Abstract 4140679: Defining the Prevalence and Incidence of Heart Failure Phenotypes Among Transgender Adults

Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults have disproportionately greater burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, prevalent and incident heart failure (HF) and its risk factors have not been well-characterized in TGD populations. Objective: To determine the prevalence and incidence of HF risk factors and phenotype by gender identity. Methods: The study included commercial insurance claims data for 408,457 adults from 2006-2022. Gender identity was classified as cisgender male, cisgender female, transmasculine, transfeminine, or unclassified TGD identity. HF risk factors and phenotype (i.e., HFrEF, HFpEF, other HF) were abstracted using administrative billing codes. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models examined associations between gender identity and prevalent and incident HF, respectively. Models were stratified by HF phenotype and adjusted for clinical comorbidities and presence of CVD. Results: Of 57,471 TGD patients, 9,652 (16.8%) were transfeminine, 17,898 (31.1%) were transmasculine, and 29,921 (52.1%) had unclassified TGD identity. The mean age was 35±16 years, followed for 5.5±4.7 years. The prevalence of HF risk factors differed by gender identity ( Table 1 ). Among TGD adults the overall prevalence of HFrEF, HFpEF, and other HF were 0.4% (n=204), 0.4% (n=222), and 1.8% (n=1,015), respectively. Prevalent HF differed by gender identity (p<0.001). In adjusted models compared to cisgender males, transmasculine persons had lower odds of HFrEF (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.21-0.71], p<0.05), unclassified TGD persons had greater odds of HFpEF (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.17-1.77], p<0.05) and lower odds of other HF (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.69-0.85], p<0.05). Compared to cisgender males, transmasculine persons had less incident HFrEF, HFpEF, and other HF; transfeminine persons had less incident HFrEF; and unclassified TGD adults had greater incident HFpEF ( Table 2 ). Conclusions: Among a nationally representative administrative sample inclusive of TGD people, CVD risk factors, prevalent HF, and incident HF differ by gender identity. Gender identity and concomitant gender-affirming therapies represent underrecognized markers of HF risk and may act as HF risk modifiers in TGD adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140679
Primary Topic
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140679: Defining the Prevalence and Incidence of Heart Failure Phenotypes Among Transgender Adults

Monica Mukherjee, Carl G. Streed, Ian Everitt, Emily Sisson
Circulation
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
article

Abstract 4140679: Defining the Prevalence and Incidence of Heart Failure Phenotypes Among Transgender Adults

Monica Mukherjee, Carl G. Streed, Ian Everitt, Emily Sisson
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) adults have disproportionately greater burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. However, prevalent and incident heart failure (HF) and its risk factors have not been well-characterized in TGD populations. Objective: To determine the prevalence and incidence of HF risk factors and phenotype by gender identity. Methods: The study included commercial insurance claims data for 408,457 adults from 2006-2022. Gender identity was classified as cisgender male, cisgender female, transmasculine, transfeminine, or unclassified TGD identity. HF risk factors and phenotype (i.e., HFrEF, HFpEF, other HF) were abstracted using administrative billing codes. Multivariate logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models examined associations between gender identity and prevalent and incident HF, respectively. Models were stratified by HF phenotype and adjusted for clinical comorbidities and presence of CVD. Results: Of 57,471 TGD patients, 9,652 (16.8%) were transfeminine, 17,898 (31.1%) were transmasculine, and 29,921 (52.1%) had unclassified TGD identity. The mean age was 35±16 years, followed for 5.5±4.7 years. The prevalence of HF risk factors differed by gender identity ( Table 1 ). Among TGD adults the overall prevalence of HFrEF, HFpEF, and other HF were 0.4% (n=204), 0.4% (n=222), and 1.8% (n=1,015), respectively. Prevalent HF differed by gender identity (p<0.001). In adjusted models compared to cisgender males, transmasculine persons had lower odds of HFrEF (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.21-0.71], p<0.05), unclassified TGD persons had greater odds of HFpEF (OR 1.44 [95% CI 1.17-1.77], p<0.05) and lower odds of other HF (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.69-0.85], p<0.05). Compared to cisgender males, transmasculine persons had less incident HFrEF, HFpEF, and other HF; transfeminine persons had less incident HFrEF; and unclassified TGD adults had greater incident HFpEF ( Table 2 ). Conclusions: Among a nationally representative administrative sample inclusive of TGD people, CVD risk factors, prevalent HF, and incident HF differ by gender identity. Gender identity and concomitant gender-affirming therapies represent underrecognized markers of HF risk and may act as HF risk modifiers in TGD adults.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Boston University (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.