 years (HR 0.83; 95% CI 0.71-0.97; P interaction =0.72, Figure 1 Panel B ). The safety profile of OM was consistent irrespective of age (P interaction >0.05 for all, Table 1 ). Conclusions: In GALACTIC-HF, older individuals were well-represented and faced higher risks of CV events. Treatment with OM was safe irrespective of age, and reduced the risk of CV death or first HF event across the age spectrum, especially in those with severe HF.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), San Francisco VA Medical Center (US), British Heart Foundation (GB), Clinical Research Institute (US), Cytokinetics (United States) (US), Instituto Cardiovascular de Rosario (AR), University of Brescia (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.