Abstract 4140480: The Relationship Between Obesity Status and Change in NT-proBNP with Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: Results from the PARAGLI

Background: In PARAGLIDE-HF, patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a recent worsening HF event randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) vs val had a significantly larger reduction in NT-proBNP and were numerically more likely to derive clinical benefit as assessed by a win ratio. Patients with obesity and HFpEF may represent a unique phenotype, characterized by a high risk for recurrent HF hospitalization and lower levels of NT-proBNP. Research Question: Does BMI category modify the relationship between sac/val vs val on NT-proBNP change and/or a win ratio among patients with HFpEF or mildly reduced EF? Methods: To assess the interaction between BMI and sac/val vs val on NT-proBNP, the time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 was assessed with an analysis of covariance model including the interaction of treatment-by-BMI group (obese with BMI ≥30 vs normal/overweight, BMI 18.5 to <30 kg/m 2 ). A win ratio of cardiovascular death, total HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and change in NT-proBNP was calculated for both BMI groups, including an interaction term with significance set at ≤0.1. Results: Overall, 65% (n=298) of patients had obesity and 35% (n=164) of patients had normal/overweight. When the interaction between BMI category and the effect of sac/val vs val on the time-averaged proportional change from baseline NT-proBNP was assessed, patients with obesity had a non-significant but numerically larger decrease in NT-proBNP ( Table ). Patients with obesity were also more likely to derive clinical benefit overall from sac/val vs val as compared to patients with normal/overweight (win ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.90 vs 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.32, p interaction = 0.09). Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved EF and obesity may experience a larger clinical benefit from sac/val than patients with normal/overweight BMI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140480
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140480: The Relationship Between Obesity Status and Change in NT-proBNP with Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: Results from the PARAGLI

Alexander Peikert, Josephine Harrington, Adrian F. Hernandez, Anuradha Lala et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
0.40
article

Abstract 4140480: The Relationship Between Obesity Status and Change in NT-proBNP with Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients with Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Recent Worsening Heart Failure Event: Results from the PARAGLI

Alexander Peikert, Josephine Harrington, Adrian F. Hernandez, Anuradha Lala, Eric J. Velazquez, Kristin Williamson, Randall C. Starling, Kavita Sharma, Scott David Solomon, Robert John Mentz, Jonathan H. Ward, Shelley R. Zieroth, Kirkwood F. Adams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: In PARAGLIDE-HF, patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and a recent worsening HF event randomized to sacubitril/valsartan (sac/val) vs val had a significantly larger reduction in NT-proBNP and were numerically more likely to derive clinical benefit as assessed by a win ratio. Patients with obesity and HFpEF may represent a unique phenotype, characterized by a high risk for recurrent HF hospitalization and lower levels of NT-proBNP. Research Question: Does BMI category modify the relationship between sac/val vs val on NT-proBNP change and/or a win ratio among patients with HFpEF or mildly reduced EF? Methods: To assess the interaction between BMI and sac/val vs val on NT-proBNP, the time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP from baseline to Weeks 4 and 8 was assessed with an analysis of covariance model including the interaction of treatment-by-BMI group (obese with BMI ≥30 vs normal/overweight, BMI 18.5 to <30 kg/m 2 ). A win ratio of cardiovascular death, total HF hospitalizations, urgent HF visits, and change in NT-proBNP was calculated for both BMI groups, including an interaction term with significance set at ≤0.1. Results: Overall, 65% (n=298) of patients had obesity and 35% (n=164) of patients had normal/overweight. When the interaction between BMI category and the effect of sac/val vs val on the time-averaged proportional change from baseline NT-proBNP was assessed, patients with obesity had a non-significant but numerically larger decrease in NT-proBNP ( Table ). Patients with obesity were also more likely to derive clinical benefit overall from sac/val vs val as compared to patients with normal/overweight (win ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.90 vs 0.90, 95% CI 0.62-1.32, p interaction = 0.09). Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved EF and obesity may experience a larger clinical benefit from sac/val than patients with normal/overweight BMI.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US), Brigham and Women's Hospital (US), Cleveland Clinic (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Graz (AT), Duke University (US), Yale University (US), Clinical Research Institute (US), Mount Sinai Hospital (US), Novartis (United States) (US), University of Manitoba (CA)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.