Abstract 4140502: Preventive Effects of Nitric Oxide Donors in Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Angiography: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess the latest evidence on the preventive effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors in CIN in patients undergoing CAG/PCI. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until May 5th, 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3). Results: Our analysis included 13 RCTs encompassing 3,550 patients. NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CIN compared to placebo either as an oral administration (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.26, 0.42], P< 0.01) or IV infusions (RR: 0.56 with 95% CI [0.40, 0.78], P< 0.01). Moreover, NO donors were significantly associated with decreased serum creatinine levels compared to placebo either as an oral administration (MD: -0.07 with 95% CI [-0.10, -0.04], P< 0.01) or IV infusions (MD: -0.07 with 95% CI [-0.09, -0.04], P< 0.01). In terms of safety, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of MACE compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.64 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.89], P< 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in MACE (RR: 0.68 with 95% CI [0.38, 1.21], P= 0.18). Finally, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.36, 0.94], P= 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.84 with 95% CI [0.40, 8.52], P= 0.44). Conclusion: NO donors as an adjunct therapy are associated with reduced incidence of CIN, and decreased serum creatinine levels either as an oral or IV administration. Also, it was associated with decreased incidence of MACE and all-cause mortality as an oral administration which make this simple low-cost intervention an important therapeutic option in patients undergoing CAG/PCI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140502
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140502: Preventive Effects of Nitric Oxide Donors in Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Angiography: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.

Abdelrahman Mahmoud, AlMothana Manasrah, Basel Abdelazeem, Ahmed Emara et al.
Circulation
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
article

Abstract 4140502: Preventive Effects of Nitric Oxide Donors in Contrast-induced Nephropathy in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Angiography: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of 13 randomized controlled trials.

Abdelrahman Mahmoud, AlMothana Manasrah, Basel Abdelazeem, Ahmed Emara, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Shehroze Tabassum, Mohamed Gaber, Ahmed A. Ibrahim, Mohamed Saad Rakab, Mohamed Rifai
article en

Abstract

Background: Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing coronary angiography (CAG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We aimed to assess the latest evidence on the preventive effects of nitric oxide (NO) donors in CIN in patients undergoing CAG/PCI. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs from PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane searches until May 5th, 2024. Dichotomous data were pooled using risk ratio (RR), and continuous data were pooled using mean difference (MD), both with a 95% confidence interval (CI), using (R version 4.3). Results: Our analysis included 13 RCTs encompassing 3,550 patients. NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of CIN compared to placebo either as an oral administration (RR: 0.33 with 95% CI [0.26, 0.42], P< 0.01) or IV infusions (RR: 0.56 with 95% CI [0.40, 0.78], P< 0.01). Moreover, NO donors were significantly associated with decreased serum creatinine levels compared to placebo either as an oral administration (MD: -0.07 with 95% CI [-0.10, -0.04], P< 0.01) or IV infusions (MD: -0.07 with 95% CI [-0.09, -0.04], P< 0.01). In terms of safety, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of MACE compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.64 with 95% CI [0.45, 0.89], P< 0.01). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in MACE (RR: 0.68 with 95% CI [0.38, 1.21], P= 0.18). Finally, NO donors were significantly associated with a decreased incidence of all-cause mortality compared to placebo as an oral administration (RR: 0.58 with 95% CI [0.36, 0.94], P= 0.03). However, there was no significant difference between NO donors as IV infusions and placebo in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.84 with 95% CI [0.40, 8.52], P= 0.44). Conclusion: NO donors as an adjunct therapy are associated with reduced incidence of CIN, and decreased serum creatinine levels either as an oral or IV administration. Also, it was associated with decreased incidence of MACE and all-cause mortality as an oral administration which make this simple low-cost intervention an important therapeutic option in patients undergoing CAG/PCI.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
West Virginia University (US), King Edward Medical University (PK), Mansoura University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Menoufia University (EG), Minia University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.