Abstract 4141117: Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes by blood pressure in the SELECT trial

Introduction: Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce BP and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), little is known about whether the benefits of these therapies vary in individuals with hypertension (HT) or across the spectrum of BP categories. Research Question and Aim: To evaluate the effect of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes by baseline BP categories in SELECT. Methods: SELECT was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that included patients aged ≥45 years with preexisting CV disease and BMI ≥27 kg/m 2 without diabetes. Patients received once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo; the primary endpoint was time to first MACE analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model with semaglutide and placebo as fixed factors according to baseline BP categories. Results: Among 17,604 randomized patients, 14,392 (82%) had a history of HT. Patients with history of HT were older and more likely female, with a higher BMI, lower eGFR, and higher UACR. A higher proportion presented with atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, and heart failure NYHA class II/III, but fewer underwent coronary revascularization (Table). Patients with HT who received placebo had a higher incidence rate of MACE vs semaglutide (2.6 vs 2.1 per 100 patient-years, respectively). Semaglutide generally exhibited consistent benefits for CV outcomes regardless of history of HT or baseline BP categories (Figure). Compared with placebo, semaglutide significantly and consistently reduced systolic BP (SBP) across BP categories (normal, −2.9 [95% CI−4.0; −1.9]; elevated BP, −2.8 [−4.0; −1.6]; stage 1, −3.4: [−4.1; −2.6]; stage 2, −3.7 [− 4.4; −2.9]). Conclusions: HT is highly prevalent in people with overweight or obesity and atherosclerotic CV disease without diabetes and is associated with increased MACE. Semaglutide led to consistent reductions in MACE and lowered SBP irrespective of baseline BP category.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4141117
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4141117: Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes by blood pressure in the SELECT trial

Ildiko Lingvay, A. Michael Lincoff, G. Kees Hovingh, Bertrand Cariou et al.
1 citations
Circulation
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
0.28
article

Abstract 4141117: Semaglutide and cardiovascular outcomes by blood pressure in the SELECT trial

Ildiko Lingvay, A. Michael Lincoff, G. Kees Hovingh, Bertrand Cariou, Michael Mæng, Ana Laura de Souza Almeida Matos, Ole Kleist Jeppesen, Steven E. Kahn, Gustavs Latkovskis, Subodh Verma, Vincent Maher, John Deanfield, Philippe van de Borne, Neil Poulter, Oleksandr Parkhomenko, Yaron Arbel, Peter Kure
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Although glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce BP and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE), little is known about whether the benefits of these therapies vary in individuals with hypertension (HT) or across the spectrum of BP categories. Research Question and Aim: To evaluate the effect of once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg vs placebo on cardiovascular (CV) outcomes by baseline BP categories in SELECT. Methods: SELECT was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial that included patients aged ≥45 years with preexisting CV disease and BMI ≥27 kg/m 2 without diabetes. Patients received once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or placebo; the primary endpoint was time to first MACE analyzed with a Cox proportional hazards model with semaglutide and placebo as fixed factors according to baseline BP categories. Results: Among 17,604 randomized patients, 14,392 (82%) had a history of HT. Patients with history of HT were older and more likely female, with a higher BMI, lower eGFR, and higher UACR. A higher proportion presented with atrial fibrillation, obstructive sleep apnea, and heart failure NYHA class II/III, but fewer underwent coronary revascularization (Table). Patients with HT who received placebo had a higher incidence rate of MACE vs semaglutide (2.6 vs 2.1 per 100 patient-years, respectively). Semaglutide generally exhibited consistent benefits for CV outcomes regardless of history of HT or baseline BP categories (Figure). Compared with placebo, semaglutide significantly and consistently reduced systolic BP (SBP) across BP categories (normal, −2.9 [95% CI−4.0; −1.9]; elevated BP, −2.8 [−4.0; −1.6]; stage 1, −3.4: [−4.1; −2.6]; stage 2, −3.7 [− 4.4; −2.9]). Conclusions: HT is highly prevalent in people with overweight or obesity and atherosclerotic CV disease without diabetes and is associated with increased MACE. Semaglutide led to consistent reductions in MACE and lowered SBP irrespective of baseline BP category.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), St. Michael's Hospital (CA), Université Libre de Bruxelles (BE), Inserm (FR), Tel Aviv University (IL), University of Toronto (CA), Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK), University of Washington (US), Trinity College Dublin (IE), Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL), Aarhus University Hospital (DK), Tallaght University Hospital (IE), Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine (US), VA Puget Sound Health Care System (US), Institut du Thorax (FR), National Scientific Center "M.D. Strazhesko Institute of Cardiology" (UA), University College London (GB), Imperial College London (GB), Case Western Reserve University (US), The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US), University of Latvia (LV), Nantes Université (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Cancer Treatment and Pharmacology
0.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.