Abstract 4140690: Management of Ventricular Septal Defect after Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) can develop as a rare complication in patients undergoing bipolar radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT). Case: A 67-year-old male with nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent three VT ablations over 2 years for recurrent LV summit VT. At the initial procedure, minimal bipolar voltage abnormality but significant unipolar voltage abnormality was found at the basal interventricular septum, periaortic tissue, and left ventricular (LV) summit, consistent with mid-myocardial fibrosis. Extensive endocardial unipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed on the LV side. Despite lack of inducibility with triple extrastimuli, VT recurred that was treated with sotalol and mexiletine. One year ago, due to recurrent symptomatic VT, he underwent a redo ablation. The clinical VT mapped earliest to the right ventricular (RV) side of basal anteroseptum. Extensive RV and LV endocardial unipolar RFA was performed, but VT remained inducible. Therefore, ethanol ablation was performed through septal perforating branch of the distal coronary sinus, after which VT could not be induced. A month later, he returned in VT storm. Repeat study mapped clinical VT earliest to the basal anteroseptal RVOT, with a focal breakout pattern on both LV and RV consistent with a deep septal substrate (earliest activation signals ~40 ms preQRS). After attempting unipolar ablation from the LV aspect, bipolar ablation was performed across the basal anterior interventricular septum. VT could no longer be induced with triple extrastimuli, on isoproterenol. On recent routine outpatient visit 6 months later, a new murmur was noted. Multimodality imaging revealed a large (10 mm) outlet VSD in the anteroseptum with left to right shunt (Qp:Qs 1.5). LV function and cardiac index were mildly reduced (CI 2.0 ml/kg/m 2 ). No evidence of pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction. After multidisciplinary heart team discussion, decision was made to attempt surgical closure. Conclusion: Patients with refractory VT managed with multiple ablations at the same focus using different technologies should be closely monitored on an outpatient basis to evaluate for rare complications such as VSD.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation
Published
2024-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.150.suppl_1.4140690
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract 4140690: Management of Ventricular Septal Defect after Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

George Shaw, Andrew Oehler, Joshua R. Silverstein, Manasvi Gupta
Circulation
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
article

Abstract 4140690: Management of Ventricular Septal Defect after Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia

George Shaw, Andrew Oehler, Joshua R. Silverstein, Manasvi Gupta
article en

Abstract

Background: Ventricular septal defect (VSD) can develop as a rare complication in patients undergoing bipolar radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachycardia (VT). Case: A 67-year-old male with nonischemic cardiomyopathy underwent three VT ablations over 2 years for recurrent LV summit VT. At the initial procedure, minimal bipolar voltage abnormality but significant unipolar voltage abnormality was found at the basal interventricular septum, periaortic tissue, and left ventricular (LV) summit, consistent with mid-myocardial fibrosis. Extensive endocardial unipolar radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was performed on the LV side. Despite lack of inducibility with triple extrastimuli, VT recurred that was treated with sotalol and mexiletine. One year ago, due to recurrent symptomatic VT, he underwent a redo ablation. The clinical VT mapped earliest to the right ventricular (RV) side of basal anteroseptum. Extensive RV and LV endocardial unipolar RFA was performed, but VT remained inducible. Therefore, ethanol ablation was performed through septal perforating branch of the distal coronary sinus, after which VT could not be induced. A month later, he returned in VT storm. Repeat study mapped clinical VT earliest to the basal anteroseptal RVOT, with a focal breakout pattern on both LV and RV consistent with a deep septal substrate (earliest activation signals ~40 ms preQRS). After attempting unipolar ablation from the LV aspect, bipolar ablation was performed across the basal anterior interventricular septum. VT could no longer be induced with triple extrastimuli, on isoproterenol. On recent routine outpatient visit 6 months later, a new murmur was noted. Multimodality imaging revealed a large (10 mm) outlet VSD in the anteroseptum with left to right shunt (Qp:Qs 1.5). LV function and cardiac index were mildly reduced (CI 2.0 ml/kg/m 2 ). No evidence of pulmonary hypertension or RV dysfunction. After multidisciplinary heart team discussion, decision was made to attempt surgical closure. Conclusion: Patients with refractory VT managed with multiple ablations at the same focus using different technologies should be closely monitored on an outpatient basis to evaluate for rare complications such as VSD.

CirculationVol. 150(Suppl_1)
Allegheny Health Network (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.