Abstract 4140053: Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with Concomitant Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis

Aims: This study aimed to explore the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. Method: We enrolled patients with HFrEF and ESRD on hemodialysis using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2017–2021) covering the entire national population. A total of 2,248 patients with HFrEF who received SV were compared with 2,528 patients with HFrEF who received RAS blockade by inverse probability treatment weights. The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite outcome of all-cause mortality or any hospitalization. Differential effects according to medication adherence were also analyzed using proportion of days covered (PDC). Results: SV reduced the risk of the primary outcome compared to the RAS blockade group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.96, P = 0.009). SV significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.59-0.93, P = 0.008) and any hospitalization (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.95, P = 0.007). In the group with a PDC ≥80%, SV reduced the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular mortality and any hospitalization than RAS blockade (all-cause mortality, HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46–0.80; P <0.001, cardiovascular mortality, HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.43-0.82, P = 0.001, any hospitalization, HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.80-0.94, P = 0.007). Conclusions: In a real-world population with concomitant HFrEF and ESRD on hemodialysis, SV significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization compared to the RAS blockade. These benefits were more definite in a subpopulation with a PDC ≥ 80%, suggesting the importance of medication adherence in improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140053
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140053: Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with Concomitant Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis

Dong-Hyuk Cho, Yuran Ahn, Mi‐Hyang Jung, Byung‐Su Yoo et al.
Circulation
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Abstract 4140053: Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan in Patients with Concomitant Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction and End-Stage Renal Disease on Hemodialysis

Dong-Hyuk Cho, Yuran Ahn, Mi‐Hyang Jung, Byung‐Su Yoo, Jong‐Chan Youn, Jimi Choi
article en

Abstract

Aims: This study aimed to explore the comparative effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan (SV) to renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockade in patients with concomitant heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. Method: We enrolled patients with HFrEF and ESRD on hemodialysis using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service data (2017–2021) covering the entire national population. A total of 2,248 patients with HFrEF who received SV were compared with 2,528 patients with HFrEF who received RAS blockade by inverse probability treatment weights. The primary endpoint was a 2-year composite outcome of all-cause mortality or any hospitalization. Differential effects according to medication adherence were also analyzed using proportion of days covered (PDC). Results: SV reduced the risk of the primary outcome compared to the RAS blockade group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75–0.96, P = 0.009). SV significantly reduced all-cause mortality (HR 0.74; 95% CI 0.59-0.93, P = 0.008) and any hospitalization (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.75-0.95, P = 0.007). In the group with a PDC ≥80%, SV reduced the risk of all-cause, cardiovascular mortality and any hospitalization than RAS blockade (all-cause mortality, HR 0.61; 95% CI 0.46–0.80; P <0.001, cardiovascular mortality, HR 0.59; 95% CI 0.43-0.82, P = 0.001, any hospitalization, HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.80-0.94, P = 0.007). Conclusions: In a real-world population with concomitant HFrEF and ESRD on hemodialysis, SV significantly reduced the risk of all-cause mortality and any hospitalization compared to the RAS blockade. These benefits were more definite in a subpopulation with a PDC ≥ 80%, suggesting the importance of medication adherence in improving cardiovascular outcomes.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Yonsei University (KR), Korea University (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital (KR), The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital (KR), Catholic University of Korea (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.