Abstract 4140454: The Outcome of Restrictive Cardiac Allograft Physiology in Severe Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy

Background: Microvascular dysfunction after heart transplantation leads to restrictive cardiac allograft physiology (RCP), which is classified to severe coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV); however, the prognosis of RCP remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the prognosis of RCP in comparison with that of severe angiographic CAV. Methods: We assessed patients with RCP defined as mean right atrial pressure >12 mmHg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >25 mmHg, and cardiac index <2.0 L/min/m 2 who underwent heart transplantation between 2004 and 2023. The primary outcome was death or re-transplantation. Results: Of the 116 patients with severe CAV, 42 had RCP (RCP-CAV group) and 74 had severe angiographic CAV without RCP (Angio-CAV group). A significantly shorter time from heart transplantation to diagnosis and lower subsequent percutaneous catheter intervention after diagnosis were seen in the RCP-CAV group than in the Angio-CAV group (both p<0.001). The incidence of death or re-transplantation within 5 years after was significantly higher in the RCP-CAV group than in the Angio-CAV group (69.0% vs 50.0%, p=0.047). Freedom from death or re-transplantation at 5 years was significantly worse in the RCP-CAV group compared to the Angio-CAV group (18.4% vs 35.4%, p=0.001). In the Cox proportional hazard model, RCP was independently associated with an increased risk of death or re-transplantation (Hazard ratio 2.08, 95% Confidence intervals 1.26-3.44, p=0.004). Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with RCP was significantly worse than that of patients with severe angiographic CAV. The early detection of microvascular dysfunction and re-transplantation listing may improve the prognosis of patients with RCP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140454
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140454: The Outcome of Restrictive Cardiac Allograft Physiology in Severe Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy

Evan Kransdorf, Andriana Nikolova, Jon Kobashigawa, L. Stern et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
0.40
article

Abstract 4140454: The Outcome of Restrictive Cardiac Allograft Physiology in Severe Coronary Allograft Vasculopathy

Evan Kransdorf, Andriana Nikolova, Jon Kobashigawa, L. Stern, M. Kittleson, Jignesh M. Patel, David Chang, Nayana Bhatnagar, Masaki Tsuji
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Microvascular dysfunction after heart transplantation leads to restrictive cardiac allograft physiology (RCP), which is classified to severe coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV); however, the prognosis of RCP remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the prognosis of RCP in comparison with that of severe angiographic CAV. Methods: We assessed patients with RCP defined as mean right atrial pressure >12 mmHg, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure >25 mmHg, and cardiac index <2.0 L/min/m 2 who underwent heart transplantation between 2004 and 2023. The primary outcome was death or re-transplantation. Results: Of the 116 patients with severe CAV, 42 had RCP (RCP-CAV group) and 74 had severe angiographic CAV without RCP (Angio-CAV group). A significantly shorter time from heart transplantation to diagnosis and lower subsequent percutaneous catheter intervention after diagnosis were seen in the RCP-CAV group than in the Angio-CAV group (both p<0.001). The incidence of death or re-transplantation within 5 years after was significantly higher in the RCP-CAV group than in the Angio-CAV group (69.0% vs 50.0%, p=0.047). Freedom from death or re-transplantation at 5 years was significantly worse in the RCP-CAV group compared to the Angio-CAV group (18.4% vs 35.4%, p=0.001). In the Cox proportional hazard model, RCP was independently associated with an increased risk of death or re-transplantation (Hazard ratio 2.08, 95% Confidence intervals 1.26-3.44, p=0.004). Conclusions: The prognosis of patients with RCP was significantly worse than that of patients with severe angiographic CAV. The early detection of microvascular dysfunction and re-transplantation listing may improve the prognosis of patients with RCP.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Cedars-Sinai Smidt Heart Institute (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cardiovascular Issues in Pregnancy
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.