Abstract 4140208: Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) using Electronic Health Record Data

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents 50% of heart failure patients. Predictive models in HFpEF, specifically those derived from electronic health record (EHR) data, are less established. HYPOTHESIS: EHR models can predict 30-day and 1-year mortality in HFpEF patients. Machine learning (ML) models compared with traditional may show superior performance. AIM: Develop and compare prediction models for 30-day and 1-year mortality in HFpEF using EHR data, using traditional and ML techniques. Methods: Using MIMIC-IV data (EHR data from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston) from 2008-2019, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted with a primary diagnosis of HFpEF using ICD-9 and 10 codes. Demographics, vital signs, prior diagnoses, and lab data were extracted. After preprocessing, data was partitioned into 70% training and 30% test. Prediction models from seven model classes were developed using a variety of imputation and oversampling techniques using 5-fold cross validation - Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net, Random Forest, HistGradient Boosting Classifier, and XGBoost. Model performance was compared using several metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to assess individual feature influence on model output. Results: Among 3910 individual hospitalizations for HFpEF the 30-day mortality was 6.3% and 1-year mortality was 29.2%. Performance metrics of the best model in each class is shown in Table 1. By AUCs, Lasso and Elastic Net Regression models provided superior prediction for 30-day mortality (AUCs of 0.79, each), whereas Random Forest and HistGradient Boosting Classifier for 1-year mortality (AUCs of 0.78 each). Overall, considering all metrics, Elastic Net and Lasso regression models gave a good combination of sensitivity, specificity and AUC enhancing their clinical applicability. SHAP analyses showed age, NT-proBNP and sodium levels, WBC, and platelet counts as key drivers of these predictions. Conclusion: Models derived from EHR data, which is important for implementability, predict mortality after HFpEF hospitalization with good performance comparable to models derived from registry or trial data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140208
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140208: Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) using Electronic Health Record Data

Il‐Seon Shin, Karthik Murugiah, Alaa Alashi, Keervani Kandala et al.
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
article

Abstract 4140208: Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) using Electronic Health Record Data

Il‐Seon Shin, Karthik Murugiah, Alaa Alashi, Keervani Kandala, Nilay Bhatt
article en

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represents 50% of heart failure patients. Predictive models in HFpEF, specifically those derived from electronic health record (EHR) data, are less established. HYPOTHESIS: EHR models can predict 30-day and 1-year mortality in HFpEF patients. Machine learning (ML) models compared with traditional may show superior performance. AIM: Develop and compare prediction models for 30-day and 1-year mortality in HFpEF using EHR data, using traditional and ML techniques. Methods: Using MIMIC-IV data (EHR data from the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston) from 2008-2019, we identified patients aged ≥ 18 years admitted with a primary diagnosis of HFpEF using ICD-9 and 10 codes. Demographics, vital signs, prior diagnoses, and lab data were extracted. After preprocessing, data was partitioned into 70% training and 30% test. Prediction models from seven model classes were developed using a variety of imputation and oversampling techniques using 5-fold cross validation - Support Vector Classifier (SVC), Logistic Regression, Lasso Regression, Elastic Net, Random Forest, HistGradient Boosting Classifier, and XGBoost. Model performance was compared using several metrics. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was used to assess individual feature influence on model output. Results: Among 3910 individual hospitalizations for HFpEF the 30-day mortality was 6.3% and 1-year mortality was 29.2%. Performance metrics of the best model in each class is shown in Table 1. By AUCs, Lasso and Elastic Net Regression models provided superior prediction for 30-day mortality (AUCs of 0.79, each), whereas Random Forest and HistGradient Boosting Classifier for 1-year mortality (AUCs of 0.78 each). Overall, considering all metrics, Elastic Net and Lasso regression models gave a good combination of sensitivity, specificity and AUC enhancing their clinical applicability. SHAP analyses showed age, NT-proBNP and sodium levels, WBC, and platelet counts as key drivers of these predictions. Conclusion: Models derived from EHR data, which is important for implementability, predict mortality after HFpEF hospitalization with good performance comparable to models derived from registry or trial data.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Yale University (US), Yale New Haven Health System (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.