Abstract 4139873: Isolated Tricuspid Replacement versus Repair among Medicare Beneficiaries

Background: Evidence is limited regarding mid-term outcomes following isolated tricuspid operations for tricuspid regurgitation at the population level. Objective: This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes following isolated tricuspid valve replacement versus repair using contemporary data. Methods: We analyzed the national data on Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 who underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair between January 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was mid-term (up to 3 years) all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included mid-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure hospitalizations, as well as in-hospital permanent pacemaker implantation rates. MACE comprised all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and tricuspid reoperations. A propensity score-matching analysis was conducted to compare the two groups. Results: A total of 1,693 patients were included (replacement= 655 patients, repair= 1,038 patients). In the matched cohort (597 patients in each group), the overall mortality and MACE were 40% and 47% at 3 years, respectively. Tricuspid valve replacement was associated with similar all-cause mortality in comparison to repair (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.39; P=0.15). Similarly, the rates of MACE and heart failure hospitalizations were similar (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.32, P=0.27; subdistribution HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.75-1.54, P=0.69, respectively) between these two procedures. Patients undergoing replacement required permanent pacemaker implantations more frequently (25.4% vs. 12.4%; P<0.001). Conclusions: Isolated surgical tricuspid valve replacement was associated with similar clinical outcomes compared to repair, except for permanent pacemaker implantation rates. The overall high mid-term mortality and morbidity with either treatment highlight the need for better options and further research to optimize the indication and timing of intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4139873
Primary Topic
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4139873: Isolated Tricuspid Replacement versus Repair among Medicare Beneficiaries

Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Yusuke Tsugawa, Hiroshi Gotanda, Tomonari Shimoda et al.
Circulation
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
article

Abstract 4139873: Isolated Tricuspid Replacement versus Repair among Medicare Beneficiaries

Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Yusuke Tsugawa, Hiroshi Gotanda, Tomonari Shimoda, Sammy Elmariah, Hiroki Ueyama, Shinichi Fukuhara, Atsuyuki Watanabe, Toshiki Kuno, Yujiro Yokoyama, Yoshihisa Miyamoto
article en

Abstract

Background: Evidence is limited regarding mid-term outcomes following isolated tricuspid operations for tricuspid regurgitation at the population level. Objective: This study aimed to compare the mid-term outcomes following isolated tricuspid valve replacement versus repair using contemporary data. Methods: We analyzed the national data on Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 who underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair between January 2016 and December 2020. The primary outcome was mid-term (up to 3 years) all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes included mid-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and heart failure hospitalizations, as well as in-hospital permanent pacemaker implantation rates. MACE comprised all-cause mortality, heart failure hospitalization, stroke, and tricuspid reoperations. A propensity score-matching analysis was conducted to compare the two groups. Results: A total of 1,693 patients were included (replacement= 655 patients, repair= 1,038 patients). In the matched cohort (597 patients in each group), the overall mortality and MACE were 40% and 47% at 3 years, respectively. Tricuspid valve replacement was associated with similar all-cause mortality in comparison to repair (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.95-1.39; P=0.15). Similarly, the rates of MACE and heart failure hospitalizations were similar (adjusted HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.32, P=0.27; subdistribution HR, 1.07, 95% CI, 0.75-1.54, P=0.69, respectively) between these two procedures. Patients undergoing replacement required permanent pacemaker implantations more frequently (25.4% vs. 12.4%; P<0.001). Conclusions: Isolated surgical tricuspid valve replacement was associated with similar clinical outcomes compared to repair, except for permanent pacemaker implantation rates. The overall high mid-term mortality and morbidity with either treatment highlight the need for better options and further research to optimize the indication and timing of intervention.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Emory University (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), University of Michigan (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), Michigan United (US), University of Tsukuba Hospital (JP), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 71%
Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.