Abstract 4140686: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Lower Extremity Bypass versus Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes Mellitus

Background: Comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Both lower extremity bypass (LEB) and peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) have demonstrated improved outcomes in peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, comparative effectiveness data for LEB versus PVI in patients with CLTI and DM is limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare 30-day and 90-day (1) all-cause mortality, and (2) major amputation rates among patients with CLTI and comorbid DM undergoing LEB versus PVI. Methods: Patients undergoing LEB and PVI were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, linked with Medicare claims outcomes data. Propensity scores were generated using 12 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was employed. The 30-day and 90-day mortality risks for LEB versus PVI were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models, incorporating interaction terms for DM. For amputation outcomes, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray competing risks models were employed, with interaction terms for DM included. Results: Among 4,210 patients undergoing LEB or PVI (2,105 in each group), the mean age was 70.9 ± 10.9 years, with 69.3% being male and 76.4% white. DM was present in 62.3% (2,662 patients). In patients with DM, 30-day all-cause mortality rates were comparable between the LEB and PVI groups (2.1% vs. 2.6%; log-rank p-value=0.844). However, LEB was associated with significantly lower 90-day all-cause mortality rates compared to PVI (5.1% vs. 7.6%; log-rank p-value=0.013). Additionally, LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day major amputation rates compared to PVI (2.7% vs. 4.2%; p=0.049), though no significant difference was observed in 90-day major amputation rates (9.4% vs. 10.9%; p=0.196). Conclusion: Among patients with CLTI and comorbid DM, LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day major amputation rates and 90-day all-cause mortality compared to PVI. These findings provide contemporary insights into the management of CLTI in diabetic patients, supporting informed shared decision-making for those often considered high-risk for surgical intervention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140686
Primary Topic
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140686: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Lower Extremity Bypass versus Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes Mellitus

Jacob Cleman, Kim G. Smolderen, Gaëlle Romain, Carlos Mena‐Hurtado et al.
Circulation
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
article

Abstract 4140686: Comparison of Short-Term Outcomes after Lower Extremity Bypass versus Peripheral Vascular Intervention in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia and Diabetes Mellitus

Jacob Cleman, Kim G. Smolderen, Gaëlle Romain, Carlos Mena‐Hurtado, Abhinav Aggarwal, Santiago Callegari
article en

Abstract

Background: Comorbid diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). Both lower extremity bypass (LEB) and peripheral vascular interventions (PVI) have demonstrated improved outcomes in peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, comparative effectiveness data for LEB versus PVI in patients with CLTI and DM is limited. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate and compare 30-day and 90-day (1) all-cause mortality, and (2) major amputation rates among patients with CLTI and comorbid DM undergoing LEB versus PVI. Methods: Patients undergoing LEB and PVI were identified from the Vascular Quality Initiative registry, linked with Medicare claims outcomes data. Propensity scores were generated using 12 variables, and a 1:1 matching method was employed. The 30-day and 90-day mortality risks for LEB versus PVI were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models, incorporating interaction terms for DM. For amputation outcomes, cumulative incidence functions and Fine-Gray competing risks models were employed, with interaction terms for DM included. Results: Among 4,210 patients undergoing LEB or PVI (2,105 in each group), the mean age was 70.9 ± 10.9 years, with 69.3% being male and 76.4% white. DM was present in 62.3% (2,662 patients). In patients with DM, 30-day all-cause mortality rates were comparable between the LEB and PVI groups (2.1% vs. 2.6%; log-rank p-value=0.844). However, LEB was associated with significantly lower 90-day all-cause mortality rates compared to PVI (5.1% vs. 7.6%; log-rank p-value=0.013). Additionally, LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day major amputation rates compared to PVI (2.7% vs. 4.2%; p=0.049), though no significant difference was observed in 90-day major amputation rates (9.4% vs. 10.9%; p=0.196). Conclusion: Among patients with CLTI and comorbid DM, LEB was associated with a lower risk of 30-day major amputation rates and 90-day all-cause mortality compared to PVI. These findings provide contemporary insights into the management of CLTI in diabetic patients, supporting informed shared decision-making for those often considered high-risk for surgical intervention.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Yale University (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Peripheral Artery Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.