Abstract 4140480: The Relationship Between Obesity Status and Change in NT-proBNP with Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: Results from the PARAGLI
Background: In PARAGLIDE-HF, patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a recent worsening HF event randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) vs val had a significantly larger reduction in NT-proBNP and were numerically more likely to derive clinical benefit as assessed by a win ratio. Patients with obesity and HFpEF may represent a unique phenotype, characterized by a high risk for recurrent HF hospitalization and lower levels of NT-proBNP. Research Question: Does BMI category modify the relationship between sac/val vs val on NT-proBNP change and/or a win ratio among patients with HFpEF or mildly reduced EF? Methods: To assess the interaction between BMI and sac/val vs val on NT-proBNP, the time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 was assessed with an analysis of covariance model including the interaction of treatment-by-BMI group (obese with BMI ≥30 vs normal/overweight, BMI 18.5 to <30 kg/m 2 ). A win ratio of cardiovascular death, total HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and change in NT-proBNP was calculated for both BMI groups, including an interaction term with significance set at ≤0.1. Results: Overall, 65% (n=298) of patients had obesity and 35% (n=164) of patients had normal/overweight. When the interaction between BMI category and the effect of sac/val vs val on the time-averaged proportional change from baseline NT-proBNP was assessed, patients with obesity had a non-significant but numerically larger decrease in NT-proBNP ( Table ). Patients with obesity were also more likely to derive clinical benefit overall from sac/val vs val as compared to patients with normal/overweight (win ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.90 vs 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.32, p interaction = 0.09). Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved EF and obesity may experience a larger clinical benefit from sac/val than patients with normal/overweight BMI.
Authors
- Alexander Peikert (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0947-5865)
- Josephine Harrington (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5169-117X)
- Adrian F. Hernandez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3387-9616)
- Anuradha Lala (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6479-6958)
- Eric J. Velazquez (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2245-7477)
- Kristin Williamson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2131-0481)
- Randall C. Starling (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1254-4860)
- Kavita Sharma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3012-1765)
- Scott David Solomon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3698-9597)
- Robert John Mentz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3222-1719)
- Jonathan H. Ward (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6739-6567)
- Shelley R. Zieroth (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6145-9814)
- Kirkwood F. Adams
Institutions
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Cleveland Clinic (US)
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- University of Graz (AT)
- Duke University (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Clinical Research Institute (US)
- Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
- Novartis (United States) (US)
- University of Manitoba (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation
- Published
- 2024-11-12
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140480
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.40